LYFE Sciences · Project HERA
Variant Interpretation · Classification Report
Variant classification summary
NM_006231.4:c.5312C>T
POLE
· NP_006222.2:p.(Thr1771Met)
· NM_006231.4
GRCh37: chr12:133218299 G>A
·
GRCh38: chr12:132641713 G>A
Gene:
POLE
Transcript:
NM_006231.4
Final call
VUS
PM2_Moderate
Variant details
Gene
POLE
Transcript
NM_006231.4
Protein
NP_006222.2:p.(Thr1771Met)
gnomAD AF
ClinVar
OncoKB
Unknown Oncogenic Effect
Classification rationale
Interpretation summary
Generated evidence synthesis
1
The POLE c.5312C>T (p.Thr1771Met) variant has been observed in somatic cancers in COSMIC (COSV57679989, n=2) and has been reported in ClinVar as a variant of uncertain significance.
2
The variant is present at low frequency in population databases, with gnomAD v2.1 AF 3.9888e-05 (10/250702) and gnomAD v4.1 AF 4.09054e-05 (66/1613480), with no homozygotes reported; these values are below the PM2 threshold of 0.1% and below the BS1 and BA1 thresholds of 0.3% and 1%, respectively.
3
No validated variant-specific functional assay evidence was identified for p.(Thr1771Met).
4
SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact (maximum delta score 0.04), and the local REVEL score is 0.178; however, the variant is not represented in the León-Castillo POLE supplementary computational tables, so the custom POLE PP3 and BP4 rules were not applied.
Final determination:
PM2 at moderate strength alone does not meet the ACMG/AMP combination threshold for likely pathogenic, pathogenic, likely benign, or benign classification; therefore the variant is classified as of uncertain significance.
Criteria assessment
ACMG/AMP criteria review
Criteria shown when status is available
All criteria require review: For research and educational purposes only.
| Criterion | Status | Rationale | Evidence used |
|---|---|---|---|
| PVS1 | N/A | NM_006231.4:c.5312C>T predicts a missense change, p.(Thr1771Met), rather than a null variant, and the generic PVS1 assessment does not place this variant in a nonsense, frameshift, or canonical splice category, so PVS1 is not applicable. |
pvs1_gene_context
pvs1_variant_assessment
|
| PS1 | Not assessed | No evidence was identified showing that a different nucleotide change causing the same amino acid substitution p.(Thr1771Met) is established as pathogenic or likely pathogenic. |
clinvar
|
| PS2 | Not assessed | No confirmed de novo occurrence with parental confirmation was identified. |
|
| PS3 | Not assessed | No validated variant-specific functional studies were identified showing a damaging effect for p.(Thr1771Met). |
oncokb
|
| PS4 | Not met | Under the custom POLE framework, PS4 is restricted to exact variants recurrent in both COSMIC and TCGA endometrial carcinoma cohorts with combined count at least 10 and belonging to the established pathogenic set. p.(Thr1771Met) is not included in that set, and COSMIC shows only 2 somatic observations, which is below the framework requirement. |
cosmic
vcep_p_a_t_h___2_5_0___3_2_3
vcep_p_a_t_h___2_5_0___3_2_3___s_0_0_2
final_classification_framework
|
| PM1 | Not met | The custom POLE framework does not assign PM1 by domain location alone and limits PM1 to specific exact substitutions from León-Castillo et al. p.(Thr1771Met) is not one of the exact PM1-eligible hotspot, pathogenic non-hotspot, or uncertain-tier recurrent substitutions, and Cancer Hotspots did not show a statistically significant hotspot at residue T1771. |
hotspots
vcep_p_a_t_h___2_5_0___3_2_3
vcep_p_a_t_h___2_5_0___3_2_3___s_0_0_2
final_classification_framework
|
| PM2 | Met | This variant is present at low frequency in population databases, with gnomAD v2.1 AF 3.9888e-05 (0.00399%, 10/250702 alleles) and gnomAD v4.1 AF 4.09054e-05 (0.00409%, 66/1613480 alleles), both below the project's PM2 threshold of 0.1%, with no homozygotes reported. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| PM3 | N/A | PM3 is a recessive trans-observation criterion, and no qualifying recessive trans observations were identified for this POLE missense variant. |
|
| PM4 | N/A | This variant is a missense substitution and does not cause a protein length change or an in-frame insertion or deletion, so PM4 is not applicable. |
pvs1_variant_assessment
|
| PM5 | Not assessed | No evidence was identified for a different pathogenic or likely pathogenic missense change affecting the same amino acid residue Thr1771. |
clinvar
|
| PM6 | Not assessed | No assumed de novo occurrence data were identified. |
|
| PP1 | Not assessed | No segregation data were identified to show co-segregation with disease in affected relatives. |
|
| PP2 | Not assessed | No gene-level evidence was retrieved showing that POLE has a low rate of benign missense variation together with missense variants as a common disease mechanism in a way that would support PP2 for this review. |
|
| PP3 | Not assessed | The custom POLE PP3 rule requires the exact variant to appear in León-Castillo Supplementary Table S2 or S3 with a REVEL class of 'likely disease causing' and no more than 1 benign in silico result. p.(Thr1771Met) was not found in those tables, so the custom PP3 rule cannot be applied. SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact (maximum delta score 0.04), and the local REVEL score is 0.178, but a separate generic missense PP3 threshold set was not retrieved. |
spliceai
vcep_p_a_t_h___2_5_0___3_2_3___s_0_0_3
vcep_p_a_t_h___2_5_0___3_2_3___s_0_0_4
final_classification_framework
|
| PP4 | Not assessed | No phenotype-specific clinical presentation or tumor signature evidence was identified that would support a highly specific POLE-associated presentation for this variant. |
vcep_p_a_t_h___2_5_0___3_2_3
|
| PP5 | N/A | PP5 was not used because assertion-only external classifications are not applied in this review framework. |
clinvar
|
| BA1 | Not met | Population frequency is below the benign stand-alone threshold: gnomAD v2.1 AF is 0.00399% and gnomAD v4.1 AF is 0.00409%, both well below the BA1 threshold of 1%. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| BS1 | Not met | Population frequency is below the strong benign threshold: gnomAD v2.1 AF is 0.00399% and gnomAD v4.1 AF is 0.00409%, both below the BS1 threshold of 0.3%. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| BS2 | Not assessed | No evidence was identified showing this variant in a sufficient number of well-characterized unaffected individuals for BS2. |
|
| BS3 | Not assessed | No validated variant-specific functional studies were identified showing no damaging effect for p.(Thr1771Met). |
oncokb
|
| BS4 | Not assessed | No nonsegregation data were identified. |
|
| BP1 | Not assessed | No gene-specific framework was retrieved supporting BP1 for missense variation in POLE. |
|
| BP2 | Not assessed | No phase or co-occurrence data were identified to support BP2. |
|
| BP3 | N/A | BP3 applies to in-frame insertions or deletions in repetitive regions without known function, and this variant is a missense substitution, so BP3 is not applicable. |
|
| BP4 | Not assessed | The custom POLE BP4 rule requires the exact variant to appear in León-Castillo Supplementary Table S2 or S3 with REVEL class 'Likely benign' or 'Likely-benign' and at least 4 benign in silico results. p.(Thr1771Met) was not found in those tables, so the custom BP4 rule cannot be applied. SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact (maximum delta score 0.04), and the local REVEL score is 0.178, but a separate generic missense BP4 threshold set was not retrieved. |
spliceai
vcep_p_a_t_h___2_5_0___3_2_3___s_0_0_3
vcep_p_a_t_h___2_5_0___3_2_3___s_0_0_4
final_classification_framework
|
| BP5 | Not assessed | No alternate molecular diagnosis or other variant explaining the phenotype was identified. |
|
| BP6 | N/A | BP6 was not used because assertion-only external classifications are not applied in this review framework. |
clinvar
|
| BP7 | N/A | BP7 applies to synonymous or certain intronic variants predicted to have no splicing impact, and this variant is a missense substitution, so BP7 is not applicable. |
spliceai
|
Disclaimer:
The content and results provided by LYFE Sciences are for research and educational purposes only and must not be used as a substitute for professional medical judgment, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making any clinical decisions.