LYFE Sciences · Project HERA
Variant Interpretation · Classification Report
Variant classification summary
NM_001904.4:c.452G>A
CTNNB1
· NP_001895.1:p.(Arg151His)
· NM_001904.4
GRCh37: chr3:41266655 G>A
·
GRCh38: chr3:41225164 G>A
Gene:
CTNNB1
Transcript:
NM_001904.4
Final call
PM2
Variant details
Gene
CTNNB1
Transcript
NM_001904.4
Protein
NP_001895.1:p.(Arg151His)
gnomAD AF
ClinVar
OncoKB
Classification rationale
Interpretation summary
Generated evidence synthesis
1
CTNNB1 NM_001904.4:c.452G>A, p.(Arg151His) is present in gnomAD v4.1 at a total allele frequency of 0.000117726 (190/1613916) with a highest observed population frequency of 0.000154237 in European non-Finnish individuals, both below the non-VCEP PM2 rarity threshold of 0.001 (0.1%), supporting rarity but not absence from population databases.
2
SpliceAI predicts a maximum delta score of 0.02, which is below the splice impact threshold of 0.2 and argues against a splice-disrupting effect.
3
ClinVar contains conflicting single-submitter classifications of likely benign and uncertain significance, so this assertion set does not provide decisive classification evidence.
4
In the absence of gene-specific criteria, robust case-level enrichment, segregation, de novo, or functional evidence, CTNNB1 p.(Arg151His) is classified as a variant of uncertain significance.
Final determination:
Criteria assessment
ACMG/AMP criteria review
Criteria shown when status is available
All criteria require review: For research and educational purposes only.
| Criterion | Status | Rationale | Evidence used |
|---|---|---|---|
| PVS1 | N/A | Missense change NM_001904.4:c.452G>A results in p.(Arg151His) rather than a predicted loss-of-function variant, so PVS1 is not applicable. |
|
| PS1 | Not assessed | No same-amino-acid pathogenic variant at this residue was documented in the reviewed workspace materials. |
|
| PS2 | Not assessed | No de novo occurrence data with confirmed maternity and paternity were provided. |
|
| PS3 | Not assessed | No validated functional assay results for CTNNB1 p.(Arg151His) were provided. |
|
| PS4 | Not met | No case-control enrichment or multiple affected probands were established, and the PS4 literature screen did not identify supportive case evidence. |
PMID:28492532
|
| PM1 | Not met | Cancer Hotspots did not identify residue Arg151 as a statistically significant hotspot, so PM1 is not supported by the assembled hotspot evidence. |
|
| PM2 | Met | The variant is rare in population databases: gnomAD v4.1 total AF is 0.000117726 (190/1613916) and highest observed population AF is 0.000154237 in European non-Finnish individuals, both below the non-VCEP PM2 threshold of 0.001 (0.1%). gnomAD v2.1 also shows very low frequency (total AF 0.0000318573; highest population AF 0.000070466). |
gnomad_v4
gnomad_v2
|
| PM3 | Not assessed | No data on occurrence in trans with a pathogenic variant were provided. |
|
| PM4 | N/A | This is a missense substitution and not an in-frame deletion/insertion or stop-loss variant, so PM4 is not applicable. |
|
| PM5 | Not assessed | No different pathogenic missense change at codon 151 was documented in the reviewed materials. |
|
| PM6 | Not assessed | No assumed de novo occurrence without full parental confirmation was provided. |
|
| PP1 | Not assessed | No segregation data were provided. |
|
| PP2 | Not assessed | The reviewed workspace did not provide gene-level evidence sufficient to determine whether CTNNB1 has a low rate of benign missense variation and whether missense is a primary established disease mechanism for the relevant germline disorder. |
|
| PP3 | Not met | SpliceAI shows a maximum delta score of 0.02, which is below the commonly used splice concern threshold of 0.2 and does not support splice disruption, and the available REVEL score of 0.466 is not sufficient on its own to establish deleterious computational evidence under a generic ACMG framework. |
spliceai
|
| PP4 | Not assessed | No phenotype or family history information specific enough to assess PP4 was provided. |
|
| PP5 | Not assessed | PP5 was not applied. ClinVar contains non-expert, conflicting single-submitter interpretations and this criterion is not used as decisive evidence here. |
clinvar
PMID:28492532
|
| BA1 | Not met | The highest observed gnomAD v4.1 population AF is 0.000154237 (0.01542%), which is below the non-VCEP BA1 threshold of 0.01 (1%). |
gnomad_v4
|
| BS1 | Not met | The highest observed gnomAD v4.1 population AF is 0.000154237 (0.01542%), which is below the non-VCEP BS1 threshold of 0.003 (0.3%). |
gnomad_v4
|
| BS2 | Not assessed | No criterion-specific evidence for observation in healthy adults inconsistent with the expected penetrance or age of onset was provided. |
|
| BS3 | Not assessed | No well-established functional studies demonstrating a benign effect were provided. |
|
| BS4 | Not assessed | No segregation data demonstrating lack of cosegregation were provided. |
|
| BP1 | Not assessed | The reviewed workspace did not provide gene-level disease-mechanism evidence sufficient to support BP1 for CTNNB1 missense variation. |
|
| BP2 | Not assessed | No phase information showing the variant in trans with a pathogenic variant or in cis with another variant was provided. |
|
| BP3 | N/A | This is not an in-frame indel in a repetitive region, so BP3 is not applicable. |
|
| BP4 | Not met | SpliceAI predicts no meaningful splice impact with a max delta score of 0.02, which is below 0.2, but the available generic ACMG evidence set does not provide sufficient calibrated benign missense prediction evidence to apply BP4 because the REVEL score of 0.466 is intermediate and no gene-specific computational framework is available. |
spliceai
|
| BP5 | Not assessed | No alternate molecular diagnosis or established alternate cause for the phenotype was provided. |
|
| BP6 | Not assessed | BP6 was not applied. ClinVar contains conflicting non-expert single-submitter assertions, which do not provide sufficiently strong benign evidence for this review. |
clinvar
|
| BP7 | N/A | BP7 applies to synonymous or intronic variants with no predicted splice impact; this variant is missense and BP7 is not applicable. |
spliceai
|
Disclaimer:
The content and results provided by LYFE Sciences are for research and educational purposes only and must not be used as a substitute for professional medical judgment, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making any clinical decisions.