LYFE Sciences · Project HERA
Variant Interpretation · Classification Report
Variant classification summary
NM_000314.8:c.434T>G
PTEN
· NP_000305.3:p.(Phe145Cys)
· NM_000314.8
GRCh37: chr10:89692950 T>G
·
GRCh38: chr10:87933193 T>G
Gene:
PTEN
Transcript:
NM_000314.8
Final call
VUS
PM2 supporting
PP2 supporting
PP3 supporting
Variant details
Gene
PTEN
Transcript
NM_000314.8
Protein
NP_000305.3:p.(Phe145Cys)
gnomAD AF
ClinVar
OncoKB
Unknown Oncogenic Effect
Classification rationale
Interpretation summary
Generated evidence synthesis
1
The PTEN c.434T>G (p.Phe145Cys; p.F145C) variant has been observed once in somatic cancers in COSMIC and has not been reported in ClinVar.
2
This variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and gnomAD v4.1, which is below the PTEN PM2 threshold of 0.001% and supports PM2 at Supporting strength.
3
In the PTEN saturation mutagenesis phosphatase assay, p.Phe145Cys had a cumulative activity score of -0.669, which is above the PTEN PS3_Moderate cutoff of <= -1.11 and below the BS3 threshold of >0, so the current functional evidence does not independently meet PS3 or BS3.
4
Computational evidence supports a deleterious protein effect because the REVEL score is 0.861, above the PTEN PP3 threshold of >0.7, while SpliceAI predicts no significant splice effect with a maximum delta score of 0.01.
Final determination:
No criteria-combination rule matched the adjudicated criteria in the Richards et.al., 2015 - Combining rules v3.2.0 framework, so the variant remains a Variant of Uncertain Significance pending human review.
Criteria assessment
ACMG/AMP criteria review
Criteria shown when status is available
All criteria require review: For research and educational purposes only.
| Criterion | Status | Rationale | Evidence used |
|---|---|---|---|
| PVS1 | N/A | This variant is a missense substitution, p.(Phe145Cys), and does not fall into the PTEN null-variant categories used for PVS1 such as nonsense, frameshift, or canonical +/-1,2 splice variants. |
pvs1_gene_context
pvs1_variant_assessment
cspec
vcep_pvs1_decisiontree_pten
|
| PS1 | Not assessed | No previously established pathogenic variant causing the same amino acid change was identified in the available evidence, so PS1 was not assessed. |
clinvar
cspec
|
| PS2 | Not assessed | No de novo data were identified for this variant, so PS2 was not assessed. |
cspec
|
| PS3 | Not met | Functional testing from the PTEN saturation mutagenesis assay showed a cumulative phosphatase activity score of -0.669 for p.Phe145Cys, which is above the PTEN PS3_Moderate threshold of <= -1.11. No additional validated functional study showing splicing disruption or clearly damaging PTEN function was identified, so PS3 is not met. |
vcep_mmc2
cspec
|
| PS4 | Not assessed | The available evidence does not provide germline proband counts, phenotype specificity scoring, or a case-control analysis showing enrichment in affected individuals, so PS4 was not assessed. |
clinvar
cspec
|
| PM1 | Not met | This missense variant affects residue 145, which is outside the PTEN catalytic motif residues defined for PM1 (90-94, 123-130, and 166-168). Available evidence also does not show a confirmed statistically significant hotspot for this residue, so PM1 is not met. |
cspec
hotspots
|
| PM2 | Met | This variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and gnomAD v4.1, which is below the PTEN PM2 threshold of <0.00001 (0.001%) and consistent with an ultra-rare allele in population databases. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
cspec
|
| PM3 | N/A | PM3 is not applicable in the PTEN VCEP framework. |
cspec
|
| PM4 | Not met | This variant is a missense substitution and does not cause an in-frame protein length change or stop-loss, so PM4 is not met. |
cspec
|
| PM5 | Not assessed | No previously established pathogenic missense variant at residue Phe145 was identified in the available evidence, so PM5 was not assessed. |
clinvar
cspec
|
| PM6 | Not assessed | No assumed de novo observations were identified for this variant, so PM6 was not assessed. |
cspec
|
| PP1 | Not assessed | No segregation data were identified for this variant, so PP1 was not assessed. |
cspec
|
| PP2 | Met | This variant is a missense change in PTEN, a gene for which the PTEN VCEP allows PP2 because benign missense variation is relatively low and missense change is an established disease mechanism. |
cspec
|
| PP3 | Met | Computational evidence supports a deleterious effect for this missense variant because the REVEL score is 0.861, which is above the PTEN PP3 threshold of >0.7. SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact with a maximum delta score of 0.01, so the in silico concern is for protein effect rather than splicing. |
cspec
spliceai
|
| PP4 | N/A | PP4 is not applicable in the PTEN VCEP framework because phenotype specificity is incorporated into PS4 specifications. |
cspec
|
| PP5 | N/A | PP5 is not applicable in the PTEN VCEP framework. |
cspec
|
| BA1 | Not met | This variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and v4.1 and therefore does not exceed the PTEN BA1 threshold of >0.00056 (0.056%). |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
cspec
|
| BS1 | Not met | This variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and v4.1 and therefore does not reach the PTEN BS1 thresholds of 0.0000043 to 0.000043 for Supporting or 0.000043 to 0.00056 for Strong evidence. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
cspec
|
| BS2 | Not met | No observation of this variant in a healthy or PTEN-hamartoma-tumor-syndrome-unaffected homozygous individual was identified, so BS2 is not met. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
cspec
|
| BS3 | Not met | Available functional evidence does not show normal PTEN function. In the Mighell assay, the cumulative phosphatase activity score for p.Phe145Cys is -0.669, which is below the PTEN BS3_Supporting threshold of >0, so BS3 is not met. |
vcep_mmc2
cspec
|
| BS4 | Not assessed | No lack-of-segregation evidence was identified for this variant, so BS4 was not assessed. |
cspec
|
| BP1 | N/A | BP1 is not applicable in the PTEN VCEP framework. |
cspec
|
| BP2 | Not assessed | No phase data were identified showing this variant in trans with a pathogenic PTEN variant or in cis/unknown phase in at least three observations with different pathogenic PTEN variants, so BP2 was not assessed. |
cspec
|
| BP3 | N/A | BP3 is not applicable in the PTEN VCEP framework. |
cspec
|
| BP4 | Not met | Computational evidence does not support a benign protein effect for this missense variant because the REVEL score is 0.861, which is above the PTEN BP4 threshold of <0.5. Although SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact with a maximum delta score of 0.01, the missense prediction does not support BP4. |
cspec
spliceai
|
| BP5 | Not assessed | No evidence was identified that this variant was found in a case with a separate highly penetrant molecular diagnosis and a non-overlapping clinical history, so BP5 was not assessed. |
cspec
|
| BP6 | N/A | BP6 is not applicable in the PTEN VCEP framework. |
cspec
|
| BP7 | N/A | BP7 applies to synonymous or qualifying intronic variants and is not applicable to this missense variant. |
cspec
|
Disclaimer:
The content and results provided by LYFE Sciences are for research and educational purposes only and must not be used as a substitute for professional medical judgment, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making any clinical decisions.