LYFE Sciences · Project HERA
Variant Interpretation · Classification Report
Variant classification summary
NM_001354609.1:c.770A>G
BRAF
· NP_001341538.1:p.(Gln257Arg)
· NM_001354609.1
GRCh37: chr7:140501302 T>C
·
GRCh38: chr7:140801502 T>C
Gene:
BRAF
Transcript:
NM_001354609.1
Final call
VUS
PP5 supporting
PM1 moderate
PP3 supporting
PS3 moderate
Variant details
Gene
BRAF
Transcript
NM_001354609.1
Protein
NP_001341538.1:p.(Gln257Arg)
gnomAD AF
ClinVar
OncoKB
Likely Oncogenic
Classification rationale
Interpretation summary
Generated evidence synthesis
1
The BRAF c.770A>G (p.Gln257Arg) variant has been reported in ClinVar as pathogenic, including expert panel review.
2
This variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and is present only once in gnomAD v4.1 (1/1,613,978 alleles; AF 0.00006%), which is below the BS1 threshold of 0.025% and the BA1 threshold of 0.05%.
3
In VCEP-approved functional studies, Q257R showed abnormal results in MEK activation, ERK activation, and BRAF kinase activity assays, consistent with a damaging gain-of-function effect.
4
Computational evidence supports a deleterious missense effect, with REVEL 0.838 above the PP3 threshold of 0.7, a positive BayesDel score of 0.476355, and SpliceAI showing only a low predicted splice effect with a maximum delta score of 0.21.
Final determination:
No criteria-combination rule matched the adjudicated criteria in the ClinGen RASopathy Expert Panel Specifications to the ACMG/AMP Variant Interpretation Guidelines for BRAF Version 2.3.0 v2.3.0 framework, so the variant remains a Variant of Uncertain Significance pending human review.
Criteria assessment
ACMG/AMP criteria review
Criteria shown when status is available
All criteria require review: For research and educational purposes only.
| Criterion | Status | Rationale | Evidence used |
|---|---|---|---|
| PM5 | Not assessed | Available evidence does not establish a different pathogenic or likely pathogenic missense change at codon 257 in BRAF or RAF1, so this codon-based criterion cannot be confirmed from the reviewed evidence. |
cspec
clinvar
|
| BP1 | N/A | This is a missense variant, whereas this criterion is specified here for truncating loss-of-function variants in a gain-of-function disease context. |
cspec
|
| BP4 | Not met | Computational evidence does not support a benign effect. REVEL is 0.838, which is above the benign BP4 threshold of 0.3, and BayesDel is positive at 0.476355. |
cspec
revel
bayesdel
spliceai
|
| PS2 | Not assessed | Published reports associated with this variant and cardio-facio-cutaneous syndrome were identified, but the reviewed evidence did not document confirmed maternity and paternity for an exact-variant de novo occurrence, so this criterion cannot be assigned at this time. |
cspec
clinvar
PMID:16439621
PMID:17551924
|
| PP5 | Met | Expert panel ClinGen RASopathy Variant Curation Expert Panel classified as Pathogenic. |
cspec
clinvar
|
| BP2 | Not assessed | No evidence was identified that this variant occurs with an alternative molecular diagnosis in cis or trans in a way that supports this criterion. |
cspec
|
| PP2 | Not assessed | This criterion requires a BRAF missense constraint metric above the specified threshold, but the reviewed evidence did not provide the gene-level missense z score needed to confirm the rule. |
cspec
|
| BS3 | N/A | This expert panel framework does not apply BS3 for this gene specification. |
cspec
|
| PM1 | Met | This missense variant is located in exon 6, and the RASopathy expert panel explicitly permits PM1 at moderate strength for variants in exon 6 as a critical and well-established functional region. |
cspec
|
| PP3 | Met | Computational evidence supports a damaging effect. REVEL is 0.838, which is above the PP3 threshold of 0.7, BayesDel is positive at 0.476355, and SpliceAI shows only a low predicted splice effect with a maximum delta score of 0.21, supporting interpretation primarily as a deleterious missense change. |
cspec
revel
bayesdel
spliceai
|
| BP5 | Not assessed | No alternate molecular explanation for the phenotype was identified in the reviewed evidence. |
cspec
|
| PM3 | N/A | This criterion is for recessive disorders and is not applicable in this framework. |
cspec
|
| PP4 | N/A | This expert panel framework does not apply PP4 for this condition because phenotype specificity is addressed through PS4-based specifications. |
cspec
|
| PM4 | N/A | This is a missense substitution and does not change protein length, so this criterion for in-frame length changes or stop-loss variants does not apply. |
cspec
|
| BS4 | Not assessed | No family data showing lack of segregation were identified for this variant. |
cspec
|
| PM2 | Not met | This variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 but is present in gnomAD v4.1 at 1/1,613,978 alleles (AF 6.195871319187746e-07; 0.00006%), so it is not absent from controls and does not meet this VCEP PM2 rule. |
cspec
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| BP6 | N/A | This criterion is not used by this expert panel framework. |
cspec
|
| BS1 | Not met | Population frequency is far below the BS1 threshold. The highest observed frequency is 0.00008% in the European non-Finnish population, which is below the BS1 threshold of 0.025%. |
cspec
gnomad_v4
|
| BP7 | N/A | This is not a synonymous, intronic, or non-coding variant, so this criterion does not apply. |
cspec
|
| BS2 | Not assessed | No evidence was identified that this variant is observed in healthy individuals in a manner that satisfies the RASopathy point-based BS2 specification. |
cspec
gnomad_v4
|
| PS1 | Not assessed | The reviewed evidence did not establish a previously classified pathogenic variant producing the same amino acid change through a different nucleotide change, so this criterion cannot be confirmed from the current record. |
cspec
clinvar
|
| BA1 | Not met | Population frequency is well below the BA1 threshold. The highest observed frequency is 0.00008%, which is below the BA1 threshold of 0.05%. |
cspec
gnomad_v4
|
| BP3 | N/A | This criterion is not applicable in this expert panel framework. |
cspec
|
| PM6 | Not assessed | Published reports suggest this variant has been observed in affected individuals, but the reviewed evidence did not provide sufficient patient-level documentation to score an assumed de novo occurrence under the RASopathy point framework. |
cspec
clinvar
PMID:16439621
PMID:17551924
|
| PS3 | Met | VCEP-approved functional studies show abnormal effects in more than one approved assay for this variant. Q257R is listed as pathogenic in MEK activation, ERK activation, and BRAF kinase activity assays, supporting a damaging gain-of-function effect. |
cspec
vcep_svi_rasopathy_vcep_v2_approved_functional_studies
|
| PP1 | Not assessed | No informative meioses showing segregation with disease were identified for this variant. |
cspec
|
| PS4 | Not assessed | This variant has been reported in affected individuals and is classified as pathogenic in ClinVar, but the reviewed evidence did not establish the exact number of independent affected probands needed to score the RASopathy PS4 point framework. |
cspec
clinvar
PMID:16439621
PMID:16474404
PMID:17551924
|
| PVS1 | N/A | This variant is a missense substitution and does not fall within the null-variant categories used for PVS1 assessment. |
cspec
pvs1_gene_context
pvs1_variant_assessment
|
Disclaimer:
The content and results provided by LYFE Sciences are for research and educational purposes only and must not be used as a substitute for professional medical judgment, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making any clinical decisions.