LYFE Sciences · Project HERA
Variant Interpretation · Classification Report
Variant classification summary
NM_000465.4:c.62G>T
BARD1
· NP_000456.2:p.(Arg21Leu)
· NM_000465.4
GRCh37: chr2:215674232 C>A
·
GRCh38: chr2:214809508 C>A
Gene:
BARD1
Transcript:
NM_000465.4
Final call
VUS
PM2 supporting
BP4 supporting
Variant details
Gene
BARD1
Transcript
NM_000465.4
Protein
NP_000456.2:p.(Arg21Leu)
gnomAD AF
ClinVar
OncoKB
Unknown Oncogenic Effect
Classification rationale
Interpretation summary
Generated evidence synthesis
1
The BARD1 c.62G>T (p.Arg21Leu) variant has not been identified in a statistically significant cancer hotspot and has been reported in ClinVar as a variant of uncertain significance by a single submitter.
2
This variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and has 0/1,601,354 alleles in gnomAD v4.1 (AF 0.0%), which is below the 0.1% threshold used for PM2 and supports rarity in population databases.
3
Available computational evidence does not support a damaging effect, with a REVEL score of 0.16 and a BayesDel score of -0.392235, supporting benign computational evidence rather than pathogenic computational evidence.
Final determination:
Generic ACMG/AMP 2015 fallback rules identified both pathogenic and benign evidence, so the overall classification remains Variant of Uncertain Significance because the evidence is conflicting.
Criteria assessment
ACMG/AMP criteria review
Criteria shown when status is available
All criteria require review: For research and educational purposes only.
| Criterion | Status | Rationale | Evidence used |
|---|---|---|---|
| PVS1 | N/A | This is a missense variant, p.(Arg21Leu), and it does not fall into the generic PVS1 null-variant categories of nonsense, frameshift, or canonical +/-1,2 splice variants. Although loss of function is an established disease mechanism for BARD1, available evidence does not support applying PVS1 to this specific variant. |
pvs1_gene_context
pvs1_variant_assessment
pvs1_generic_framework
|
| PS1 | Not assessed | No evidence was identified showing that another nucleotide change causing the same amino acid substitution, p.(Arg21Leu), has already been established as pathogenic or likely pathogenic. |
|
| PS2 | Not assessed | No confirmed de novo observation with verified maternity and paternity was identified. |
|
| PS3 | Not assessed | No well-established functional study showing a damaging effect of this specific variant was identified. |
oncokb
|
| PS4 | Not assessed | No case-control enrichment or multiple independent affected observations were identified to show that this variant is significantly increased in affected individuals over controls. |
clinvar
|
| PM1 | Not met | This variant has not been identified in a statistically significant hotspot, and available evidence does not show that codon 21 lies in a well-established critical region without benign variation. |
hotspots
|
| PM2 | Met | This variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and has 0/1,601,354 alleles in gnomAD v4.1 (AF 0.0%), which is below the 0.1% rarity threshold used for PM2 in this framework. This supports that the variant is rare in population databases. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| PM3 | N/A | PM3 is used for recessive disorders when pathogenic variants are observed in trans. That evidence model is not applicable to this BARD1 hereditary cancer susceptibility evaluation. |
|
| PM4 | N/A | This is a missense substitution and does not change protein length or create an in-frame insertion or deletion. |
|
| PM5 | Not assessed | No evidence was identified showing that a different missense change at the same amino acid residue has already been established as pathogenic or likely pathogenic. |
|
| PM6 | Not assessed | No assumed de novo observation without confirmed parentage was identified. |
|
| PP1 | Not assessed | No segregation data were identified to show that this variant tracks with disease in affected family members. |
|
| PP2 | Not assessed | Available evidence does not establish that pathogenic missense variation is a common disease mechanism in BARD1 or that this gene has a low rate of benign missense variation sufficient for PP2. |
|
| PP3 | Not met | Available computational evidence does not support a deleterious effect. The observed missense prediction scores are low and do not support applying pathogenic computational evidence. |
|
| PP4 | Not assessed | No phenotype or family history data were identified showing a highly specific clinical presentation attributable to a single genetic cause for this variant assessment. |
|
| PP5 | Not met | ClinVar reports this variant as uncertain significance rather than pathogenic or likely pathogenic, so external classification evidence does not support PP5. |
clinvar
|
| BA1 | Not met | Population frequency does not meet the standalone benign threshold. The variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and has 0/1,601,354 alleles in gnomAD v4.1, which is below the 1% BA1 threshold. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| BS1 | Not met | Population frequency does not support a benign interpretation. The variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and has 0/1,601,354 alleles in gnomAD v4.1, which is below the 0.3% BS1 threshold. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| BS2 | Not assessed | No evidence was identified showing this variant in healthy adult individuals in a manner sufficient to support a benign classification. |
|
| BS3 | Not assessed | No well-established functional study showing a normal or benign effect for this specific variant was identified. |
oncokb
|
| BS4 | Not assessed | No segregation data were identified showing lack of segregation with disease. |
|
| BP1 | Not assessed | Available evidence does not establish that missense variants in BARD1 are generally less likely to be pathogenic than truncating variants to a degree sufficient for BP1. |
pvs1_gene_context
|
| BP2 | Not assessed | No phase data were identified showing this variant in trans with a pathogenic variant for a fully penetrant dominant disorder, or in cis with a pathogenic variant in a way that would support BP2. |
|
| BP3 | N/A | This is not an in-frame insertion or deletion in a repetitive region. |
|
| BP4 | Met | Available computational evidence favors a benign effect for this missense change. REVEL is 0.16 and BayesDel is -0.392235, which do not support a damaging protein effect. |
|
| BP5 | Not assessed | No alternate molecular explanation was identified for the phenotype that would support BP5. |
|
| BP6 | Not met | ClinVar does not report this variant as benign or likely benign, so external classification evidence does not support BP6. |
clinvar
|
| BP7 | N/A | BP7 applies to synonymous or certain intronic variants without predicted splice impact. This variant is a missense substitution and BP7 does not apply. |
|
Disclaimer:
The content and results provided by LYFE Sciences are for research and educational purposes only and must not be used as a substitute for professional medical judgment, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making any clinical decisions.