LYFE Sciences · Project HERA
Variant Interpretation · Classification Report
Variant classification summary
NM_007294.4:c.301+7G>A
BRCA1
· NP_009225.1:p.?
· NM_007294.4
GRCh37: chr17:41256878 C>T
·
GRCh38: chr17:43104861 C>T
Gene:
BRCA1
Transcript:
NM_007294.4
Final call
Likely Benign
PP3
BS3
BP6
Variant details
Gene
BRCA1
Transcript
NM_007294.4
Protein
NP_009225.1:p.?
gnomAD AF
ClinVar
OncoKB
Classification rationale
Interpretation summary
Generated evidence synthesis
1
The BRCA1 c.301+7G>A (NP_009225.1:p.?) variant has been reported in ClinVar, where the overall classification is Benign with expert panel review.
2
This variant is present in gnomAD, with AF 0.0000885 in v2.1 (25/282562 alleles; grpmax FAF 0.00010876) and AF 0.0000540 in v4.1 (87/1610834 alleles; grpmax FAF 0.00005311), so it is not absent from controls and does not meet BA1.
3
Well-established functional evidence supports no damaging effect: ENIGMA Table 9 assigns BS3 Strong based on no aberrant splicing in two studies and a calibrated study showing no functional impact.
4
In silico splicing prediction is conflicting with the functional evidence, because SpliceAI gives a maximum delta score of 0.29, which exceeds the ENIGMA PP3 threshold of 0.20 and argues against BP4.
Final determination:
With conflicting evidence present, ENIGMA Table 3 directs use of the point-based framework; PP3_Supporting (+1), BS3_Strong (-4), and BP6_Supporting (-1) sum to -4 points, which falls in the Likely Benign range.
Criteria assessment
ACMG/AMP criteria review
Criteria shown when status is available
All criteria require review: For research and educational purposes only.
| Criterion | Status | Rationale | Evidence used |
|---|---|---|---|
| PVS1 | Not met | BRCA1 is a gene in which loss of function is an established disease mechanism, but this variant is an intronic +7 substitution rather than a nonsense, frameshift, or canonical ±1,2 splice-site variant. Available functional evidence shows no aberrant splicing and no functional impact, so PVS1 was not applied. |
cspec
pvs1_gene_context
pvs1_variant_assessment
vcep_specifications_table9_v1_2_2024_11_18
|
| PS1 | Not assessed | No evidence was identified showing that this variant has the same established pathogenic protein or splicing effect as a previously classified pathogenic or likely pathogenic BRCA1 variant, so PS1 was not assessed. |
cspec
|
| PS2 | N/A | PS2 is not applicable under the BRCA1 ENIGMA specification for this review. |
cspec
|
| PS3 | Not met | Available functional studies do not support a damaging effect. ENIGMA Table 9 summarizes this variant as showing no aberrant splicing in two studies and no functional impact in a calibrated study, so PS3 was not met. |
vcep_specifications_table9_v1_2_2024_11_18
PMID:22505045
PMID:24667779
|
| PS4 | Not assessed | No case-control evidence was identified showing a statistically significant increase of this variant in affected individuals compared with controls, so PS4 was not assessed. |
cspec
clinvar
|
| PM1 | N/A | PM1 is not applicable under the BRCA1 ENIGMA specification for this intronic variant type. |
cspec
|
| PM2 | Not met | This variant is not absent from population databases. It is present in gnomAD v2.1 at AF 0.0000885 (25/282562 alleles; grpmax FAF 0.00010876) and in gnomAD v4.1 at AF 0.0000540 (87/1610834 alleles; grpmax FAF 0.00005311), so the ENIGMA PM2 absence threshold is not met. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
cspec
|
| PM3 | Not assessed | No evidence was identified for BRCA1-related Fanconi anemia with qualifying co-occurring variants in the same gene, so PM3 was not assessed. |
cspec
|
| PM4 | N/A | PM4 is not applicable under the BRCA1 ENIGMA specification for this review. |
cspec
|
| PM5 | N/A | Under the BRCA1 ENIGMA specification, PM5 is used for protein-termination-codon variants in eligible exons. This intronic +7 variant is not a protein-termination-codon variant, so PM5 is not applicable. |
cspec
vcep_specifications_table4_v1_2_2024_11_18
|
| PM6 | N/A | PM6 is not applicable under the BRCA1 ENIGMA specification for this review. |
cspec
|
| PP1 | Not assessed | No quantitative co-segregation data were identified for this variant, so PP1 was not assessed. |
cspec
|
| PP2 | N/A | PP2 is not applicable under the BRCA1 ENIGMA specification for this review. |
cspec
|
| PP3 | Met | SpliceAI predicts splice impact for this intronic variant, with a maximum delta score of 0.29. This is above the ENIGMA PP3 threshold of 0.20 for intronic variants outside the canonical ±1,2 splice sites, so PP3 is met at Supporting strength. |
spliceai
cspec
|
| PP4 | Not assessed | No calibrated multifactorial clinical-history likelihood ratio meeting ENIGMA PP4 thresholds was identified for this variant, so PP4 was not assessed. |
cspec
vcep_pmid_31853058_brca1_clinical_history_lr
PMID:31853058
|
| PP5 | N/A | PP5 is not applicable under the BRCA1 ENIGMA specification for this review. |
cspec
|
| BA1 | Not met | Population data do not reach the ENIGMA BA1 threshold. The observed grpmax FAF is 0.00010876 in gnomAD v2.1 and 0.00005311 in gnomAD v4.1, both below the BA1 cutoff of 0.001. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
cspec
|
| BS1 | Not assessed | This variant is present in gnomAD, but the available summaries do not establish a non-founder population filter allele frequency that clearly exceeds the ENIGMA BS1 thresholds. BS1 was therefore not applied from the current evidence summary. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
cspec
|
| BS2 | Not assessed | No evidence was identified showing qualifying observations in individuals without features of BRCA1-related Fanconi anemia under the ENIGMA point-based framework, so BS2 was not assessed. |
cspec
|
| BS3 | Met | Well-established functional evidence supports no damaging effect. ENIGMA Table 9 assigns BS3 Strong for this intronic variant, citing no aberrant splicing in two studies and a calibrated study showing function similar to benign control variants with no functional impact. |
vcep_specifications_table9_v1_2_2024_11_18
vcep_supplementarytables_v1_2_2024_11_18
PMID:22505045
PMID:24667779
|
| BS4 | Not assessed | No quantitative lack-of-segregation data were identified for this variant, so BS4 was not assessed. |
cspec
|
| BP1 | N/A | BP1 applies to silent, missense, or in-frame variants outside clinically important domains when no splicing effect is predicted. This intronic variant does not fit that rule, so BP1 is not applicable. |
cspec
|
| BP2 | N/A | BP2 is not applicable under the BRCA1 ENIGMA specification for this review. |
cspec
|
| BP3 | N/A | BP3 is not applicable under the BRCA1 ENIGMA specification for this review. |
cspec
|
| BP4 | Not met | BP4 is not met because SpliceAI predicts splice impact, with a maximum delta score of 0.29. This is above the ENIGMA benign threshold of 0.10 for intronic variants outside the canonical splice sites. |
spliceai
cspec
|
| BP5 | Not assessed | No calibrated multifactorial clinical-history likelihood ratio meeting ENIGMA BP5 thresholds was identified for this variant, so BP5 was not assessed. |
cspec
vcep_pmid_31853058_brca1_clinical_history_lr
PMID:31853058
|
| BP6 | Met | Expert panel ClinGen ENIGMA BRCA1 and BRCA2 Variant Curation Expert Panel, ClinGen classified as Benign. |
cspec
clinvar
|
| BP7 | Not met | This intronic +7 variant is in a position that can be considered for BP7, but BP7 Supporting requires BP4 and BP4 is not met because SpliceAI is 0.29, above the benign threshold of 0.10. The available non-damaging functional evidence is captured under BS3 rather than BP7. |
cspec
spliceai
vcep_specifications_table9_v1_2_2024_11_18
|
Disclaimer:
The content and results provided by LYFE Sciences are for research and educational purposes only and must not be used as a substitute for professional medical judgment, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making any clinical decisions.