LYFE Sciences · Project HERA
Variant Interpretation · Classification Report
Variant classification summary
NM_002354.3:c.457A>G
EPCAM
· NP_002345.2:p.(Arg153Gly)
· NM_002354.3
GRCh37: chr2:47602404 A>G
·
GRCh38: chr2:47375265 A>G
Gene:
EPCAM
Transcript:
NM_002354.3
Final call
VUS
PM2
Variant details
Gene
EPCAM
Transcript
NM_002354.3
Protein
NP_002345.2:p.(Arg153Gly)
gnomAD AF
ClinVar
OncoKB
Unknown Oncogenic Effect
Classification rationale
Interpretation summary
Generated evidence synthesis
1
The EPCAM c.457A>G (p.Arg153Gly) variant has been observed once in somatic cancers in COSMIC (COSV55394328) and has been reported in ClinVar as a variant of uncertain significance with one clinical laboratory submission.
2
This variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and is present in gnomAD v4.1 at 3/1,611,766 alleles (AF 0.00019%), with a highest observed population frequency of 0.00025% in European non-Finnish individuals, which is below the 0.1% PM2 threshold.
3
Available computational evidence does not support a splice effect, with a SpliceAI maximum delta score of 0.01, and the REVEL score of 0.363 does not provide concordant evidence for either a pathogenic or benign missense effect.
Final determination:
The single moderate criterion PM2 does not meet ACMG/AMP combination requirements for likely pathogenic, likely benign, benign, or pathogenic classification; therefore this variant is classified as uncertain significance.
Criteria assessment
ACMG/AMP criteria review
Criteria shown when status is available
All criteria require review: For research and educational purposes only.
| Criterion | Status | Rationale | Evidence used |
|---|---|---|---|
| PVS1 | N/A | This is a missense variant, NM_002354.3:c.457A>G (p.Arg153Gly), and not a predicted null variant. Available evidence does not support use of a loss-of-function criterion for this change. |
prefetch
|
| PS1 | Not assessed | No evidence was identified that this nucleotide change results in the same amino acid substitution as a previously established pathogenic variant. PS1 cannot be applied from the available data. |
clinvar
|
| PS2 | Not assessed | No confirmed de novo occurrence with verified maternity and paternity was identified for this variant. PS2 cannot be assessed from the available evidence. |
|
| PS3 | Not assessed | No well-established functional studies demonstrating a damaging effect of p.Arg153Gly were identified. PS3 cannot be applied from the available evidence. |
|
| PS4 | Not met | This variant has been observed once in COSMIC and is reported in ClinVar as a variant of uncertain significance from a single clinical laboratory, but these data do not demonstrate enrichment in affected individuals over controls. Available evidence does not support PS4. |
cosmic
clinvar
|
| PM1 | Not met | This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot, and no evidence was identified that Arg153 is located in a well-established critical functional domain without benign variation. Available evidence does not support PM1. |
hotspots
|
| PM2 | Met | Population frequency is very low. This variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and is present in gnomAD v4.1 at 3/1,611,766 alleles (AF 0.00019%), with highest observed subpopulation frequency 0.00025% in European non-Finnish individuals; this is below the 0.1% PM2 threshold. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| PM3 | Not assessed | No data were identified showing this variant in trans with a pathogenic variant in a recessive disorder context. PM3 cannot be assessed from the available evidence. |
|
| PM4 | N/A | This variant is a single amino acid substitution and does not change protein length. PM4 is not applicable. |
prefetch
|
| PM5 | Not assessed | No evidence was identified for a different pathogenic missense change at codon 153 that would support PM5. PM5 cannot be applied from the available data. |
clinvar
|
| PM6 | Not assessed | No presumed de novo occurrence was identified for this variant. PM6 cannot be assessed from the available evidence. |
|
| PP1 | Not assessed | No segregation data were identified for this variant. PP1 cannot be assessed from the available evidence. |
|
| PP2 | Not assessed | No gene-specific evidence was identified showing that pathogenic EPCAM missense variation is a common disease mechanism and that the gene has a low rate of benign missense variation. PP2 cannot be assessed from the available evidence. |
|
| PP3 | Not met | Available computational evidence does not provide concordant support for a deleterious effect. SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact with a maximum delta score of 0.01, and the REVEL score is 0.363, which does not support a clear damaging prediction. |
spliceai
prefetch
|
| PP4 | Not assessed | No phenotype information was identified showing a highly specific clinical presentation or family history attributable to EPCAM-related disease in a way that supports this variant. PP4 cannot be assessed from the available evidence. |
|
| PP5 | Not assessed | ClinVar lists this variant as uncertain significance from a single submitter, which does not provide a sufficiently established pathogenic assertion for PP5. PP5 is not applied. |
clinvar
|
| BA1 | Not met | Population frequency does not meet a stand-alone benign threshold. The highest observed frequency is 0.00025% in gnomAD v4.1, which is below the 1% BA1 threshold. |
gnomad_v4
|
| BS1 | Not met | Population frequency is not greater than expected for a benign variant under the default threshold. The highest observed frequency is 0.00025% in gnomAD v4.1, which is below the 0.3% BS1 threshold. |
gnomad_v4
|
| BS2 | Not assessed | No evidence was identified showing this variant in healthy adults at a count sufficient for BS2. Although no homozygotes are reported in gnomAD v4.1, these data do not support BS2. |
gnomad_v4
|
| BS3 | Not assessed | No well-established functional studies demonstrating a benign effect of p.Arg153Gly were identified. BS3 cannot be applied from the available evidence. |
|
| BS4 | Not assessed | No segregation studies were identified showing lack of segregation with disease. BS4 cannot be assessed from the available evidence. |
|
| BP1 | Not assessed | No gene-specific evidence was identified showing that truncating variants predominate as the established disease mechanism for EPCAM in a way that would support a benign interpretation of this missense change. BP1 cannot be assessed from the available evidence. |
|
| BP2 | Not assessed | No phase information was identified showing this variant in trans with a pathogenic variant for a dominant disorder or in cis with a pathogenic variant. BP2 cannot be assessed from the available evidence. |
|
| BP3 | N/A | This variant is not an in-frame deletion or insertion in a repetitive region. BP3 is not applicable. |
prefetch
|
| BP4 | Not met | Available computational evidence is insufficient to support a benign effect. SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact with a maximum delta score of 0.01, but the REVEL score of 0.363 is not low enough to provide concordant benign computational evidence. |
spliceai
prefetch
|
| BP5 | Not assessed | No alternate molecular explanation for the observed disease phenotype was identified that would support BP5. BP5 cannot be assessed from the available evidence. |
|
| BP6 | Not assessed | No reputable benign classification without available supporting evidence was identified. ClinVar lists this variant as uncertain significance, so BP6 is not applied. |
clinvar
|
| BP7 | N/A | This is not a synonymous or intronic splice-region variant. BP7 is not applicable. |
prefetch
|
Disclaimer:
The content and results provided by LYFE Sciences are for research and educational purposes only and must not be used as a substitute for professional medical judgment, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making any clinical decisions.