LYFE Sciences · Project HERA
Variant Interpretation · Classification Report
Variant classification summary
NM_000455.5:c.22C>G
STK11
· NP_000446.1:p.(Gln8Glu)
· NM_000455.5
GRCh37: chr19:1206934 C>G
·
GRCh38: chr19:1206935 C>G
Gene:
STK11
Transcript:
NM_000455.5
Final call
VUS
PM2 supporting
BP4 supporting
Variant details
Gene
STK11
Transcript
NM_000455.5
Protein
NP_000446.1:p.(Gln8Glu)
gnomAD AF
ClinVar
OncoKB
Unknown Oncogenic Effect
Classification rationale
Interpretation summary
Generated evidence synthesis
1
The STK11 c.22C>G (p.Gln8Glu) variant has been reported in ClinVar as uncertain significance by five clinical laboratory submissions.
2
This variant is very rare in population databases, with AF 4.6322e-06 in gnomAD v2.1 and AF 2.50785e-06 in gnomAD v4.1, supporting rarity but not a benign frequency threshold.
3
Computational evidence supports no significant impact on splicing or protein function, with SpliceAI max delta score 0.00, REVEL 0.032, and BayesDel -0.435498.
Final determination:
Generic ACMG/AMP 2015 fallback rules identified both pathogenic and benign evidence, so the overall classification remains Variant of Uncertain Significance because the evidence is conflicting.
Criteria assessment
ACMG/AMP criteria review
Criteria shown when status is available
All criteria require review: For research and educational purposes only.
| Criterion | Status | Rationale | Evidence used |
|---|---|---|---|
| PVS1 | N/A | STK11 loss of function is an established disease mechanism, but NM_000455.5:c.22C>G is a missense variant p.(Gln8Glu)/p.(Q8E) and does not fall into the generic PVS1 null-variant categories of nonsense, frameshift, or canonical +/-1,2 splice variants. |
pvs1_gene_context
pvs1_variant_assessment
pvs1_generic_framework
|
| PS1 | Not assessed | No evidence was identified showing that this amino acid change has already been established as pathogenic from a different nucleotide change. |
clinvar
|
| PS2 | Not assessed | No confirmed de novo occurrence with parental confirmation was identified for this variant. |
|
| PS3 | Not assessed | No validated functional study demonstrating a damaging effect of this specific STK11 variant was identified. |
|
| PS4 | Not assessed | This variant is present in ClinVar, but no proband count, case-control enrichment, or other case-level data sufficient to show increased prevalence in affected individuals was identified. |
clinvar
|
| PM1 | Not met | Available evidence does not place p.(Gln8Glu) in a statistically significant hotspot, and no critical STK11 functional region at residue 8 was identified from the reviewed sources. |
hotspots
|
| PM2 | Met | This variant is very rare in population databases, with AF 4.6322e-06 in gnomAD v2.1 and AF 2.50785e-06 in gnomAD v4.1, both below the 0.1% PM2 threshold used for non-VCEP review. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| PM3 | N/A | PM3 is not applicable because STK11-related Peutz-Jeghers syndrome is not assessed here as a recessive disorder requiring trans observations. |
PMID:20301443
PMID:25645574
|
| PM4 | N/A | PM4 is not applicable because this variant is a missense substitution and does not change protein length through an in-frame insertion, deletion, or stop-loss event. |
pvs1_variant_assessment
|
| PM5 | Not assessed | No established pathogenic missense comparator at codon 8 was identified from the reviewed evidence. |
clinvar
|
| PM6 | Not assessed | No assumed de novo occurrence without full parental confirmation was identified for this variant. |
|
| PP1 | Not assessed | No segregation data were identified for this variant in affected family members. |
|
| PP2 | Not assessed | The reviewed evidence did not provide a gene-specific basis to apply PP2 for this missense variant. |
|
| PP3 | Not met | Available computational evidence does not support a deleterious effect: SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact with max delta score 0.00, REVEL is low at 0.032, and BayesDel is negative at -0.435498. |
spliceai
revel
bayesdel
|
| PP4 | Not assessed | No patient-specific phenotype information was available to determine whether the clinical presentation is highly specific for STK11-related disease. |
PMID:20301443
PMID:25645574
|
| PP5 | Not met | ClinVar reports this variant as uncertain significance rather than as a pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant from a reputable source. |
clinvar
|
| BA1 | Not met | Population frequency does not reach the standalone benign threshold: AF is 4.6322e-06 in gnomAD v2.1 and 2.50785e-06 in gnomAD v4.1, both far below 1%. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| BS1 | Not met | Population frequency does not exceed the strong benign threshold: AF is 4.6322e-06 in gnomAD v2.1 and 2.50785e-06 in gnomAD v4.1, both far below 0.3%. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| BS2 | Not assessed | No evidence was identified showing this variant in well-phenotyped healthy adult individuals in a way that would strongly argue against pathogenicity. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| BS3 | Not assessed | No validated functional study demonstrating normal STK11 function for this specific variant was identified. |
|
| BS4 | Not assessed | No non-segregation data were identified for this variant. |
|
| BP1 | Not assessed | The reviewed evidence did not provide a sufficient gene-specific basis to apply BP1 to this missense variant. |
|
| BP2 | Not assessed | No phase data or second-variant data were identified to support BP2. |
|
| BP3 | N/A | BP3 is not applicable because this variant is not an in-frame insertion or deletion in a repetitive region. |
pvs1_variant_assessment
|
| BP4 | Met | Multiple computational results support no significant impact: SpliceAI predicts no significant splice effect with max delta score 0.00, REVEL is 0.032, and BayesDel is -0.435498, together arguing against a deleterious effect. |
spliceai
revel
bayesdel
|
| BP5 | Not assessed | No alternate molecular explanation for an affected individual's phenotype was identified. |
|
| BP6 | Not met | ClinVar does not report this variant as benign or likely benign from a reputable source; the available submissions classify it as uncertain significance. |
clinvar
|
| BP7 | N/A | BP7 is not applicable because this is a missense variant rather than a synonymous or deep intronic change. |
spliceai
|
Disclaimer:
The content and results provided by LYFE Sciences are for research and educational purposes only and must not be used as a substitute for professional medical judgment, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making any clinical decisions.