LYFE Sciences · Project HERA
Variant Interpretation · Classification Report
Variant classification summary
NM_000059.3:c.8168A>C
BRCA2
· NP_000050.2:p.(Asp2723Ala)
· NM_000059.3
GRCh37: chr13:32937507 A>C
·
GRCh38: chr13:32363370 A>C
Gene:
BRCA2
Transcript:
NM_000059.3
Final call
Likely Pathogenic
Variant details
Gene
BRCA2
Transcript
NM_000059.3
Protein
NP_000050.2:p.(Asp2723Ala)
gnomAD AF
ClinVar
OncoKB
Likely Oncogenic
Classification rationale
Interpretation summary
Generated evidence synthesis
1
The BRCA2 c.8168A>C (p.Asp2723Ala, p.D2723A) variant has been reported in ClinVar and is classified as Pathogenic by the ClinGen ENIGMA BRCA1 and BRCA2 Variant Curation Expert Panel.
2
This variant is present at very low frequency in population databases, with 1/251098 alleles in gnomAD v2.1 (AF 3.98e-06) and 6/1614162 alleles in gnomAD v4.1 (AF 3.72e-06), which is too low to support a benign frequency criterion but means PM2 is not met because the variant is not absent from controls.
3
In the ENIGMA BRCA2 curated functional dataset, calibrated functional studies support PS3 Strong for this variant, indicating a damaging effect on BRCA2 function.
4
Computational evidence supports a damaging protein effect because the variant is in the BRCA2 DNA-binding region, BayesDel is 0.575545 above the PP3 threshold of 0.30, REVEL is 0.94, and SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact (max delta score 0.00).
Final determination:
One Strong pathogenic criterion together with two Supporting pathogenic criteria meets the ENIGMA Table 3 rule for a Likely Pathogenic classification.
Criteria assessment
ACMG/AMP criteria review
Criteria shown when status is available
All criteria require review: For research and educational purposes only.
| Criterion | Status | Rationale | Evidence used |
|---|---|---|---|
| PVS1 | Not met | This missense variant does not fall into the BRCA2 loss-of-function categories used for PVS1, and SpliceAI predicts no significant splice effect (max delta score 0.00), so available evidence does not support a truncating or RNA loss-of-function mechanism for this change. |
cspec
pvs1_gene_context
pvs1_variant_assessment
spliceai
|
| PS1 | Not assessed | No qualifying reference variant with the same amino acid change and an established BRCA2 protein-based pathogenic classification was identified in the reviewed materials, so PS1 was not applied. |
cspec
vcep_specifications_v1_2_2024_11_18
clinvar
|
| PS2 | N/A | This VCEP framework does not use PS2 for BRCA2. |
cspec
|
| PS3 | Met | In the ENIGMA BRCA2 curated functional dataset, this variant is assigned PS3 Strong because calibrated functional studies showed protein function similar to pathogenic control variants, supporting a damaging effect on BRCA2 function. |
vcep_specifications_table9_v1_2_2024_11_18
vcep_specifications_v1_2_2024_11_18
|
| PS4 | Not met | No case-control evidence showing a statistically increased prevalence of this variant in affected individuals versus controls was identified, and the reviewed ENIGMA posterior-probability and multifactorial resources did not provide an exact variant-specific PS4-qualifying result. |
cspec
vcep_supplementarytables_v1_2_2024_11_18
vcep_humu_40_1557_s001
|
| PM1 | N/A | PM1 is not used as a standalone criterion in the BRCA2 specification because domain information is incorporated into the bioinformatic framework for PP3, BP4, and BP1. |
cspec
vcep_specifications_v1_2_2024_11_18
|
| PM2 | Not met | ENIGMA PM2_Supporting requires absence from gnomAD, but this variant is present in gnomAD v2.1 at 1/251098 alleles (AF 3.98e-06) and in gnomAD v4.1 at 6/1614162 alleles (AF 3.72e-06), so PM2 is not met. |
cspec
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| PM3 | Not assessed | No evidence was identified that this variant was observed in trans with another BRCA2 pathogenic variant in an individual with BRCA2-related Fanconi anemia, so PM3 could not be assessed. |
cspec
vcep_specifications_v1_2_2024_11_18
|
| PM4 | N/A | PM4 is not used in this BRCA2 specification. |
cspec
|
| PM5 | N/A | In this BRCA2 framework, PM5 is used for protein-termination variants in eligible exons, not for this missense substitution. |
cspec
vcep_specifications_table4_v1_2_2024_11_18
|
| PM6 | N/A | This VCEP framework does not use PM6 for BRCA2. |
cspec
|
| PP1 | Not assessed | No quantitative co-segregation data were identified for this variant, so PP1 could not be applied. |
cspec
vcep_humu_40_1557_s001
vcep_supplementarytables_v1_2_2024_11_18
|
| PP2 | N/A | This VCEP framework does not use PP2 for BRCA2. |
cspec
|
| PP3 | Met | This missense variant lies within the BRCA2 DNA-binding functional region used by ENIGMA (amino acids 2481-3186) and has a BayesDel score of 0.575545, which is above the PP3 threshold of 0.30. REVEL is also high at 0.94, supporting a deleterious protein effect. SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact (max delta score 0.00), so the computational evidence supports a damaging protein consequence rather than a splice mechanism. |
cspec
bayesdel
revel
spliceai
vcep_specifications_v1_2_2024_11_18
|
| PP4 | Not met | The BRCA2 clinical-history likelihood ratio for this variant is 1.329 with 2 probands, which falls in the ENIGMA neutral zone above 0.48 and below 2.08, so available clinical-history evidence does not support PP4. |
PMID:31853058
vcep_pmid_31853058_brca2_clinical_history_lr
vcep_pmid_31853058_li_2020_geneticsinmedicine
cspec
|
| PP5 | Met | Expert panel ClinGen ENIGMA BRCA1 and BRCA2 Variant Curation Expert Panel, ClinGen classified as Pathogenic. |
cspec
clinvar
|
| BA1 | Not met | This variant is far below the BA1 threshold. In gnomAD v4.1 the highest available filter allele frequency is 1.83e-06, which is well below the ENIGMA BA1 cutoff of 0.001, so BA1 is not met. |
cspec
gnomad_v4
gnomad_v2
|
| BS1 | Not met | This variant does not meet the BRCA2 BS1 frequency thresholds. The highest available filter allele frequency is 1.83e-06 in gnomAD v4.1, which is below the BS1_Supporting threshold of 0.00002 and below the BS1 threshold of 0.0001. |
cspec
gnomad_v4
gnomad_v2
|
| BS2 | Not assessed | No qualifying adult observations or point-based evidence against BRCA2-related Fanconi anemia were identified for this variant, so BS2 could not be assessed. |
cspec
vcep_specifications_v1_2_2024_11_18
|
| BS3 | Not met | Available functional evidence does not support normal BRCA2 function. Instead, the curated ENIGMA functional dataset assigns PS3 Strong for this variant, so BS3 is not met. |
vcep_specifications_table9_v1_2_2024_11_18
vcep_specifications_v1_2_2024_11_18
|
| BS4 | Not assessed | No quantitative lack-of-segregation evidence was identified for this variant, so BS4 could not be applied. |
cspec
vcep_humu_40_1557_s001
vcep_supplementarytables_v1_2_2024_11_18
|
| BP1 | Not met | This missense variant is located within the BRCA2 DNA-binding functional region rather than outside a clinically important domain, so BP1 is not met. |
cspec
vcep_specifications_v1_2_2024_11_18
|
| BP2 | N/A | This VCEP framework does not use BP2 for BRCA2. |
cspec
|
| BP3 | N/A | BP3 is not used in this BRCA2 specification. |
cspec
|
| BP4 | Not met | Although SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact (max delta score 0.00), the variant is in the BRCA2 DNA-binding region and the BayesDel score is 0.575545, which is above the BP4 benign threshold of 0.18. REVEL is also high at 0.94. Therefore, computational evidence does not support BP4. |
cspec
bayesdel
revel
spliceai
vcep_specifications_v1_2_2024_11_18
|
| BP5 | Not met | The BRCA2 clinical-history likelihood ratio for this variant is 1.329 with 2 probands, which is above the BP5 supporting cutoff of 0.48 and remains in the ENIGMA neutral zone, so BP5 is not met. |
PMID:31853058
vcep_pmid_31853058_brca2_clinical_history_lr
vcep_pmid_31853058_li_2020_geneticsinmedicine
cspec
|
| BP6 | N/A | This VCEP framework does not use BP6 for BRCA2. |
cspec
|
| BP7 | Not met | This is a missense variant within the BRCA2 DNA-binding functional region, and available functional evidence supports a damaging protein effect rather than a benign RNA-only effect, so BP7 is not met. |
cspec
vcep_specifications_table9_v1_2_2024_11_18
spliceai
|
Disclaimer:
The content and results provided by LYFE Sciences are for research and educational purposes only and must not be used as a substitute for professional medical judgment, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making any clinical decisions.