LYFE Sciences · Project HERA
Variant Interpretation · Classification Report
Variant classification summary
NM_007294.3:c.5561T>C
BRCA1
· NP_009225.1:p.(Leu1854Pro)
· NM_007294.3
GRCh37: chr17:41197726 A>G
·
GRCh38: chr17:43045709 A>G
Gene:
BRCA1
Transcript:
NM_007294.3
Final call
Likely Pathogenic
PS3_Strong
PP3_Supporting
PP5_Supporting
Variant details
Gene
BRCA1
Transcript
NM_007294.3
Protein
NP_009225.1:p.(Leu1854Pro)
gnomAD AF
ClinVar
OncoKB
Likely Oncogenic
Classification rationale
Interpretation summary
Generated evidence synthesis
1
The BRCA1 c.5561T>C (p.Leu1854Pro) variant has not been observed in COSMIC and has been reported in ClinVar, where the ClinGen ENIGMA expert panel classifies it as likely pathogenic.
2
This variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and gnomAD v4.1, supporting rarity in population databases.
3
In calibrated BRCA1 functional studies summarized by ENIGMA, this variant showed damaging loss-of-function behavior consistent with pathogenic control variants in two studies, supporting PS3_Strong.
4
This missense change lies in the BRCA1 BRCT repeat domain; BayesDel no-AF is 0.406711, which is above the ENIGMA PP3 threshold of 0.28, REVEL is 0.731, and SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact with a max delta score of 0.00, supporting a deleterious protein effect rather than a splicing effect.
Final determination:
One Strong pathogenic criterion together with two Supporting pathogenic criteria meets the ENIGMA Table 3 rule for Likely Pathogenic.
Criteria assessment
ACMG/AMP criteria review
Criteria shown when status is available
All criteria require review: For research and educational purposes only.
| Criterion | Status | Rationale | Evidence used |
|---|---|---|---|
| PVS1 | N/A | This is a missense variant, not a nonsense, frameshift, initiation-loss, or canonical ±1/2 splice variant, and SpliceAI predicts no splice effect (max delta score 0.00). Available evidence does not support applying PVS1 for this change. |
cspec
pvs1_gene_context
pvs1_variant_assessment
spliceai
|
| PS1 | Not met | No previously classified pathogenic variant producing the same amino acid substitution was identified, so PS1 is not met. |
cspec
|
| PS2 | N/A | This criterion is not applicable in the BRCA1 ENIGMA specification. |
cspec
|
| PS3 | Met | In calibrated BRCA1 functional studies summarized by the ENIGMA expert panel, c.5561T>C (p.Leu1854Pro) showed damaging loss-of-function behavior similar to pathogenic control variants in two studies, supporting PS3_Strong. |
vcep_specifications_table9_v1_2_2024_11_18
PMID:30209399
PMID:30765603
|
| PS4 | Not assessed | No case-control study or other quantitative evidence showing that this variant is significantly enriched in affected individuals versus controls was identified, so PS4 was not assessed. |
|
| PM1 | N/A | Although this variant lies in the BRCA1 BRCT region, PM1 is not applicable in the BRCA1 ENIGMA specification, which handles domain information through other criteria. |
cspec
vcep_specifications_v1_2_2024_11_18
vcep_appendices_v1_2_2024_11_18
|
| PM2 | Not assessed | This variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and gnomAD v4.1, which supports rarity. However, ENIGMA PM2_Supporting requires absence in the specified population datasets with adequate coverage, and the full rule elements needed for formal PM2 assignment were not identified here, so PM2 was not assessed. |
cspec
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| PM3 | Not assessed | No evidence was identified that this variant occurred with another BRCA1 pathogenic variant in a patient with a phenotype consistent with BRCA1-related Fanconi anemia, so PM3 was not assessed. |
cspec
|
| PM4 | N/A | This criterion is not applicable in the BRCA1 ENIGMA specification. |
cspec
|
| PM5 | N/A | In the BRCA1 ENIGMA specification, PM5 is used for protein-termination variants in exons with prior proven pathogenic protein-termination variants. This variant is missense, so PM5 is not applicable. |
cspec
vcep_specifications_table4_v1_2_2024_11_18
|
| PM6 | N/A | This criterion is not applicable in the BRCA1 ENIGMA specification. |
cspec
|
| PP1 | Not assessed | No quantitative segregation data were identified for this variant, so PP1 was not assessed. |
|
| PP2 | N/A | This criterion is not applicable in the BRCA1 ENIGMA specification. |
cspec
|
| PP3 | Met | This missense variant lies in the BRCA1 BRCT repeat domain, where ENIGMA allows PP3 for variants with predicted protein impact. BayesDel no-AF is 0.406711, which is above the ENIGMA PP3 threshold of 0.28, REVEL is 0.731, and SpliceAI shows no predicted splice effect (max delta score 0.00), supporting a deleterious protein effect and meeting PP3_Supporting. |
cspec
bayesdel
revel
spliceai
vcep_appendices_v1_2_2024_11_18
|
| PP4 | Not assessed | No calibrated BRCA1 clinical-history likelihood ratio meeting ENIGMA PP4 thresholds was identified for this exact variant, so PP4 was not assessed. |
cspec
vcep_pmid_31853058_brca1_clinical_history_lr
PMID:31853058
|
| PP5 | Met | Expert panel ClinGen ENIGMA BRCA1 and BRCA2 Variant Curation Expert Panel, ClinGen classified as Likely pathogenic. |
cspec
clinvar
|
| BA1 | Not met | This variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and gnomAD v4.1 and therefore is not above the ENIGMA BA1 threshold of filter allele frequency greater than 0.1%. BA1 is not met. |
cspec
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| BS1 | Not met | This variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and gnomAD v4.1 and therefore is not above the ENIGMA BS1 thresholds of filter allele frequency greater than 0.002% or greater than 0.01%. BS1 is not met. |
cspec
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| BS2 | Not assessed | No evidence was identified from unaffected individuals or from BRCA1-related recessive disease point scoring to support BS2, so this criterion was not assessed. |
cspec
|
| BS3 | Not met | Available calibrated functional evidence does not show retained normal BRCA1 function for this variant. Instead, ENIGMA Table 9 summarizes damaging loss-of-function results in two studies, so BS3 is not met. |
vcep_specifications_table9_v1_2_2024_11_18
PMID:30209399
PMID:30765603
|
| BS4 | Not assessed | No quantitative non-segregation data were identified for this variant, so BS4 was not assessed. |
|
| BP1 | Not met | This missense variant is located in the BRCA1 BRCT functional domain rather than outside a clinically important domain, so the ENIGMA BP1_Strong rule is not met. |
cspec
vcep_appendices_v1_2_2024_11_18
spliceai
|
| BP2 | N/A | This criterion is not applicable in the BRCA1 ENIGMA specification. |
cspec
|
| BP3 | N/A | This criterion is not applicable in the BRCA1 ENIGMA specification. |
cspec
|
| BP4 | Not met | ENIGMA BP4 for missense variants in a clinically important domain requires BayesDel no-AF at or below 0.15 and SpliceAI at or below 0.1. Although SpliceAI is 0.00, BayesDel is 0.406711, which is above the benign threshold and instead supports PP3, so BP4 is not met. |
cspec
bayesdel
spliceai
vcep_appendices_v1_2_2024_11_18
|
| BP5 | Not assessed | No calibrated BRCA1 clinical-history likelihood ratio meeting ENIGMA BP5 thresholds was identified for this exact variant, so BP5 was not assessed. |
cspec
vcep_pmid_31853058_brca1_clinical_history_lr
PMID:31853058
|
| BP6 | N/A | This criterion is not applicable in the BRCA1 ENIGMA specification. |
cspec
|
| BP7 | N/A | This is a missense variant in the BRCA1 BRCT functional domain, and no RNA study showing a normal transcript effect was identified. The ENIGMA BP7 rules are not met for this variant. |
cspec
spliceai
vcep_appendices_v1_2_2024_11_18
|
Disclaimer:
The content and results provided by LYFE Sciences are for research and educational purposes only and must not be used as a substitute for professional medical judgment, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making any clinical decisions.