LYFE Sciences · Project HERA
Variant Interpretation · Classification Report
Variant classification summary
NM_005373.2:c.1544G>T
MPL
· NP_005364.1:p.(Trp515Leu)
· NM_005373.2
GRCh37: chr1:43815009 G>T
·
GRCh38: chr1:43349338 G>T
Gene:
MPL
Transcript:
NM_005373.2
Final call
Likely Pathogenic
PS3
PM1
PM2
Variant details
Gene
MPL
Transcript
NM_005373.2
Protein
NP_005364.1:p.(Trp515Leu)
gnomAD AF
ClinVar
OncoKB
Oncogenic
Classification rationale
Interpretation summary
Generated evidence synthesis
1
The MPL c.1544G>T (p.Trp515Leu; p.W515L) variant has been reported in somatic myeloproliferative neoplasms and is listed in ClinVar with one Pathogenic submission and one Uncertain significance submission.
2
This variant is rare in population databases, with gnomAD v2.1 allele frequency 7.98378e-06 (0.00080%, 2/250508) and gnomAD v4.1 allele frequency 1.23979e-05 (0.00124%, 20/1613182), both below the 0.1% PM2 threshold.
3
Available functional evidence supports an abnormal activating effect, as p.W515L is described as an activating MPL variant and OncoKB classifies it as oncogenic with gain-of-function activity.
4
SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant, with a maximum delta score of 0.03.
Final determination:
Generic ACMG/AMP 2015 fallback rules support a Likely Pathogenic classification based on the observed combination of pathogenic criteria.
Criteria assessment
ACMG/AMP criteria review
Criteria shown when status is available
All criteria require review: For research and educational purposes only.
| Criterion | Status | Rationale | Evidence used |
|---|---|---|---|
| PVS1 | Not met | This is a missense variant, and the generic PVS1 framework indicates that it does not fall within the null-variant categories used for PVS1 application. |
pvs1_gene_context
pvs1_variant_assessment
pvs1_generic_framework
|
| PS1 | Not assessed | No evidence was identified here showing a different nucleotide change that results in the same amino acid substitution with an established pathogenic classification. |
|
| PS2 | Not assessed | No confirmed de novo occurrence with verified maternity and paternity was identified. |
|
| PS3 | Met | Functional evidence supports a damaging effect. This variant is described as an activating MPL mutation in the literature, and OncoKB classifies p.W515L as oncogenic with gain-of-function activity, which is consistent with an abnormal functional effect relevant to disease. |
oncokb
PMID:16834459
PMID:28823277
|
| PS4 | Not assessed | This variant has been reported in affected myeloproliferative neoplasm cohorts, but the available evidence does not provide a germline case-control comparison sufficient to determine whether the prevalence in affected individuals is significantly increased over controls for ACMG PS4. |
PMID:16834459
PMID:16868251
PMID:20113333
PMID:21326037
|
| PM1 | Met | This missense variant affects MPL codon Trp515, a recurrent activating site associated with myeloproliferative neoplasms. The variant has recurrent somatic observations and variant-specific oncogenic gain-of-function annotation, supporting location in a critical functional region. |
oncokb
PMID:16834459
PMID:16868251
|
| PM2 | Met | Population frequency is very low. In gnomAD v2.1 the allele frequency is 7.98378e-06 (0.00080%, 2/250508), and in gnomAD v4.1 the allele frequency is 1.23979e-05 (0.00124%, 20/1613182), with highest observed population frequency 6.683e-05 (0.00668%, East Asian) and grpmax FAF 1.772e-05; these values are all below the 0.1% PM2 threshold. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| PM3 | N/A | No recessive context with confirmed trans observations was identified for this variant. |
|
| PM4 | N/A | This is a missense substitution and does not cause a protein length change. |
|
| PM5 | Not assessed | Other potentially relevant missense changes at codon 515 are mentioned in the literature, but a curated same-residue pathogenic comparison suitable for ACMG PM5 was not established here. |
PMID:20113333
|
| PM6 | Not assessed | No assumed de novo occurrence without confirmed parentage was identified. |
|
| PP1 | Not assessed | No segregation data were identified. |
|
| PP2 | Not assessed | Available evidence does not establish a gene-specific missense mechanism or constraint pattern sufficient to apply PP2. |
|
| PP3 | Not met | Computational evidence does not independently support a splice-disrupting effect. SpliceAI shows a maximum delta score of 0.03, which is below commonly used splice concern thresholds. |
spliceai
|
| PP4 | Not assessed | No individual-level phenotype data were identified that would show a highly specific MPL-related presentation for this variant. |
|
| PP5 | N/A | Assertion-based evidence from external classifications is not used as independent support under current ACMG/AMP practice. |
clinvar
|
| BA1 | Not met | Population frequency is below the benign stand-alone threshold. The highest observed gnomAD v4.1 population frequency is 6.683e-05 (0.00668%), which is below the 1% BA1 threshold. |
gnomad_v4
|
| BS1 | Not met | Population frequency is below the benign strong threshold. The highest observed gnomAD v4.1 population frequency is 6.683e-05 (0.00668%), which is below the 0.3% BS1 threshold. |
gnomad_v4
|
| BS2 | Not assessed | The variant is present at very low frequency in population databases, but those observations do not establish occurrence in well-phenotyped healthy individuals sufficient for BS2. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| BS3 | Not met | Available functional evidence does not support a benign effect. Instead, the identified studies and curated oncology annotation are consistent with an activating effect. |
oncokb
PMID:16834459
PMID:28823277
|
| BS4 | Not assessed | No nonsegregation data were identified. |
|
| BP1 | N/A | Available evidence does not support using BP1 for this missense variant. |
|
| BP2 | Not assessed | No phase data with another pathogenic variant were identified. |
|
| BP3 | Not assessed | No evidence was identified showing that this variant lies in a repetitive region without known function. |
|
| BP4 | Not met | Computational evidence does not support a benign splice effect. SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact, but that finding alone is not sufficient to support BP4 for this missense variant. |
spliceai
|
| BP5 | Not assessed | No alternate molecular explanation for the observed disease was identified. |
|
| BP6 | N/A | Assertion-based evidence from external classifications is not used as independent benign support under current ACMG/AMP practice. |
clinvar
|
| BP7 | N/A | This criterion is not applicable because the variant is missense rather than synonymous or intronic outside splice-impact positions. |
|
Disclaimer:
The content and results provided by LYFE Sciences are for research and educational purposes only and must not be used as a substitute for professional medical judgment, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making any clinical decisions.