LYFE Sciences · Project HERA
Variant Interpretation · Classification Report
Variant classification summary
NM_000059.3:c.9227G>T
BRCA2
· NP_000050.2:p.(Gly3076Val)
· NM_000059.3
GRCh37: chr13:32954253 G>T
·
GRCh38: chr13:32380116 G>T
Gene:
BRCA2
Transcript:
NM_000059.3
Final call
Likely Pathogenic
PS3_Strong
PP3_Supporting
PP5_Supporting
Variant details
Gene
BRCA2
Transcript
NM_000059.3
Protein
NP_000050.2:p.(Gly3076Val)
gnomAD AF
ClinVar
OncoKB
Likely Oncogenic
Classification rationale
Interpretation summary
Generated evidence synthesis
1
The BRCA2 c.9227G>T (p.Gly3076Val) variant has not been observed in COSMIC and has been reported in ClinVar, including a Pathogenic expert-panel classification from ClinGen ENIGMA.
2
This variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and gnomAD v4.1, which supports rarity, although the site-level depth information required for formal ENIGMA PM2_Supporting application was not identified here.
3
In the ENIGMA BRCA2 calibrated functional dataset, p.(Gly3076Val) showed abnormal function similar to pathogenic control variants, supporting PS3 at strong strength.
4
This missense change lies within the BRCA2 DNA-binding domain; BayesDel no-AF is 0.377938, REVEL is 0.884, and SpliceAI max delta is 0.07, supporting a damaging protein effect without a predicted splice effect and therefore supporting PP3 but not BP4.
Final determination:
Under ENIGMA BRCA1/2 Table 3, one Strong pathogenic criterion together with two Supporting pathogenic criteria supports a Likely Pathogenic classification.
Criteria assessment
ACMG/AMP criteria review
Criteria shown when status is available
All criteria require review: For research and educational purposes only.
| Criterion | Status | Rationale | Evidence used |
|---|---|---|---|
| PVS1 | Not met | This variant is a missense substitution, not a nonsense, frameshift, initiation-loss, or canonical ±1,2 splice variant. SpliceAI predicts no significant splice effect (max delta 0.07), so available evidence does not support a BRCA2 loss-of-function mechanism for PVS1. |
pvs1_gene_context
pvs1_variant_assessment
cspec
spliceai
vcep_specifications_v1_2_2024_11_18
|
| PS1 | Not assessed | No previously classified variant with the same proven amino-acid change or the same demonstrated splice effect was identified here, so PS1 could not be assessed from the available evidence. |
cspec
vcep_specifications_v1_2_2024_11_18
|
| PS2 | N/A | De novo occurrence is not an applicable criterion in this BRCA2 ENIGMA framework for this review. |
cspec
|
| PS3 | Met | In the ENIGMA BRCA2 calibrated functional dataset, c.9227G>T (p.Gly3076Val) showed abnormal function similar to pathogenic control variants, supporting PS3 at strong strength. |
vcep_specifications_table9_v1_2_2024_11_18
vcep_specifications_v1_2_2024_11_18
|
| PS4 | Not assessed | This variant has been reported in ClinVar, but no case-control study, odds ratio, or other quantitative prevalence evidence meeting the ENIGMA PS4 rule was identified here. |
clinvar
vcep_supplementarytables_v1_2_2024_11_18
vcep_humu_40_1557_s001
vcep_specifications_v1_2_2024_11_18
|
| PM1 | N/A | PM1 is not an applicable criterion in this BRCA2 ENIGMA framework for this review. |
cspec
|
| PM2 | Not assessed | This variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and gnomAD v4.1, which supports rarity. However, the ENIGMA PM2_Supporting rule also requires adequate local read depth, and site-level depth information was not identified here. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
vcep_specifications_v1_2_2024_11_18
|
| PM3 | Not assessed | No evidence was identified that this variant was observed in trans with another BRCA2 variant in an individual with a phenotype consistent with BRCA2-related Fanconi anemia, so PM3 could not be assessed. |
cspec
vcep_specifications_v1_2_2024_11_18
|
| PM4 | N/A | PM4 is not an applicable criterion in this BRCA2 ENIGMA framework for this review. |
cspec
|
| PM5 | N/A | In this BRCA2 ENIGMA framework, PM5 is defined for protein-truncating variants already annotated with PVS1. This variant is a missense substitution, so that PM5 rule does not apply. |
cspec
vcep_specifications_table4_v1_2_2024_11_18
vcep_specifications_v1_2_2024_11_18
|
| PM6 | N/A | PM6 is not an applicable criterion in this BRCA2 ENIGMA framework for this review. |
cspec
|
| PP1 | Not assessed | No segregation data were identified for this variant, so PP1 could not be assessed. |
cspec
vcep_specifications_v1_2_2024_11_18
|
| PP2 | N/A | PP2 is not an applicable criterion in this BRCA2 ENIGMA framework for this review. |
cspec
|
| PP3 | Met | This missense variant lies within the BRCA2 DNA-binding domain (amino acids 2481-3186). BayesDel no-AF is 0.377938, which is above the ENIGMA PP3 threshold of 0.30, REVEL is 0.884, and SpliceAI predicts no significant splice effect (max delta 0.07), supporting a damaging protein effect consistent with PP3. |
cspec
bayesdel
revel
spliceai
vcep_appendices_v1_2_2024_11_18
vcep_specifications_v1_2_2024_11_18
|
| PP4 | Not met | The BRCA2 clinical-history likelihood ratio for c.9227G>T is 0.776 with 1 proband, which is below the ENIGMA PP4 supporting threshold of 2.08. This value does not support PP4. |
vcep_pmid_31853058_brca2_clinical_history_lr
PMID:31853058
vcep_specifications_v1_2_2024_11_18
|
| PP5 | Met | Expert panel ClinGen ENIGMA BRCA1 and BRCA2 Variant Curation Expert Panel, ClinGen classified as Pathogenic. |
cspec
clinvar
|
| BA1 | Not met | This variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and gnomAD v4.1 and therefore is not above the ENIGMA BA1 threshold of filter allele frequency greater than 0.1%. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
vcep_specifications_v1_2_2024_11_18
|
| BS1 | Not met | This variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and gnomAD v4.1 and therefore is not above the ENIGMA BS1 thresholds of filter allele frequency greater than 0.002% or 0.01%. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
vcep_specifications_v1_2_2024_11_18
|
| BS2 | Not assessed | No qualifying observations in individuals without features of BRCA2-related Fanconi anemia were identified for the ENIGMA BS2 point-based rule, so BS2 could not be assessed. |
cspec
vcep_specifications_v1_2_2024_11_18
|
| BS3 | Not met | Available calibrated functional evidence showed an abnormal damaging effect rather than normal function, so BS3 is not supported for this variant. |
vcep_specifications_table9_v1_2_2024_11_18
vcep_specifications_v1_2_2024_11_18
|
| BS4 | Not assessed | No non-segregation data with a quantitative likelihood ratio were identified for this variant, so BS4 could not be assessed. |
cspec
vcep_supplementarytables_v1_2_2024_11_18
vcep_humu_40_1557_s001
vcep_specifications_v1_2_2024_11_18
|
| BP1 | Not met | This missense variant lies within the BRCA2 DNA-binding domain (amino acids 2481-3186), so it does not meet the ENIGMA BP1 rule, which is limited to missense or silent changes outside clinically important functional domains with no predicted splice effect. |
cspec
spliceai
vcep_appendices_v1_2_2024_11_18
vcep_specifications_v1_2_2024_11_18
|
| BP2 | N/A | BP2 is not an applicable criterion in this BRCA2 ENIGMA framework for this review. |
cspec
|
| BP3 | N/A | BP3 is not an applicable criterion in this BRCA2 ENIGMA framework for this review. |
cspec
|
| BP4 | Not met | Although SpliceAI predicts no significant splice effect (max delta 0.07, below the BP4 threshold of 0.1), BayesDel no-AF is 0.377938, which is above the benign BP4 threshold of 0.18. Available computational evidence therefore does not support BP4. |
cspec
bayesdel
spliceai
vcep_appendices_v1_2_2024_11_18
vcep_specifications_v1_2_2024_11_18
|
| BP5 | Not met | The BRCA2 clinical-history likelihood ratio for c.9227G>T is 0.776 with 1 proband, which is above the ENIGMA BP5 supporting threshold of 0.48. This value does not support BP5. |
vcep_pmid_31853058_brca2_clinical_history_lr
PMID:31853058
vcep_specifications_v1_2_2024_11_18
|
| BP6 | N/A | BP6 is not an applicable criterion in this BRCA2 ENIGMA framework for this review. |
cspec
|
| BP7 | Not met | This is a missense variant within a clinically important BRCA2 functional domain, and no RNA evidence showing a benign transcript effect was identified. Available evidence therefore does not support BP7. |
cspec
spliceai
vcep_specifications_v1_2_2024_11_18
|
Disclaimer:
The content and results provided by LYFE Sciences are for research and educational purposes only and must not be used as a substitute for professional medical judgment, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making any clinical decisions.