LYFE Sciences · Project HERA
Variant Interpretation · Classification Report
Variant classification summary
NM_033360.2:c.34G>C
KRAS
· NP_203524.1:p.(Gly12Arg)
· NM_033360.2
GRCh37: chr12:25398285 C>G
·
GRCh38: chr12:25245351 C>G
Gene:
KRAS
Transcript:
NM_033360.2
Final call
Likely Pathogenic
PM5_Moderate
PM1_Moderate
PM2_Supporting
PP3_Supporting
Variant details
Gene
KRAS
Transcript
NM_033360.2
Protein
NP_203524.1:p.(Gly12Arg)
gnomAD AF
ClinVar
OncoKB
Oncogenic
Classification rationale
Interpretation summary
Generated evidence synthesis
1
The KRAS c.34G>C (p.Gly12Arg, p.G12R) variant has been observed in somatic cancers in COSMIC (COSV55497582; n=1720) and has been reported in ClinVar with pathogenic and likely pathogenic clinical submissions.
2
This variant is absent from population controls, with 0/249272 alleles in gnomAD v2.1 and no observation in gnomAD v4.1, which supports PM2 and argues against BA1 and BS1.
3
Available functional evidence is consistent with an activating KRAS effect, and OncoKB classifies this variant as oncogenic with gain-of-function, but the curated RASopathy VCEP materials did not provide sufficient approved variant-specific assay evidence to apply PS3.
4
This missense change affects codon 12 within the KRAS P-loop domain, and computational data are consistent with a damaging missense effect, with REVEL 0.821 and no predicted splice disruption by SpliceAI (maximum delta score 0.00).
Final determination:
Rule14 in the ClinGen RASopathy Expert Panel Specifications to the ACMG/AMP Variant Interpretation Guidelines for KRAS Version 2.3.0 v2.3.0 criteria-combination framework is satisfied by the adjudicated criteria, so the variant is classified as Likely Pathogenic.
Criteria assessment
ACMG/AMP criteria review
Criteria shown when status is available
All criteria require review: For research and educational purposes only.
| Criterion | Status | Rationale | Evidence used |
|---|---|---|---|
| BP7 | N/A | This is a missense variant, not a synonymous, intronic, or non-coding change, so BP7 does not apply. |
cspec
|
| PM5 | Met | This missense variant affects codon 12, where other pathogenic missense substitutions have already been established within the RASopathy VCEP framework, so PM5 is met at a moderate strength. |
cspec
vcep_s_v_i___r_a_s_o_p_a_t_h_y___v_c_e_p___v_2___a_p_p_r_o_v_e_d___f_u_n_c_t_i_o_n_a_l___s_t_u_d_i_e_s
|
| BP5 | Not assessed | No alternative molecular explanation for the phenotype in another gene was identified, so BP5 could not be assessed. |
|
| BP3 | N/A | BP3 is not applicable in this KRAS RASopathy framework because no relevant benign repetitive region is defined for this gene. |
cspec
|
| PP1 | Not assessed | No segregation data were identified, so PP1 could not be assessed. |
|
| BS1 | Not met | Population frequency is below the BS1 threshold. The variant was seen 0/249272 alleles in gnomAD v2.1 (0.00000%) and was absent from gnomAD v4.1, which is below the KRAS BS1 threshold of 0.025%. |
cspec
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| PP5 | N/A | PP5 is not used in this RASopathy VCEP framework. |
cspec
|
| BP1 | N/A | This is a missense variant, whereas BP1 in this framework is reserved for truncating variants in genes where gain-of-function missense changes are the primary disease mechanism. |
cspec
|
| BP2 | Not assessed | No data were identified showing this variant in cis or trans with another pathogenic RASopathy variant, so BP2 could not be assessed. |
|
| BA1 | Not met | Population frequency is below the BA1 threshold. The variant was seen 0/249272 alleles in gnomAD v2.1 (0.00000%) and was absent from gnomAD v4.1, which is below the KRAS BA1 threshold of 0.05%. |
cspec
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| PS3 | Not assessed | Available functional data support an activating effect in cancer systems, but no approved RASopathy VCEP functional assay evidence sufficient to apply PS3 for this specific variant was identified from the curated materials. |
oncokb
vcep_s_v_i___r_a_s_o_p_a_t_h_y___v_c_e_p___v_2___a_p_p_r_o_v_e_d___f_u_n_c_t_i_o_n_a_l___s_t_u_d_i_e_s
PMID:23455880
PMID:26037647
PMID:32792368
|
| PM4 | N/A | This is not an in-frame insertion, in-frame deletion, or stop-loss variant, so PM4 does not apply. |
cspec
|
| BS3 | N/A | BS3 is not applicable in this KRAS RASopathy framework. |
cspec
|
| PM1 | Met | This variant affects codon 12 within the KRAS P-loop functional domain, which lies in the VCEP-defined PM1 region spanning amino acids 10 to 17, supporting PM1 at a moderate strength. |
cspec
vcep_a_l_i_g_n_m_e_n_t___w_i_t_h___p_m_1___d_o_m_a_i_n_s___p_p_t_x
|
| BS2 | Not assessed | No data were identified showing this variant in an unaffected individual under the phenotypic specifications required for BS2, so BS2 could not be assessed. |
|
| PP2 | N/A | PP2 is not applicable in this KRAS RASopathy framework. |
cspec
|
| PM6 | Not assessed | No assumed de novo data were identified, so PM6 could not be assessed. |
|
| BS4 | Not assessed | No nonsegregation data were identified, so BS4 could not be assessed. |
|
| PS2 | Not assessed | No confirmed de novo occurrence data were identified, so PS2 could not be assessed. |
|
| PS4 | Not met | This variant has been observed in somatic cancers and is reported in ClinVar, but no germline RASopathy case-count or point-based evidence was identified to meet the KRAS VCEP PS4 requirements. |
cspec
clinvar
|
| PVS1 | N/A | This missense variant is not a null variant, and PVS1 is not applicable in the KRAS RASopathy specification for this change. |
cspec
pvs1_gene_context
pvs1_variant_assessment
|
| PS1 | Not assessed | No evidence was identified showing the same amino acid change established as pathogenic from a different nucleotide change, so PS1 could not be assessed. |
cspec
|
| PM3 | N/A | PM3 is not applicable in this KRAS RASopathy framework. |
cspec
|
| PP4 | N/A | PP4 is not applicable in this KRAS RASopathy framework. |
cspec
|
| PM2 | Met | This variant is absent from population controls in gnomAD, with 0/249272 alleles in gnomAD v2.1 and no observation in gnomAD v4.1, meeting the KRAS VCEP PM2_Supporting rule. |
cspec
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| BP4 | Not met | Available computational evidence does not support BP4 because the REVEL score is 0.821, which is above the benign BP4 threshold of 0.3. |
cspec
|
| PP3 | Met | Available computational evidence supports a damaging missense effect because the REVEL score is 0.821, which is above the KRAS VCEP PP3 threshold of 0.7; SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact with a maximum delta score of 0.00. |
cspec
spliceai
|
| BP6 | N/A | BP6 is not used in this KRAS RASopathy framework. |
cspec
|
Disclaimer:
The content and results provided by LYFE Sciences are for research and educational purposes only and must not be used as a substitute for professional medical judgment, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making any clinical decisions.