LYFE Sciences · Project HERA
Variant Interpretation · Classification Report
Variant classification summary
NM_006231.4:c.889T>C
POLE
· NP_006222.2:p.(Ser297Pro)
· NM_006231.4
GRCh37: chr12:133253152 A>G
·
GRCh38: chr12:132676566 A>G
Gene:
POLE
Transcript:
NM_006231.4
Final call
VUS
PM2
Variant details
Gene
POLE
Transcript
NM_006231.4
Protein
NP_006222.2:p.(Ser297Pro)
gnomAD AF
ClinVar
OncoKB
Classification rationale
Interpretation summary
Generated evidence synthesis
1
POLE p.(Ser297Pro) is absent from gnomAD v2.1.
2
The variant is also absent from gnomAD v4.1, supporting rarity, although no explicit POLE-specific population cutoff was retrieved.
3
SpliceAI predicts no significant splice effect with a maximum delta score of 0.00, but no explicit computational threshold framework was retrieved to convert the available in silico data into PP3 or BP4.
4
No ClinVar classification has been reported for this variant.
5
With PM2 applied and no additional pathogenic or benign criteria established, this variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance under the retrieved generic ACMG/AMP combination rules.
Final determination:
Criteria assessment
ACMG/AMP criteria review
Criteria shown when status is available
All criteria require review: For research and educational purposes only.
| Criterion | Status | Rationale | Evidence used |
|---|---|---|---|
| PVS1 | N/A | NM_006231.4:c.889T>C is a missense substitution predicted as p.(Ser297Pro) / p.(S297P), not a null variant in a gene where loss of function is being evaluated under PVS1. |
|
| PS1 | Not assessed | No retrieved source established that this amino-acid change matches a previously classified pathogenic variant at the same residue with the same protein consequence. |
clinvar
|
| PS2 | Not assessed | No de novo data were retrieved. |
|
| PS3 | Not assessed | No well-established functional assay data were retrieved for this variant. |
|
| PS4 | Not assessed | No case-control enrichment or multiple independent affected observations were retrieved. |
clinvar
|
| PM1 | Not met | This residue was not identified as a statistically significant hotspot, and no critical functional domain evidence meeting PM1 was retrieved. |
|
| PM2 | Met | The variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and gnomAD v4.1, supporting rarity. No explicit POLE-specific PM2 frequency cutoff was retrieved, so this is a generic ACMG rarity assessment. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| PM3 | Not assessed | No phase data or occurrence with another pathogenic allele were retrieved. |
|
| PM4 | N/A | This is a single amino-acid substitution and does not produce a protein length change. |
|
| PM5 | Not assessed | No different pathogenic missense change at codon 297 was retrieved. |
clinvar
|
| PM6 | Not assessed | No assumed de novo data without parental confirmation were retrieved. |
|
| PP1 | Not assessed | No segregation data were retrieved. |
|
| PP2 | Not assessed | No retrieved gene-level evidence established that missense variation is a predominant disease mechanism suitable for PP2 application. |
|
| PP3 | Not assessed | REVEL is 0.774 and SpliceAI maximum delta score is 0.00, but no explicit computational threshold framework applicable to this case was retrieved to convert these values into PP3. |
spliceai
|
| PP4 | Not assessed | No phenotype-specific evidence for a highly specific POLE-associated presentation was provided. |
|
| PP5 | Not assessed | No reputable external pathogenic classification was retrieved. |
clinvar
|
| BA1 | Not met | The variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and gnomAD v4.1 and therefore does not meet a stand-alone benign population frequency criterion. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| BS1 | Not met | The variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and gnomAD v4.1 and does not meet a benign strong population frequency criterion. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| BS2 | Not assessed | No observations in healthy adult individuals inconsistent with disease penetrance were retrieved. |
|
| BS3 | Not assessed | No well-established functional evidence demonstrating no damaging effect was retrieved. |
|
| BS4 | Not assessed | No lack-of-segregation data were retrieved. |
|
| BP1 | Not assessed | No retrieved gene-level evidence supported BP1 for this missense variant. |
|
| BP2 | Not assessed | No phase data with another pathogenic variant were retrieved. |
|
| BP3 | Not assessed | No evidence was retrieved that the variant lies in a repetitive region without known function. |
|
| BP4 | Not met | Benign computational evidence was not established. SpliceAI shows a maximum delta score of 0.00, but REVEL is 0.774 and no retrieved framework supported an overall benign in silico interpretation. |
spliceai
|
| BP5 | Not assessed | No alternate molecular explanation accounting for the phenotype was retrieved. |
|
| BP6 | Not assessed | No reputable benign classification was retrieved. |
clinvar
|
| BP7 | N/A | BP7 is for synonymous or certain intronic variants without predicted splice impact; this variant is missense. |
spliceai
|
Disclaimer:
The content and results provided by LYFE Sciences are for research and educational purposes only and must not be used as a substitute for professional medical judgment, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making any clinical decisions.