LYFE Sciences · Project HERA
Variant Interpretation · Classification Report
Variant classification summary
NM_002524.4:c.176C>A
NRAS
· NP_002515.1:p.(Ala59Asp)
· NM_002524.4
GRCh37: chr1:115256535 G>T
·
GRCh38: chr1:114713914 G>T
Gene:
NRAS
Transcript:
NM_002524.4
Final call
PM1
PM2_Supporting
PP3
Variant details
Gene
NRAS
Transcript
NM_002524.4
Protein
NP_002515.1:p.(Ala59Asp)
gnomAD AF
ClinVar
OncoKB
Likely Oncogenic
Classification rationale
Interpretation summary
Generated evidence synthesis
1
The NRAS c.176C>A (p.Ala59Asp, p.A59D) variant has been observed in somatic cancers in COSMIC (COSV54738004, 12 occurrences) and has been reported in ClinVar as Likely pathogenic by 1 clinical laboratory.
2
This variant is absent from gnomAD controls, with 0/1,611,062 alleles in gnomAD v4.1 and no observation in gnomAD v2.1, supporting PM2_Supporting and arguing against a benign population frequency threshold.
3
The variant is located in the NRAS Switch II domain (amino acids 57-64), a critical and well-established functional region specified for PM1 in the NRAS RASopathy criteria, but no ClinGen-approved variant-specific functional assay result was identified to apply PS3.
4
Computational evidence supports a deleterious missense effect because the REVEL score is 0.837, above the PP3 threshold of 0.7, while SpliceAI predicts no significant splice effect with a maximum delta score of 0.01.
Final determination:
PM1_Moderate with PM2_Supporting and PP3_Supporting does not reach the NRAS RASopathy Expert Panel threshold for likely pathogenicity and does not meet benign or likely benign criteria; the variant is therefore classified as of uncertain significance.
Criteria assessment
ACMG/AMP criteria review
Criteria shown when status is available
All criteria require review: For research and educational purposes only.
| Criterion | Status | Rationale | Evidence used |
|---|---|---|---|
| PVS1 | N/A | This missense variant does not create a predicted loss-of-function allele, and the NRAS RASopathy specification lists PVS1 as not applicable. |
cspec
pvs1_gene_context
pvs1_variant_assessment
|
| PS1 | Not assessed | No evidence was identified showing that this nucleotide change produces the same amino acid substitution as a previously established pathogenic variant. |
cspec
clinvar
|
| PS2 | Not assessed | No confirmed de novo occurrence with phenotype and parental testing information was identified, so PS2 cannot be scored. |
cspec
literature_pass
|
| PS3 | Not assessed | Approved functional assay types for NRAS are listed by the RASopathy VCEP, but no variant-specific result for p.Ala59Asp was identified in the available functional materials, so PS3 is not applied. |
cspec
vcep_s_v_i___r_a_s_o_p_a_t_h_y___v_c_e_p___v_2___a_p_p_r_o_v_e_d___f_u_n_c_t_i_o_n_a_l___s_t_u_d_i_e_s
oncokb
|
| PS4 | Not assessed | This variant has been reported in ClinVar and in somatic cancers in COSMIC, but no germline case-count or case-control data were identified to assign the RASopathy point-based PS4 criterion. |
cspec
clinvar
cosmic
literature_pass
|
| PM1 | Met | The p.Ala59Asp missense change lies within the NRAS Switch II region (amino acids 57-64), which is a critical and well-established functional domain specified for PM1 in the NRAS RASopathy criteria. |
cspec
vcep_a_l_i_g_n_m_e_n_t___w_i_t_h___p_m_1___d_o_m_a_i_n_s___p_p_t_x
|
| PM2 | Met | This variant is absent from gnomAD controls, with 0/1,611,062 alleles in gnomAD v4.1 and no observation in gnomAD v2.1, which meets the NRAS PM2_Supporting rule requiring absence from controls. |
cspec
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| PM3 | N/A | PM3 is not applicable in the NRAS RASopathy specification. |
cspec
|
| PM4 | N/A | This is a missense substitution and does not change protein length, so PM4 is not applicable. |
cspec
|
| PM5 | Not assessed | No codon-specific evidence was identified showing a different established pathogenic missense change at NRAS codon 59 or an applicable analogous residue position sufficient to assign PM5. |
cspec
clinvar
|
| PM6 | Not assessed | No assumed de novo case information without confirmed parentage was identified, so PM6 cannot be scored. |
cspec
literature_pass
|
| PP1 | Not assessed | No segregation data were identified, so PP1 is not met. |
cspec
literature_pass
|
| PP2 | N/A | PP2 is not applicable in the NRAS RASopathy specification. |
cspec
|
| PP3 | Met | Computational evidence supports a deleterious protein effect because the REVEL score is 0.837, which is above the NRAS PP3 threshold of 0.7, while SpliceAI shows no meaningful splice effect (max delta score 0.01), supporting a missense rather than splice mechanism. |
cspec
spliceai
|
| PP4 | N/A | PP4 is not applicable in the NRAS RASopathy specification. |
cspec
|
| PP5 | N/A | PP5 is not applicable in the NRAS RASopathy specification. |
cspec
|
| BA1 | Not met | Population frequency does not meet BA1 because the gnomAD v4.1 allele frequency is 0.0% (0/1,611,062), which is below the BA1 threshold of 0.05%. |
cspec
gnomad_v4
|
| BS1 | Not met | Population frequency does not meet BS1 because the gnomAD v4.1 allele frequency is 0.0% (0/1,611,062), which is below the BS1 threshold of 0.025%. |
cspec
gnomad_v4
|
| BS2 | Not assessed | No data were identified showing this variant in unaffected individuals in a manner that would support BS2. |
cspec
gnomad_v4
|
| BS3 | N/A | BS3 is not applicable in the NRAS RASopathy specification. |
cspec
|
| BS4 | Not assessed | No non-segregation data were identified, so BS4 is not met. |
cspec
literature_pass
|
| BP1 | N/A | This criterion is reserved in the NRAS RASopathy specification for truncating variants in a gain-of-function disease context and does not apply to this missense variant. |
cspec
|
| BP2 | Not assessed | No data were identified showing this variant in cis or trans with an alternative molecular explanation for the phenotype, so BP2 is not applied. |
cspec
literature_pass
|
| BP3 | N/A | BP3 is not applicable in the NRAS RASopathy specification. |
cspec
|
| BP4 | Not met | Computational evidence does not support BP4 because the REVEL score is 0.837, which is above the benign threshold of 0.3. |
cspec
spliceai
|
| BP5 | Not assessed | No evidence was identified for an alternate molecular basis explaining the phenotype independent of this variant, so BP5 is not applied. |
cspec
literature_pass
|
| BP6 | N/A | BP6 is not applicable in the NRAS RASopathy specification. |
cspec
|
| BP7 | N/A | BP7 applies to synonymous, intronic, or non-coding variants with no predicted splice impact and does not apply to this missense variant. |
cspec
spliceai
|
Disclaimer:
The content and results provided by LYFE Sciences are for research and educational purposes only and must not be used as a substitute for professional medical judgment, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making any clinical decisions.