LYFE Sciences · Project HERA
Variant Interpretation · Classification Report
Variant classification summary
NM_002524.4:c.368G>A
NRAS
· NP_002515.1:p.(Arg123Lys)
· NM_002524.4
GRCh37: chr1:115252272 C>T
·
GRCh38: chr1:114709651 C>T
Gene:
NRAS
Transcript:
NM_002524.4
Final call
VUS
PM2 supporting
PP3 supporting
Variant details
Gene
NRAS
Transcript
NM_002524.4
Protein
NP_002515.1:p.(Arg123Lys)
gnomAD AF
ClinVar
OncoKB
Unknown Oncogenic Effect
Classification rationale
Interpretation summary
Generated evidence synthesis
1
The NRAS c.368G>A (p.Arg123Lys) variant has not been observed in COSMIC and is reported in ClinVar as uncertain significance, including an expert panel submission from the ClinGen RASopathy Variant Curation Expert Panel.
2
This variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and gnomAD v4.1, supporting rarity in the general population and meeting the NRAS RASopathy VCEP PM2_Supporting rule.
3
The reviewed RASopathy VCEP functional study materials identify approved assay types for NRAS, but no variant-specific approved assay result for p.Arg123Lys was identified, so PS3 is not currently supported.
4
In silico evidence supports a deleterious missense effect, with REVEL 0.759 above the NRAS RASopathy VCEP PP3 threshold of 0.7, BayesDel 0.166482 directionally consistent with a damaging prediction, and SpliceAI predicting no significant splice impact with a maximum delta score of 0.00.
Final determination:
No criteria-combination rule matched the adjudicated criteria in the ClinGen RASopathy Expert Panel Specifications to the ACMG/AMP Variant Interpretation Guidelines for NRAS Version 2.3.0 v2.3.0 framework, so the variant remains a Variant of Uncertain Significance pending human review.
Criteria assessment
ACMG/AMP criteria review
Criteria shown when status is available
All criteria require review: For research and educational purposes only.
| Criterion | Status | Rationale | Evidence used |
|---|---|---|---|
| PVS1 | N/A | This is a missense variant, and the NRAS RASopathy VCEP does not apply PVS1 to this variant type. The generic PVS1 scaffold also indicates that this change does not fall into a null-variant category such as nonsense, frameshift, or canonical splice-site loss. |
cspec
pvs1_variant_assessment
|
| PS1 | Not met | No previously established pathogenic variant producing the same amino acid change, p.Arg123Lys, was identified in the reviewed evidence, so PS1 is not supported. |
cspec
clinvar
|
| PS2 | Not assessed | No confirmed de novo occurrence with maternity and paternity established was identified for this variant, so PS2 cannot be assessed from the available evidence. |
cspec
clinvar
|
| PS3 | Not assessed | The reviewed RASopathy VCEP functional study materials list approved assay types for NRAS, but no variant-specific approved assay result for p.Arg123Lys was identified, so PS3 is not currently supported. |
cspec
vcep_svi_rasopathy_vcep_v2_approved_functional_studies
|
| PS4 | Not assessed | This variant is absent from gnomAD, satisfying the PM2 prerequisite for PS4 consideration, but no usable count of unrelated affected individuals or point-based case evidence was identified, so PS4 cannot be assessed. |
cspec
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
clinvar
|
| PM1 | Not met | Residue Arg123 is outside the NRAS RASopathy VCEP PM1 domains (P-loop amino acids 10-17, Switch I amino acids 25-40, Switch II amino acids 57-64, and SAK amino acids 145-156), so PM1 is not met. |
cspec
|
| PM2 | Met | This variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and gnomAD v4.1, which meets the NRAS RASopathy VCEP PM2 threshold requiring absence from controls. |
cspec
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| PM3 | N/A | PM3 is not applicable in the NRAS RASopathy VCEP framework. |
cspec
|
| PM4 | N/A | This is a missense substitution and does not cause an in-frame insertion, in-frame deletion, or stop-loss change, so PM4 is not applicable. |
cspec
|
| PM5 | Not met | No different pathogenic or likely pathogenic missense change at codon 123 was identified in the reviewed evidence, so PM5 is not supported. |
cspec
clinvar
|
| PM6 | Not assessed | No unconfirmed de novo report with sufficient phenotype context was identified for this variant, so PM6 cannot be assessed from the available evidence. |
cspec
clinvar
|
| PP1 | Not assessed | No segregation data were identified for this variant, so PP1 cannot be assessed. |
cspec
clinvar
|
| PP2 | N/A | PP2 is not applicable in the NRAS RASopathy VCEP framework. |
cspec
|
| PP3 | Met | Computational evidence supports a deleterious effect. REVEL is 0.759, which is above the NRAS RASopathy VCEP PP3 threshold of 0.7, SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact with a maximum delta score of 0.00, and the available BayesDel score is 0.166482, which is directionally consistent with a damaging missense prediction. |
cspec
revel
spliceai
bayesdel
|
| PP4 | N/A | PP4 is not applicable in the NRAS RASopathy VCEP framework because phenotype-based evidence is handled through other criteria such as PS4. |
cspec
|
| PP5 | N/A | PP5 is not used in this VCEP framework. |
cspec
|
| BA1 | Not met | This variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and gnomAD v4.1, which is below the NRAS RASopathy VCEP BA1 threshold of 0.05%, so BA1 is not met. |
cspec
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| BS1 | Not met | This variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and gnomAD v4.1, which is below the NRAS RASopathy VCEP BS1 threshold of 0.025%, so BS1 is not met. |
cspec
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| BS2 | Not met | No observations of this variant in unaffected individuals suitable for NRAS RASopathy VCEP BS2 scoring were identified, so BS2 is not met. |
cspec
clinvar
|
| BS3 | N/A | BS3 is not applicable in the NRAS RASopathy VCEP framework. |
cspec
|
| BS4 | Not assessed | No non-segregation data or unaffected carrier relatives were identified for this variant, so BS4 cannot be assessed. |
cspec
clinvar
|
| BP1 | N/A | BP1 in the NRAS RASopathy VCEP framework is reserved for truncating or other loss-of-function variant types in genes where gain-of-function missense variants are the primary disease mechanism. This variant is missense, so BP1 is not applicable. |
cspec
pvs1_variant_assessment
|
| BP2 | Not assessed | No evidence was identified that this variant occurs in cis or trans with an alternative pathogenic RASopathy variant with sufficient phenotype context, so BP2 cannot be assessed. |
cspec
clinvar
|
| BP3 | N/A | BP3 is not applicable in the NRAS RASopathy VCEP framework. |
cspec
|
| BP4 | Not met | Computational evidence does not support a benign interpretation. REVEL is 0.759, which is above the NRAS RASopathy VCEP BP4 benign threshold of 0.3, SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact with a maximum delta score of 0.00, and the available BayesDel score of 0.166482 does not provide benign support. |
cspec
revel
spliceai
bayesdel
|
| BP5 | Not assessed | No alternative molecular explanation or phenotype-discordant diagnosis was identified that would support BP5, so this criterion cannot be assessed. |
cspec
clinvar
|
| BP6 | N/A | BP6 is not used in this VCEP framework. |
cspec
|
| BP7 | N/A | This is not a synonymous, intronic, or non-coding variant, so BP7 is not applicable. |
cspec
spliceai
|
Disclaimer:
The content and results provided by LYFE Sciences are for research and educational purposes only and must not be used as a substitute for professional medical judgment, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making any clinical decisions.