LYFE Sciences · Project HERA
Variant Interpretation · Classification Report
Variant classification summary
NM_003620.3:c.1613del
PPM1D
· NP_003611.1:p.(Leu538Ter)
· NM_003620.3
GRCh37: chr17:58740706 AT>A
·
GRCh38: chr17:60663345 AT>A
Gene:
PPM1D
Transcript:
NM_003620.3
Final call
Likely Pathogenic
PVS1_Strong
PM2_Supporting
Variant details
Gene
PPM1D
Transcript
NM_003620.3
Protein
NP_003611.1:p.(Leu538Ter)
gnomAD AF
ClinVar
OncoKB
Likely Oncogenic
Classification rationale
Interpretation summary
Generated evidence synthesis
1
The PPM1D NM_003620.3:c.1613del (NP_003611.1:p.(Leu538Ter), p.(L538*)) variant has been observed in somatic cancer resources as a variant-specific likely oncogenic truncating alteration and has not been reported in ClinVar.
2
This variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and is present only once in gnomAD v4.1 (AF 6.19495e-07; 1/1614218 alleles), which is below the 0.1% rarity threshold and supports a rarity-based criterion.
3
Experimental studies of terminal truncating PPM1D variants show increased protein stability or activity and altered DNA-damage-response signaling, but the available studies do not directly test p.(Leu538Ter).
4
Generic PVS1 review is permitted because germline loss of function is considered an established disease mechanism for PPM1D, although distal truncating variants require manual review for appropriate strength assignment.
Final determination:
Generic ACMG/AMP 2015 fallback rules support a Likely Pathogenic classification based on the observed combination of pathogenic criteria.
Criteria assessment
ACMG/AMP criteria review
Criteria shown when status is available
All criteria require review: For research and educational purposes only.
| Criterion | Status | Rationale | Evidence used |
|---|---|---|---|
| PVS1 | Met | This nonsense variant is predicted to truncate the PPM1D protein at p.(Leu538Ter). Generic PVS1 review is allowed because germline loss of function is considered an established disease mechanism for PPM1D, but distal truncating variants require caution under the ClinGen SVI PVS1 framework, so a downgraded PVS1 strength is more appropriate than full-strength PVS1. |
pvs1_gene_context
pvs1_variant_assessment
pvs1_generic_framework
|
| PS1 | Not assessed | No evidence was identified showing a different nucleotide change already established as pathogenic for the same protein consequence. |
clinvar
|
| PS2 | Not assessed | No confirmed de novo data with parental testing were identified. |
|
| PS3 | Not assessed | Available functional studies show that truncating PPM1D variants in the terminal region can increase protein stability or activity and alter DNA-damage-response signaling, but the retrieved studies do not directly test p.(Leu538Ter), so PS3 cannot be applied from the current evidence alone. |
PMID:23907125
PMID:25742468
PMID:29954749
PMID:37709843
|
| PS4 | Not assessed | No case-control or statistically enriched germline case series were identified for this specific variant. |
clinvar
|
| PM1 | Not met | Available hotspot review did not identify this variant in a statistically significant hotspot, so current evidence does not support PM1. |
hotspots
|
| PM2 | Met | This variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and present only once in gnomAD v4.1 at AF 6.19495e-07 (0.00006%, 1/1614218 alleles), which is below the 0.1% rarity threshold and supports PM2. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| PM3 | Not assessed | No data were identified showing this variant in trans with another pathogenic variant in a recessive disease context. |
|
| PM4 | N/A | PM4 is not applicable because this is a nonsense variant already evaluated under the loss-of-function framework rather than an in-frame length-changing variant. |
pvs1_variant_assessment
|
| PM5 | N/A | PM5 is not applicable because this criterion is for novel missense changes at a residue with a different pathogenic missense change, and this variant is a nonsense change. |
pvs1_variant_assessment
|
| PM6 | Not assessed | No assumed de novo occurrence without full parental confirmation was identified. |
|
| PP1 | Not assessed | No segregation data were identified. |
|
| PP2 | N/A | PP2 is not applicable because this variant is not a missense change. |
pvs1_variant_assessment
|
| PP3 | N/A | PP3 is not applicable because this variant is a nonsense deletion with a direct predicted truncating effect, so missense or splice prediction algorithms are not the primary evidence source for interpretation. |
pvs1_variant_assessment
|
| PP4 | Not assessed | No phenotype information was provided that would allow assessment of a highly specific PPM1D-related clinical presentation. |
|
| PP5 | Not assessed | No reputable pathogenic classification from an external clinical database was identified because this variant is absent from ClinVar. |
clinvar
|
| BA1 | Not met | The observed population frequency is far below the benign stand-alone threshold: gnomAD v4.1 AF is 6.19495e-07 (0.00006%), which is below the 1% BA1 threshold. |
gnomad_v4
|
| BS1 | Not met | The observed population frequency does not exceed the strong benign threshold: gnomAD v4.1 AF is 6.19495e-07 (0.00006%), which is below the 0.3% BS1 threshold. |
gnomad_v4
|
| BS2 | Not assessed | No evidence was identified showing this variant in healthy adult individuals at a frequency expected to argue against pathogenicity. |
gnomad_v4
|
| BS3 | Not met | Available functional studies do not show normal PPM1D function for this class of truncating variants; instead they report abnormal increased activity or altered stress-response signaling, so BS3 is not supported. |
PMID:23907125
PMID:25742468
PMID:29954749
PMID:37709843
|
| BS4 | Not assessed | No data were identified showing lack of segregation with disease in a family. |
|
| BP1 | N/A | BP1 is not applicable because this variant is not a missense change. |
pvs1_variant_assessment
|
| BP2 | Not assessed | No phase data were identified to show this variant in cis with a pathogenic variant or in trans with a pathogenic variant for a fully penetrant dominant disorder. |
|
| BP3 | Not assessed | No evidence was identified showing that this variant lies in a repetitive region without known function. |
|
| BP4 | N/A | BP4 is not applicable because this variant is a nonsense deletion and not a missense or synonymous change suited to benign computational prediction frameworks. |
pvs1_variant_assessment
|
| BP5 | Not assessed | No alternate molecular explanation was provided that would account for the phenotype independently of this variant. |
|
| BP6 | Not assessed | No reputable benign classification from an external clinical database was identified because this variant is absent from ClinVar. |
clinvar
|
| BP7 | N/A | BP7 is not applicable because this variant is neither synonymous nor an intronic change outside the canonical splice region. |
pvs1_variant_assessment
|
Disclaimer:
The content and results provided by LYFE Sciences are for research and educational purposes only and must not be used as a substitute for professional medical judgment, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making any clinical decisions.