LYFE Sciences · Project HERA
Variant Interpretation · Classification Report
Variant classification summary
NM_002524.4:c.71T>A
NRAS
· NP_002515.1:p.(Ile24Asn)
· NM_002524.4
GRCh37: chr1:115258711 A>T
·
GRCh38: chr1:114716090 A>T
Gene:
NRAS
Transcript:
NM_002524.4
Final call
Likely Pathogenic
PS3 supporting
PS4 moderate
PM2 supporting
PM6 strong
PP3 supporting
PP5 supporting
Variant details
Gene
NRAS
Transcript
NM_002524.4
Protein
NP_002515.1:p.(Ile24Asn)
gnomAD AF
ClinVar
OncoKB
Likely Oncogenic
Classification rationale
Interpretation summary
Generated evidence synthesis
1
The NRAS c.71T>A (p.Ile24Asn) variant has been reported in ClinVar and is classified as Likely Pathogenic by the ClinGen RASopathy expert panel.
2
This variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and gnomAD v4.1, supporting rarity under the NRAS RASopathy framework.
3
In expert-panel-reviewed functional evidence, RAS activation assays showed mildly increased GTP-bound RAS with enhanced MAPK phosphorylation, and a zebrafish model showed developmental and craniofacial defects that were rescued by MEK inhibition, supporting an abnormal gain-of-function effect.
4
Computational evidence supports a damaging missense effect, with REVEL 0.863 above the PP3 threshold of 0.7, SpliceAI showing no significant splice impact with a maximum delta score of 0.00, and BayesDel 0.159947.
Final determination:
Rule11 in the ClinGen RASopathy Expert Panel Specifications to the ACMG/AMP Variant Interpretation Guidelines for NRAS Version 2.3.0 v2.3.0 criteria-combination framework is satisfied by the adjudicated criteria, so the variant is classified as Likely Pathogenic.
Criteria assessment
ACMG/AMP criteria review
Criteria shown when status is available
All criteria require review: For research and educational purposes only.
| Criterion | Status | Rationale | Evidence used |
|---|---|---|---|
| PVS1 | N/A | This is a missense substitution, and the NRAS RASopathy specification marks PVS1 as not applicable for this gene-disease framework. The generic PVS1 scaffold also indicates that this variant is not a null variant eligible for PVS1 assessment. |
cspec
pvs1_gene_context
pvs1_variant_assessment
|
| PS1 | Not assessed | No reviewed evidence was identified showing the same amino acid change established as pathogenic from a different nucleotide change in the permitted NRAS RASopathy framework. |
cspec
|
| PS2 | Not met | Available evidence describes de novo occurrences with unconfirmed parental relationships, so confirmed maternity and paternity were not established for PS2. |
clinvar
cspec
|
| PS3 | Met | In expert-panel-reviewed functional evidence, RAS activation assays in 293T cells showed mildly increased GTP-bound RAS with enhanced MAPK phosphorylation, and a zebrafish model showed developmental and craniofacial defects that were rescued by MEK inhibition. This supports an abnormal gain-of-function effect consistent with the NRAS RASopathy mechanism. |
clinvar
vcep_svi_rasopathy_vcep_v2_approved_functional_studies
cspec
|
| PS4 | Met | This variant has been reported in 4 probands with features of RASopathy in expert-panel-reviewed evidence, which the NRAS RASopathy expert panel used to apply PS4 at Moderate strength. |
clinvar
cspec
|
| PM1 | Not met | Residue 24 is outside the NRAS RASopathy PM1 domains defined for this specification: P-loop amino acids 10-17 and Switch I amino acids 25-40, as well as SW2 amino acids 57-64 and SAK amino acids 145-156. Therefore this missense change does not meet the domain-based PM1 rule. |
cspec
|
| PM2 | Met | This variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and gnomAD v4.1, meeting the NRAS RASopathy requirement for PM2 at Supporting strength. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
cspec
|
| PM3 | N/A | PM3 is not applicable in this NRAS RASopathy framework because the relevant disease context is not recessive. |
cspec
|
| PM4 | N/A | PM4 is intended for in-frame insertions or deletions and stop-loss variants causing protein length change. This variant is a missense substitution and does not change protein length. |
cspec
|
| PM5 | Not assessed | No reviewed evidence was identified confirming a different pathogenic or likely pathogenic amino acid substitution at this same codon within the permitted RASopathy framework, so PM5 was not applied from the currently reviewed sources. |
cspec
|
| PM6 | Met | Expert-panel-reviewed evidence reports this variant as de novo in 2 individuals with features of RASopathy, but with unconfirmed parental relationships. Under the NRAS RASopathy point-based framework, this was used to apply PM6 at Strong strength. |
clinvar
cspec
|
| PP1 | Not assessed | No segregation data were identified to show that this variant co-segregates with RASopathy across informative meioses. |
cspec
|
| PP2 | N/A | PP2 is not applicable in the NRAS RASopathy specification. |
cspec
|
| PP3 | Met | For this missense variant, the REVEL score is 0.863, which is above the NRAS RASopathy PP3 threshold of 0.7. SpliceAI predicts no splice effect with a maximum delta score of 0.00, supporting interpretation as a missense effect rather than a splicing mechanism. BayesDel is 0.159947 and does not contradict a damaging missense interpretation. |
revel
spliceai
bayesdel
cspec
|
| PP4 | N/A | PP4 is not applicable in this NRAS RASopathy framework because phenotype-specific evidence is handled through other criteria such as PS4. |
cspec
|
| PP5 | Met | Expert panel ClinGen RASopathy Variant Curation Expert Panel classified as Likely pathogenic. |
cspec
clinvar
|
| BA1 | Not met | This variant is absent from gnomAD, which is below the BA1 threshold of at least 0.05% filtering allele frequency. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
cspec
|
| BS1 | Not met | This variant is absent from gnomAD, which is below the BS1 threshold of at least 0.025% filtering allele frequency. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
cspec
|
| BS2 | Not assessed | No evidence was identified showing this variant in unaffected individuals at a level sufficient for BS2 under the NRAS RASopathy point-based framework. |
cspec
|
| BS3 | N/A | BS3 is not applicable in this NRAS RASopathy specification. |
cspec
|
| BS4 | Not assessed | No non-segregation data were identified to show that this variant fails to track with disease in informative relatives. |
cspec
|
| BP1 | N/A | BP1 in this framework is reserved for truncating loss-of-function variants in a gain-of-function RASopathy gene without an established loss-of-function disease correlation. This variant is a missense substitution, so BP1 does not apply. |
cspec
|
| BP2 | Not assessed | No evidence was identified showing this variant in cis or trans with an alternative pathogenic molecular explanation sufficient for BP2 point assignment. |
cspec
|
| BP3 | N/A | BP3 is not applicable in this NRAS RASopathy specification. |
cspec
|
| BP4 | Not met | BP4 is not met because the REVEL score is 0.863, which is above the benign-supporting threshold of 0.3 or lower for missense variants. Although SpliceAI predicts no splice impact with a maximum delta score of 0.00, the missense predictor result does not support a benign interpretation. |
revel
spliceai
bayesdel
cspec
|
| BP5 | Not assessed | No evidence was identified showing an alternative molecular explanation in a different gene or a phenotype fully explained by another cause sufficient for BP5 point assignment. |
cspec
|
| BP6 | N/A | BP6 is not used in this VCEP framework. |
cspec
|
| BP7 | N/A | BP7 applies to synonymous or certain non-coding variants with no predicted splice impact. This variant is missense, so BP7 does not apply. |
cspec
spliceai
|
Disclaimer:
The content and results provided by LYFE Sciences are for research and educational purposes only and must not be used as a substitute for professional medical judgment, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making any clinical decisions.