LYFE Sciences · Project HERA
Variant Interpretation · Classification Report
Variant classification summary
NM_001354609.1:c.483G>C
BRAF
· NP_001341538.1:p.(Leu161=)
· NM_001354609.1
GRCh37: chr7:140534430 C>G
·
GRCh38: chr7:140834630 C>G
Gene:
BRAF
Transcript:
NM_001354609.1
Final call
Likely Benign
BS1 strong
BP4 supporting
BP6 supporting benign
Variant details
Gene
BRAF
Transcript
NM_001354609.1
Protein
NP_001341538.1:p.(Leu161=)
gnomAD AF
ClinVar
OncoKB
Unknown Oncogenic Effect
Classification rationale
Interpretation summary
Generated evidence synthesis
1
The BRAF c.483G>C (p.Leu161=) variant has not been identified as a statistically significant hotspot in Cancer Hotspots and has been reported in ClinVar as benign/likely benign, including a likely benign expert-panel classification.
2
This variant is present in gnomAD, with grpmax filtering allele frequency 0.03792% in v2.1 and 0.04133% in v4.1, which is above the BRAF VCEP BS1 threshold of 0.025% but below the BA1 threshold of 0.05%.
3
In silico splice prediction does not support a deleterious effect, with SpliceAI showing a maximum delta score of 0.02 for this synonymous change.
Final determination:
Rule18 in the ClinGen RASopathy Expert Panel Specifications to the ACMG/AMP Variant Interpretation Guidelines for BRAF Version 2.3.0 v2.3.0 criteria-combination framework is satisfied by the adjudicated criteria, so the variant is classified as Likely Benign.
Criteria assessment
ACMG/AMP criteria review
Criteria shown when status is available
All criteria require review: For research and educational purposes only.
| Criterion | Status | Rationale | Evidence used |
|---|---|---|---|
| PVS1 | N/A | This variant is a synonymous substitution, and the BRAF RASopathy VCEP does not apply PVS1 to this variant type. The generic PVS1 scaffold also indicates that this variant is not a nonsense, frameshift, or canonical +/-1,2 splice-site variant. |
cspec
pvs1_gene_context
pvs1_variant_assessment
|
| PS1 | N/A | This variant does not change the encoded amino acid and therefore does not meet the PS1 requirement for the same pathogenic amino acid change as a previously established pathogenic variant. |
cspec
|
| PS2 | Not assessed | No confirmed de novo occurrence with maternity and paternity established was identified for this variant. |
cspec
|
| PS3 | Not assessed | No approved functional study for this specific variant was identified to show a damaging effect on protein function or splicing. |
cspec
vcep_svi_rasopathy_vcep_v2_approved_functional_studies
|
| PS4 | Not assessed | No affected-proband series or case-control enrichment data were identified for this variant. |
cspec
clinvar
|
| PM1 | Not met | This variant is in exon 3 at p.Leu161=, which is outside the BRAF VCEP-listed PM1 regions (exon 6, exon 11, P-loop amino acids 459-474, and CR3 activation segment amino acids 594-627). Cancer Hotspots also did not identify this site as a statistically significant hotspot. |
cspec
hotspots
|
| PM2 | Not met | This variant is present in population databases and therefore is not absent from controls. In gnomAD v2.1 the total allele frequency is 0.00566% with grpmax FAF 0.03792%, and in gnomAD v4.1 the total allele frequency is 0.00297% with grpmax FAF 0.04133%. |
cspec
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| PM3 | N/A | PM3 is not applicable in this BRAF RASopathy framework. |
cspec
|
| PM4 | N/A | This variant is a single-nucleotide synonymous substitution and does not cause an in-frame protein length change or stop-loss event. |
cspec
|
| PM5 | N/A | This variant does not alter the amino acid sequence, so the PM5 missense-at-same-codon rule does not apply. |
cspec
|
| PM6 | Not assessed | No presumed de novo occurrence with incomplete parental confirmation was identified for this variant. |
cspec
|
| PP1 | Not assessed | No segregation data were identified for this variant. |
cspec
|
| PP2 | N/A | PP2 is a missense criterion, and this variant is synonymous. |
cspec
|
| PP3 | Not met | Available computational evidence does not support a deleterious splicing effect. SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact with a maximum delta score of 0.02, which is below a level that would support PP3. |
cspec
spliceai
|
| PP4 | N/A | PP4 is not applicable in this BRAF RASopathy framework. |
cspec
|
| PP5 | N/A | PP5 is not used in this VCEP framework. |
cspec
|
| BA1 | Not met | The BRAF VCEP BA1 threshold is gnomAD filtering allele frequency >=0.05%. This variant has grpmax FAF 0.03792% in gnomAD v2.1 and 0.04133% in gnomAD v4.1, both below the BA1 threshold. |
cspec
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| BS1 | Met | The BRAF VCEP BS1 threshold is gnomAD filtering allele frequency >=0.025%. This variant exceeds that threshold in both population datasets, with grpmax FAF 0.03792% in gnomAD v2.1 and 0.04133% in gnomAD v4.1. |
cspec
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| BS2 | Not assessed | No data were identified showing this variant in well-phenotyped unaffected individuals sufficient for BS2 scoring. |
cspec
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| BS3 | N/A | BS3 is not applicable in this BRAF RASopathy framework. |
cspec
|
| BS4 | Not assessed | No nonsegregation data were identified for this variant. |
cspec
|
| BP1 | N/A | BP1 in this framework applies to truncating loss-of-function variants in a gain-of-function disease setting, and this variant is not a truncating variant. |
cspec
|
| BP2 | Not assessed | No evidence was identified that this variant occurs with an alternative molecular explanation in cis or trans sufficient for BP2 scoring. |
cspec
|
| BP3 | N/A | BP3 is not applicable in this BRAF RASopathy framework. |
cspec
|
| BP4 | Met | Available computational evidence supports no functional impact on splicing. SpliceAI predicts no significant splice effect for this synonymous variant, with a maximum delta score of 0.02. |
cspec
spliceai
|
| BP5 | Not assessed | No evidence was identified for an alternative molecular cause of disease sufficient for BP5 scoring. |
cspec
|
| BP6 | Met | Expert panel ClinGen RASopathy Variant Curation Expert Panel classified as Likely benign. |
cspec
clinvar
|
| BP7 | Not assessed | This is a synonymous variant and SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact with a maximum delta score of 0.02, but no nucleotide conservation evidence was identified to satisfy the full BP7 rule. |
cspec
spliceai
|
Disclaimer:
The content and results provided by LYFE Sciences are for research and educational purposes only and must not be used as a substitute for professional medical judgment, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making any clinical decisions.