LYFE Sciences · Project HERA
Variant Interpretation · Classification Report
Variant classification summary
NM_002354.3:c.294C>G
EPCAM
· NP_002345.2:p.(Asp98Glu)
· NM_002354.3
GRCh37: chr2:47601056 C>G
·
GRCh38: chr2:47373917 C>G
Gene:
EPCAM
Transcript:
NM_002354.3
Final call
VUS
PM2_Moderate
Variant details
Gene
EPCAM
Transcript
NM_002354.3
Protein
NP_002345.2:p.(Asp98Glu)
gnomAD AF
ClinVar
OncoKB
Unknown Oncogenic Effect
Classification rationale
Interpretation summary
Generated evidence synthesis
1
The EPCAM c.294C>G (p.Asp98Glu; p.D98E) variant has not been identified in a statistically significant cancer hotspot and has been reported in ClinVar as a variant of uncertain significance from one clinical laboratory.
2
This variant is rare in population databases, with allele frequencies of 0.00040% in gnomAD v2.1 and 0.00037% in gnomAD v4.1, both below the 0.1% PM2 threshold, and no homozygotes were observed.
3
SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant, with a maximum delta score of 0.03.
Final determination:
Generic ACMG/AMP 2015 fallback rules do not meet benign, likely benign, likely pathogenic, or pathogenic combination thresholds, so the variant is classified as Variant of Uncertain Significance.
Criteria assessment
ACMG/AMP criteria review
Criteria shown when status is available
All criteria require review: For research and educational purposes only.
| Criterion | Status | Rationale | Evidence used |
|---|---|---|---|
| PVS1 | N/A | This missense variant does not fall within the generic PVS1 null-variant categories, and the generic PVS1 assessment states that PVS1 should not be applied for this change. |
pvs1_gene_context
pvs1_variant_assessment
pvs1_generic_framework
|
| PS1 | Not assessed | No pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant producing the same amino acid substitution was identified in the available evidence, so PS1 was not applied. |
clinvar
|
| PS2 | Not assessed | No confirmed de novo occurrence data with verified maternity and paternity were identified, so PS2 was not assessed. |
|
| PS3 | Not assessed | No well-established functional studies demonstrating a damaging effect of this specific variant were identified, so PS3 was not applied. |
oncokb
|
| PS4 | Not assessed | No case-control or enrichment data showing that this variant is more frequent in affected individuals than in controls were identified, so PS4 was not applied. |
clinvar
|
| PM1 | Not met | This variant has not been identified in a statistically significant hotspot or other established critical functional region without benign variation in the available evidence, so PM1 is not met. |
hotspots
|
| PM2 | Met | Population frequency is below the default PM2 threshold of 0.1% in both gnomAD v2.1 (0.00040%, 1/251484 alleles) and gnomAD v4.1 (0.00037%, 6/1614082 alleles), with no homozygotes observed, which supports rarity consistent with PM2. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| PM3 | Not assessed | No evidence was identified showing this variant in trans with a pathogenic variant for a recessive disorder, so PM3 was not assessed. |
|
| PM4 | N/A | This is a missense substitution and does not cause a protein length change, so PM4 is not applicable. |
|
| PM5 | Not assessed | No pathogenic missense variant at the same codon was identified in the available evidence, so PM5 was not applied. |
clinvar
|
| PM6 | Not assessed | No assumed de novo data without confirmed parentage were identified, so PM6 was not assessed. |
|
| PP1 | Not assessed | No segregation data were identified to show cosegregation with disease in affected family members, so PP1 was not applied. |
|
| PP2 | Not assessed | Available evidence does not establish that missense variation is a common disease mechanism for EPCAM, so PP2 was not applied. |
pvs1_gene_context
|
| PP3 | Not assessed | SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant (max delta score 0.03), and no validated multi-tool computational framework supporting a damaging missense effect was identified in the available evidence, so PP3 was not applied. |
spliceai
|
| PP4 | Not assessed | No phenotype or tumor profile data specific enough to support a highly specific EPCAM-related presentation were identified, so PP4 was not applied. |
|
| PP5 | Not met | ClinVar reports this variant as uncertain significance with no assertion criteria provided, which does not support a pathogenic classification by a reputable source, so PP5 is not met. |
clinvar
|
| BA1 | Not met | Population frequency is below the BA1 threshold of 1% in both gnomAD v2.1 (0.00040%) and gnomAD v4.1 (0.00037%), so BA1 is not met. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| BS1 | Not met | Population frequency is below the default BS1 threshold of 0.3% in both gnomAD v2.1 (0.00040%) and gnomAD v4.1 (0.00037%), so BS1 is not met. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| BS2 | Not assessed | No evidence was identified showing this variant in healthy adults in a manner sufficient to support BS2, so BS2 was not assessed. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| BS3 | Not assessed | No well-established functional studies demonstrating no damaging effect of this specific variant were identified, so BS3 was not applied. |
oncokb
|
| BS4 | Not assessed | No nonsegregation data were identified in affected families, so BS4 was not assessed. |
|
| BP1 | Not assessed | Although EPCAM loss of function is an established disease mechanism, available evidence does not show that missense variation is sufficiently uncommon or typically benign in this gene to support BP1, so BP1 was not applied. |
pvs1_gene_context
|
| BP2 | Not assessed | No phase data were identified showing this variant in trans with a pathogenic variant for a fully penetrant dominant condition, or in cis with another pathogenic variant, so BP2 was not assessed. |
|
| BP3 | N/A | This variant is not an in-frame deletion or insertion in a repetitive region, so BP3 is not applicable. |
|
| BP4 | Not assessed | SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant (max delta score 0.03), but no validated computational framework was identified in the cited sources to support a benign missense interpretation, so BP4 was not applied. |
spliceai
|
| BP5 | Not assessed | No alternate molecular explanation for the observed phenotype was identified, so BP5 was not assessed. |
|
| BP6 | Not met | No reputable source classified this variant as benign or likely benign in the available evidence; ClinVar lists it as uncertain significance, so BP6 is not met. |
clinvar
|
| BP7 | N/A | This variant is a missense substitution rather than a synonymous or intronic change, so BP7 is not applicable. |
spliceai
|
Disclaimer:
The content and results provided by LYFE Sciences are for research and educational purposes only and must not be used as a substitute for professional medical judgment, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making any clinical decisions.