LYFE Sciences · Project HERA
Variant Interpretation · Classification Report
Variant classification summary
NM_001354609.1:c.1796C>G
BRAF
· NP_001341538.1:p.(Thr599Arg)
· NM_001354609.1
GRCh37: chr7:140453139 G>C
·
GRCh38: chr7:140753339 G>C
Gene:
BRAF
Transcript:
NM_001354609.1
Final call
VUS
PS3 moderate
PM1 moderate
PM2 supporting
PP5 supporting
Variant details
Gene
BRAF
Transcript
NM_001354609.1
Protein
NP_001341538.1:p.(Thr599Arg)
gnomAD AF
ClinVar
OncoKB
Oncogenic
Classification rationale
Interpretation summary
Generated evidence synthesis
1
The BRAF c.1796C>G (p.Thr599Arg) variant has been reported in ClinVar as pathogenic, including an expert panel pathogenic classification, and is also represented in curated cancer variant resources.
2
This variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and gnomAD v4.1, which supports rarity in population reference datasets.
3
In approved functional studies, this variant was classified as pathogenic in both MEK activation and ERK activation assays, supporting abnormal MAPK pathway signaling consistent with the disease mechanism.
4
In silico evidence does not meet the BRAF RASopathy thresholds for PP3 or BP4 because REVEL is 0.359, SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact with a maximum delta score of 0.00, and BayesDel is 0.308415.
Final determination:
No criteria-combination rule matched the adjudicated criteria in the ClinGen RASopathy Expert Panel Specifications to the ACMG/AMP Variant Interpretation Guidelines for BRAF Version 2.3.0 v2.3.0 framework, so the variant remains a Variant of Uncertain Significance pending human review.
Criteria assessment
ACMG/AMP criteria review
Criteria shown when status is available
All criteria require review: For research and educational purposes only.
| Criterion | Status | Rationale | Evidence used |
|---|---|---|---|
| PVS1 | N/A | This is a missense variant, and the BRAF RASopathy specification does not apply PVS1 to this variant type. |
cspec
pvs1_gene_context
pvs1_variant_assessment
|
| PS1 | Not assessed | No directly reviewed evidence established that this same amino acid change has already been classified as pathogenic from an independent nucleotide change or from an approved analogous RAF position analysis. |
cspec
vcep_raf_alignment
|
| PS2 | Not assessed | No confirmed de novo occurrence with the point threshold required by the BRAF RASopathy specification was directly established from the reviewed evidence. |
cspec
PMID:19206169
PMID:28650561
|
| PS3 | Met | In approved functional studies, this variant was listed as pathogenic in both MEK activation and ERK activation assays, consistent with abnormal downstream MAPK pathway activation. Under the BRAF RASopathy specification, results from 2 different approved assays meet PS3 at Moderate strength. |
cspec
vcep_svi_rasopathy_vcep_v2_approved_functional_studies
PMID:19206169
|
| PS4 | Not assessed | Affected-case enrichment meeting the RASopathy point threshold was not directly established from the reviewed evidence, so PS4 was not applied. |
cspec
PMID:19206169
PMID:28650561
clinvar
|
| PM1 | Met | Thr599 lies within the BRAF CR3 activation segment (amino acids 594-627), which the BRAF RASopathy specification defines as a critical and well-established functional region for PM1. |
cspec
|
| PM2 | Met | This variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and gnomAD v4.1. Under the BRAF RASopathy specification, absence from controls supports PM2 at Supporting strength. |
cspec
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| PM3 | N/A | PM3 is not applicable in this BRAF RASopathy framework. |
cspec
|
| PM4 | N/A | This is a missense variant and does not cause a protein length change, so PM4 does not apply. |
cspec
|
| PM5 | Not assessed | No directly reviewed codon-level evidence established a different pathogenic missense change at this same codon at the strength required by the BRAF RASopathy specification. |
cspec
|
| PM6 | Not assessed | No assumed or confirmed de novo point total for this variant was directly established from the reviewed evidence, so PM6 was not applied. |
cspec
PMID:19206169
PMID:28650561
|
| PP1 | Not assessed | No segregation data were identified showing this variant cosegregates with disease across the number of informative meioses required for PP1. |
cspec
|
| PP2 | Not assessed | The BRAF RASopathy specification uses a missense constraint threshold of z score greater than 3.09 for PP2, and that gene-level value was not directly available in the reviewed evidence. |
cspec
|
| PP3 | Not met | Computational evidence does not meet the BRAF RASopathy threshold for PP3. REVEL is 0.359, which is below the required threshold of 0.7, and SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact with a maximum delta score of 0.00. BayesDel is 0.308415, but this does not change the VCEP missense rule application. |
cspec
revel
spliceai
bayesdel
|
| PP4 | N/A | PP4 is not applicable in this BRAF RASopathy framework. |
cspec
|
| PP5 | Met | Expert panel ClinGen RASopathy Variant Curation Expert Panel classified as Pathogenic. |
cspec
clinvar
|
| BA1 | Not met | This variant does not meet BA1 because it is absent from gnomAD and therefore is below the BRAF RASopathy filtering allele frequency threshold of 0.05%. |
cspec
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| BS1 | Not met | This variant does not meet BS1 because it is absent from gnomAD and therefore is below the BRAF RASopathy filtering allele frequency threshold of 0.025%. |
cspec
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| BS2 | Not assessed | No evidence was identified showing this variant in unaffected individuals at the point threshold required for BS2. |
cspec
|
| BS3 | N/A | BS3 is not applicable in this BRAF RASopathy framework. |
cspec
|
| BS4 | Not assessed | No nonsegregation data were identified for this variant, so BS4 was not applied. |
cspec
|
| BP1 | N/A | This is a missense variant, whereas the BRAF RASopathy specification limits BP1 to truncating loss-of-function variant types in genes without an established loss-of-function disease mechanism. |
cspec
|
| BP2 | Not assessed | No phase or co-occurrence evidence meeting the RASopathy point-based BP2 thresholds was identified. |
cspec
|
| BP3 | N/A | BP3 is not applicable in this BRAF RASopathy framework. |
cspec
|
| BP4 | Not met | Computational evidence does not meet the BRAF RASopathy threshold for BP4. REVEL is 0.359, which is above the benign threshold of 0.3, although SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact with a maximum delta score of 0.00. BayesDel is 0.308415, but the VCEP missense rule is not met. |
cspec
revel
spliceai
bayesdel
|
| BP5 | Not assessed | No alternative molecular explanation data meeting the RASopathy point-based BP5 thresholds were identified. |
cspec
|
| BP6 | N/A | BP6 is not applicable in this BRAF RASopathy framework. |
cspec
|
| BP7 | N/A | This is not a synonymous, intronic, or non-coding variant, so BP7 does not apply. |
cspec
spliceai
|
Disclaimer:
The content and results provided by LYFE Sciences are for research and educational purposes only and must not be used as a substitute for professional medical judgment, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making any clinical decisions.