LYFE Sciences · Project HERA
Variant Interpretation · Classification Report
Variant classification summary
NM_016222.2:c.1480_1496dup
DDX41
· NP_057306.2:p.(Ala500ArgfsTer52)
· NM_016222.2
GRCh37: chr5:176939549 A>AGGGAAGTCCAGGCCCTT
·
GRCh38: chr5:177512548 A>AGGGAAGTCCAGGCCCTT
Gene:
DDX41
Transcript:
NM_016222.2
Final call
Likely Pathogenic
PVS1_Strong
PM2_Supporting
Variant details
Gene
DDX41
Transcript
NM_016222.2
Protein
NP_057306.2:p.(Ala500ArgfsTer52)
gnomAD AF
ClinVar
OncoKB
Classification rationale
Interpretation summary
Generated evidence synthesis
1
NM_016222.2:c.1480_1496dup is a frameshifting duplication predicted to produce p.(Ala500ArgfsTer52) [p.(A500Rfs*52)], altering the reading frame from codon 500 and truncating the normal C-terminal portion of DDX41; this is consistent with a loss-of-function effect in a gene for which loss of function has been implicated in DDX41-related hematologic malignancy predisposition syndrome.
2
The variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and is seen once in gnomAD v4.1 at AF 6.84053e-07 (1/1,461,874 alleles), with highest observed population AF 8.99276e-07 in non-Finnish Europeans, supporting marked rarity in population databases.
3
Because the predicted premature termination occurs in the terminal exon, the available loss-of-function evidence is most appropriately weighted below full very-strong strength, and no additional independently curated case-level or functional evidence in the supplied materials upgrades the variant beyond the likely pathogenic range.
4
Overall, the available evidence supports classification of NM_016222.2:c.1480_1496dup (DDX41 p.(Ala500ArgfsTer52)) as Likely Pathogenic.
Final determination:
Criteria assessment
ACMG/AMP criteria review
Criteria shown when status is available
All criteria require review: For research and educational purposes only.
| Criterion | Status | Rationale | Evidence used |
|---|---|---|---|
| PVS1 | Met | NM_016222.2:c.1480_1496dup is a frameshifting duplication predicted to produce p.(Ala500ArgfsTer52)/p.(A500Rfs*52). VariantValidator places the change in exon 14, the last exon, so nonsense-mediated decay is not expected; however, the variant removes and replaces a substantial C-terminal portion of the normal protein. DDX41 loss of function is an established disease mechanism for DDX41-related hematologic malignancy predisposition, so generic ACMG PVS1 is applicable but conservatively downgraded to Strong for a terminal-exon truncating event. |
oncokb
PMID:26712909
PMID:36322930
|
| PS1 | Not assessed | No same-amino-acid pathogenic variant comparison was documented for this frameshift duplication. |
|
| PS2 | Not assessed | No confirmed de novo data were provided. |
|
| PS3 | Not assessed | The screened functional literature supports DDX41 biology but does not provide a variant-specific, well-established functional assay for NM_016222.2:c.1480_1496dup. |
PMID:33651979
PMID:36322930
|
| PS4 | Not assessed | ClinVar lists the variant as Pathogenic, but the workspace does not provide independently curated proband counts or case-control data sufficient to score PS4. |
clinvar
|
| PM1 | N/A | This is a truncating frameshift variant, and the workspace did not identify a statistically significant hotspot at residue Ala500. |
|
| PM2 | Met | The variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and present once in gnomAD v4.1 at AF 6.84053e-07 (1/1,461,874 alleles), with highest observed population AF 8.99276e-07 in non-Finnish Europeans; this supports rarity and is well below generic ACMG rarity cutoffs. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| PM3 | N/A | PM3 is not applicable for this autosomal dominant disorder context. |
cspec
|
| PM4 | N/A | PM4 was not applied because the protein-length altering effect is already captured by PVS1 for this loss-of-function frameshift. |
|
| PM5 | Not assessed | PM5 is not informative for this frameshift duplication. |
|
| PM6 | Not assessed | No assumed de novo evidence was provided. |
|
| PP1 | Not assessed | No segregation data were provided. |
|
| PP2 | N/A | PP2 is a missense-focused criterion and is not applicable to this frameshift duplication. |
|
| PP3 | N/A | PP3 was not applied because this is a frameshifting duplication rather than a missense or splice-region variant with interpretable in silico thresholds in the workspace. |
|
| PP4 | Not assessed | No phenotype-specific case data were provided for the tested individual. |
|
| PP5 | N/A | PP5 was not used because reputable-source assertions are not applied as independent evidence under current ClinGen practice. |
clinvar
|
| BA1 | Not met | The observed gnomAD v4.1 AF of 6.84053e-07 is far below any stand-alone benign frequency threshold. |
gnomad_v4
|
| BS1 | Not met | The observed gnomAD v4.1 AF of 6.84053e-07 and highest population AF of 8.99276e-07 are far below benign strong frequency ranges. |
gnomad_v4
|
| BS2 | Not assessed | No evidence of the variant in well-phenotyped unaffected adults was provided. |
|
| BS3 | Not assessed | No variant-specific well-established functional studies demonstrating normal function were provided. |
PMID:33651979
|
| BS4 | Not assessed | No segregation-against-disease data were provided. |
|
| BP1 | N/A | BP1 is a missense-specific benign criterion and is not applicable to this truncating frameshift variant. |
|
| BP2 | Not assessed | No phase data or second pathogenic variant data were provided. |
|
| BP3 | Not assessed | No evidence indicates that this duplication lies within a benign repetitive region without known function. |
|
| BP4 | N/A | BP4 was not applied because this is a frameshifting duplication and no benign in silico evidence was provided. |
|
| BP5 | Not assessed | No alternate molecular explanation for the phenotype was provided. |
|
| BP6 | N/A | BP6 was not used because external assertions without shared evidence are not applied as independent evidence under current ClinGen practice. |
|
| BP7 | N/A | BP7 is a synonymous/intronic criterion and is not applicable to this coding frameshift duplication. |
|
Disclaimer:
The content and results provided by LYFE Sciences are for research and educational purposes only and must not be used as a substitute for professional medical judgment, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making any clinical decisions.