LYFE Sciences · Project HERA
Variant Interpretation · Classification Report
Variant classification summary
NM_000059.4:c.7879A>T
BRCA2
· NP_000050.3:p.(Ile2627Phe)
· NM_000059.4
GRCh37: chr13:32936733 A>T
·
GRCh38: chr13:32362596 A>T
Gene:
BRCA2
Transcript:
NM_000059.4
Final call
PS3_Strong
PP5_Supporting
Variant details
Gene
BRCA2
Transcript
NM_000059.4
Protein
NP_000050.3:p.(Ile2627Phe)
gnomAD AF
ClinVar
OncoKB
Likely Oncogenic
Classification rationale
Interpretation summary
Generated evidence synthesis
1
The BRCA2 c.7879A>T (p.Ile2627Phe) variant has been observed in somatic cancer once in COSMIC and has been reported in ClinVar as Pathogenic, including review by the ClinGen ENIGMA BRCA1/2 expert panel.
2
This variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and present at very low frequency in gnomAD v4.1 at 4/1614168 alleles (AF 2.47806e-06; 0 homozygotes; grpmax FAF 7.9e-07), which is well below benign population thresholds but does not satisfy ENIGMA absence-based PM2.
3
Calibrated functional evidence supports a damaging effect on BRCA2 protein function, and ENIGMA Table 9 assigns PS3 Strong for c.7879A>T (p.Ile2627Phe).
4
The variant lies within the BRCA2 DNA-binding domain, while SpliceAI predicts no significant splice effect with a maximum delta score of 0.07.
Final determination:
ENIGMA BRCA1/BRCA2 Table 3 does not support a Likely Pathogenic or Pathogenic classification with 1 strong pathogenic criterion and 1 supporting pathogenic criterion, so the classification remains Uncertain Significance.
Criteria assessment
ACMG/AMP criteria review
Criteria shown when status is available
All criteria require review: For research and educational purposes only.
| Criterion | Status | Rationale | Evidence used |
|---|---|---|---|
| PVS1 | Not met | This variant is a missense substitution, not a nonsense, frameshift, canonical splice-site, initiation-codon, or exon-level loss-of-function variant, so PVS1 is not met for this BRCA2 change. |
pvs1_gene_context
pvs1_variant_assessment
cspec
|
| PS1 | Not assessed | No same-amino-acid pathogenic comparison variant was identified in the retrieved evidence, so PS1 was not independently assessed. |
cspec
vcep_specifications_v1_2_2024_11_18
|
| PS2 | N/A | No de novo data were identified, and this criterion is not applied in the BRCA2 ENIGMA framework used here. |
cspec
|
| PS3 | Met | This variant has calibrated functional evidence showing a damaging effect on BRCA2 protein function. ENIGMA Table 9 assigns PS3 Strong for c.7879A>T (p.Ile2627Phe), with three calibrated studies reported as supportive of abnormal protein function. |
vcep_specifications_table9_v1_2_2024_11_18
oncokb
|
| PS4 | Not assessed | This variant has been reported in ClinVar and once in COSMIC, and ENIGMA supplementary material lists a posterior pathogenicity of 0.9977 with IARC class 5. However, the retrieved materials do not cleanly separate prevalence-in-affected evidence from other multifactorial components for independent PS4 assignment, so PS4 was not applied in this pass. |
clinvar
vcep_supplementarytables_v1_2_2024_11_18
vcep_specifications_v1_2_2024_11_18
|
| PM1 | N/A | PM1 is not applied as a separate criterion in the BRCA2 ENIGMA framework because domain-based missense interpretation is incorporated into the PP3/BP4 bioinformatic rules. |
cspec
vcep_specifications_v1_2_2024_11_18
|
| PM2 | Not met | This variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 but present in gnomAD v4.1 at 4/1,614,168 alleles (AF 2.47806e-06; 0 homozygotes), so it is not absent from control datasets and PM2 is not met. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
cspec
|
| PM3 | Not assessed | No evidence was identified for biallelic BRCA2 disease, Fanconi anemia phenotype, or a qualifying in-trans co-occurring BRCA2 pathogenic variant, so PM3 was not assessed. |
cspec
|
| PM4 | N/A | This criterion is not applicable in the BRCA2 ENIGMA framework used here. |
cspec
|
| PM5 | Not assessed | No qualifying alternate pathogenic missense variant at the same codon was identified in the retrieved evidence, and the exon-level PM5_PTC framework is for protein-truncating variants rather than this missense substitution, so PM5 was not assessed. |
cspec
vcep_specifications_table4_v1_2_2024_11_18
vcep_specifications_v1_2_2024_11_18
|
| PM6 | N/A | This criterion is not applicable in the BRCA2 ENIGMA framework used here. |
cspec
|
| PP1 | Not assessed | No quantitative co-segregation likelihood ratio was identified, so PP1 was not assessed. |
cspec
vcep_specifications_v1_2_2024_11_18
|
| PP2 | N/A | This criterion is not applicable in the BRCA2 ENIGMA framework used here. |
cspec
|
| PP3 | Not assessed | This missense variant lies within the BRCA2 DNA-binding domain, but SpliceAI predicts no significant splice effect (max delta score 0.07, below the PP3 splice threshold of 0.2). The official BRCA2 missense PP3 rule also requires BayesDel no-AF at or above 0.30, and that score was not identified in the retrieved evidence, so PP3 was not independently applied. |
cspec
spliceai
vcep_specifications_v1_2_2024_11_18
|
| PP4 | Not met | The BRCA2 clinical-history likelihood ratio for this variant is 0.68 from 3 probands, which is below the PP4 Supporting threshold of 2.08, so PP4 is not met. |
vcep_pmid_31853058_brca2_clinical_history_lr
PMID:31853058
cspec
|
| PP5 | Met | Expert panel ClinGen ENIGMA BRCA1 and BRCA2 Variant Curation Expert Panel, ClinGen classified as Pathogenic. |
cspec
clinvar
|
| BA1 | Not met | The gnomAD v4.1 grpmax filter allele frequency is 7.9e-07, which is below the BA1 threshold of 0.001 (0.1%), so BA1 is not met. |
gnomad_v4
cspec
|
| BS1 | Not met | The gnomAD v4.1 grpmax filter allele frequency is 7.9e-07, which is below the BS1 Supporting threshold of 0.00002 and well below the BS1 Strong threshold of 0.0001, so BS1 is not met. |
gnomad_v4
cspec
|
| BS2 | Not assessed | No qualifying observations of this variant in individuals without Fanconi anemia features were identified for BRCA2 BS2 scoring, so BS2 was not assessed. |
cspec
|
| BS3 | Not met | Available calibrated functional evidence does not show normal BRCA2 protein function. Instead, ENIGMA Table 9 assigns PS3 Strong for damaging functional results, so BS3 is not met. |
vcep_specifications_table9_v1_2_2024_11_18
|
| BS4 | Not assessed | No quantitative lack-of-segregation likelihood ratio was identified, so BS4 was not assessed. |
cspec
vcep_specifications_v1_2_2024_11_18
|
| BP1 | Not met | This missense variant is within the BRCA2 DNA-binding domain (amino acids 2481-3186), so it does not meet the BP1 requirement for a missense or silent variant outside a clinically important domain. SpliceAI is low at 0.07, but the domain requirement is not satisfied. |
cspec
spliceai
vcep_specifications_v1_2_2024_11_18
|
| BP2 | N/A | This criterion is not applicable in the BRCA2 ENIGMA framework used here. |
cspec
|
| BP3 | N/A | This criterion is not applicable in the BRCA2 ENIGMA framework used here. |
cspec
|
| BP4 | Not assessed | SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact (max delta score 0.07, within the BP4 splice threshold of 0.1), and the variant is within the BRCA2 DNA-binding domain. However, the official BRCA2 missense BP4 rule also requires BayesDel no-AF at or below 0.18, and that score was not identified in the retrieved evidence, so BP4 was not independently applied. |
cspec
spliceai
vcep_specifications_v1_2_2024_11_18
|
| BP5 | Not met | The BRCA2 clinical-history likelihood ratio for this variant is 0.68 from 3 probands, which is above the BP5 Supporting threshold of 0.48, so BP5 is not met. |
vcep_pmid_31853058_brca2_clinical_history_lr
PMID:31853058
cspec
|
| BP6 | N/A | This criterion is not applicable in the BRCA2 ENIGMA framework used here. |
cspec
|
| BP7 | Not met | Although mRNA evidence in ENIGMA Table 9 notes no aberration and SpliceAI is low at 0.07, this is a missense variant within the BRCA2 DNA-binding domain, and BRCA2 BP7 for missense variants in a clinically important domain requires BS3 to be met. Because functional evidence supports PS3 Strong rather than BS3, BP7 is not met. |
vcep_specifications_table9_v1_2_2024_11_18
spliceai
cspec
vcep_specifications_v1_2_2024_11_18
|
Disclaimer:
The content and results provided by LYFE Sciences are for research and educational purposes only and must not be used as a substitute for professional medical judgment, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making any clinical decisions.