LYFE Sciences · Project HERA
Variant Interpretation · Classification Report
Variant classification summary
NM_022552.4:c.856-59_1014+13dup
DNMT3A
· NP_072046.2:p.?
· NM_022552.4
GRCh37: chr2:25470446 A>ACCCCACAACTTACCACTGAGAATTTGCCGTCTCCGAACCACATGACCCAGCGGGTGCCTTCAGCTGCTCGGCTCCGGCCCGTCATCCACCAAGACACAATGCGGCCTGGCCACCAGGAGAAGCCCCGCAGTTTCCCCCACACCAGCTCCCCAATGCCAAAGCCCCGGCCGTCCTGGAGCCCCAAGGAGCAGAAATCATTACACAGTGGTCACGAGGCCCTGCCACCCTGAT
·
GRCh38: chr2:25247577 A>ACCCCACAACTTACCACTGAGAATTTGCCGTCTCCGAACCACATGACCCAGCGGGTGCCTTCAGCTGCTCGGCTCCGGCCCGTCATCCACCAAGACACAATGCGGCCTGGCCACCAGGAGAAGCCCCGCAGTTTCCCCCACACCAGCTCCCCAATGCCAAAGCCCCGGCCGTCCTGGAGCCCCAAGGAGCAGAAATCATTACACAGTGGTCACGAGGCCCTGCCACCCTGAT
Gene:
DNMT3A
Transcript:
NM_022552.4
Final call
VUS
PM2 supporting
PP3 supporting
Variant details
Gene
DNMT3A
Transcript
NM_022552.4
Protein
NP_072046.2:p.?
gnomAD AF
ClinVar
OncoKB
Classification rationale
Interpretation summary
Generated evidence synthesis
1
The DNMT3A c.856-59_1014+13dup (p.?) variant has not been observed in somatic cancers in COSMIC and has not been reported in ClinVar.
2
This variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and gnomAD v4.1, so its population frequency is below the non-VCEP PM2 threshold of 0.1%.
3
SpliceAI predicts a strong splice effect with a maximum delta score of 0.91, supporting possible abnormal splicing, although the exact transcript consequence of this intragenic duplication remains uncertain.
Final determination:
Generic ACMG/AMP 2015 fallback rules do not meet benign, likely benign, likely pathogenic, or pathogenic combination thresholds, so the variant is classified as Variant of Uncertain Significance.
Criteria assessment
ACMG/AMP criteria review
Criteria shown when status is available
All criteria require review: For research and educational purposes only.
| Criterion | Status | Rationale | Evidence used |
|---|---|---|---|
| PVS1 | Not met | Loss of function is an established DNMT3A disease mechanism, but this duplication does not fall into the default generic PVS1 null-variant categories of nonsense, frameshift, or canonical +/-1,2 splice variants. The exact transcript consequence remains uncertain for this intragenic duplication, so PVS1 is not applied. |
pvs1_gene_context
pvs1_variant_assessment
pvs1_generic_framework
|
| PS1 | N/A | PS1 applies to a variant that results in the same amino acid change as an established pathogenic variant. This duplication has an uncertain protein consequence (p.?), so PS1 is not applicable. |
|
| PS2 | Not assessed | No confirmed de novo occurrence with verified maternity and paternity was identified for this variant, so PS2 cannot be assessed from the available evidence. |
|
| PS3 | Not assessed | No well-established functional study was identified for this variant. In particular, no RNA study or other assay was found to show whether this duplication causes abnormal splicing or another damaging effect. |
|
| PS4 | Not assessed | No evidence was identified showing that this exact variant is enriched in affected individuals compared with controls, so PS4 is not met. |
clinvar
|
| PM1 | Not assessed | No evidence was identified that this duplication affects a well-established critical functional domain or mutational hot spot without benign variation. |
|
| PM2 | Met | This variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and gnomAD v4.1, so the observed population frequency is below the non-VCEP PM2 threshold of 0.1%, supporting rarity. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| PM3 | N/A | PM3 is used for recessive disorders with detected variants in trans. The available evidence does not support use of a recessive in-trans framework for this variant. |
|
| PM4 | Not assessed | This intragenic duplication spans intronic sequence on both sides of a coding segment, and the actual transcript and protein consequences remain uncertain. Because it is not established that the mature transcript contains a simple in-frame protein length change, PM4 is not applied. |
pvs1_variant_assessment
spliceai
|
| PM5 | N/A | PM5 applies to a novel missense change at an amino acid residue where a different pathogenic missense change has been established. This duplication does not have a defined missense consequence, so PM5 is not applicable. |
|
| PM6 | Not assessed | No report was identified showing this variant to be apparently de novo without confirmed parentage, so PM6 cannot be assessed. |
|
| PP1 | Not assessed | No segregation data were identified for this variant, so PP1 cannot be assessed. |
|
| PP2 | N/A | PP2 is a missense-specific criterion. This duplication does not have an established missense consequence, so PP2 is not applicable. |
|
| PP3 | Met | SpliceAI predicts a strong splice effect for this variant, with a maximum delta score of 0.91, which is above commonly used concern thresholds and supports an abnormal splicing effect. REVEL and BayesDel were not available because this is not an SNV. |
spliceai
|
| PP4 | Not assessed | No phenotype or family history information was provided to determine whether the clinical presentation is highly specific for a DNMT3A-related disorder, so PP4 cannot be assessed. |
|
| PP5 | Not assessed | No reputable source classification for this exact variant was identified. This variant is absent from ClinVar, so PP5 is not met. |
clinvar
|
| BA1 | Not met | This variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and gnomAD v4.1 and therefore does not meet the stand-alone benign frequency threshold of 1%. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| BS1 | Not met | This variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and gnomAD v4.1 and therefore does not meet the benign strong frequency threshold of 0.3%. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| BS2 | Not assessed | No evidence was identified showing this variant in healthy adult individuals in a context sufficient to support BS2. |
|
| BS3 | Not assessed | No well-established functional study showing no damaging effect was identified for this variant, so BS3 cannot be applied. |
|
| BS4 | Not assessed | No non-segregation data were identified for this variant, so BS4 cannot be assessed. |
|
| BP1 | N/A | BP1 is a missense-specific criterion and is not applicable to this duplication. |
|
| BP2 | Not assessed | No phase data or additional variant data were identified to support BP2. |
|
| BP3 | Not assessed | No evidence was identified showing that this duplication lies within a repetitive region without known function in a way that would support BP3. |
|
| BP4 | Not met | Available computational evidence does not support a benign interpretation. SpliceAI predicts a substantial splice effect with a maximum delta score of 0.91, which argues against BP4. |
spliceai
|
| BP5 | Not assessed | No alternate molecular explanation was identified that would allow BP5 to be assessed. |
|
| BP6 | Not assessed | No reputable source benign classification was identified for this exact variant. This variant is absent from ClinVar, so BP6 is not met. |
clinvar
|
| BP7 | Not met | BP7 is not supported because computational evidence predicts splice disruption rather than no impact on splicing. SpliceAI shows a maximum delta score of 0.91. |
spliceai
|
Disclaimer:
The content and results provided by LYFE Sciences are for research and educational purposes only and must not be used as a substitute for professional medical judgment, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making any clinical decisions.