LYFE Sciences · Project HERA
Variant Interpretation · Classification Report
Variant classification summary
NM_007194.4:c.-6-8T>G
CHEK2
· NP_009125.1:p.?
· NM_007194.4
GRCh37: chr22:29130723 A>C
·
GRCh38: chr22:28734735 A>C
Gene:
CHEK2
Transcript:
NM_007194.4
Final call
VUS
PM2 supporting
BP4 supporting
Variant details
Gene
CHEK2
Transcript
NM_007194.4
Protein
NP_009125.1:p.?
gnomAD AF
ClinVar
OncoKB
Classification rationale
Interpretation summary
Generated evidence synthesis
1
The CHEK2 NM_007194.4:c.-6-8T>G (NP_009125.1:p.?) variant has been reported in ClinVar as likely benign by a single clinical laboratory.
2
This variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and is present only 3 times in 1,612,954 alleles in gnomAD v4.1 (overall AF 1.85994e-06; highest observed population AF 1.6001e-05), supporting rarity but not a benign frequency threshold.
3
In silico splicing analysis does not support a meaningful splice effect, with SpliceAI showing a maximum delta score of 0.10.
Final determination:
Generic ACMG/AMP 2015 fallback rules identified both pathogenic and benign evidence, so the overall classification remains Variant of Uncertain Significance because the evidence is conflicting.
Criteria assessment
ACMG/AMP criteria review
Criteria shown when status is available
All criteria require review: For research and educational purposes only.
| Criterion | Status | Rationale | Evidence used |
|---|---|---|---|
| PVS1 | N/A | This intronic variant is outside the canonical splice ±1,2 positions, and the generic PVS1 assessment concluded that it does not fall into the default null-variant categories used for PVS1. Although loss of function is an established CHEK2 disease mechanism, available evidence does not show that this specific non-canonical intronic change causes loss of function. |
pvs1_gene_context
pvs1_variant_assessment
pvs1_generic_framework
|
| PS1 | N/A | This variant does not have a defined protein consequence, so there is no basis to assess whether it produces the same amino acid change as an established pathogenic variant. |
|
| PS2 | Not assessed | No confirmed de novo occurrence data were identified for this variant. |
clinvar
|
| PS3 | Not assessed | No well-established functional study was identified showing that this variant damages CHEK2 function or causes abnormal splicing. |
spliceai
|
| PS4 | Not met | Available evidence does not show an increased prevalence of this variant in affected individuals compared with controls. Only a single ClinVar submission was identified, which is insufficient for a case-enrichment assertion. |
clinvar
|
| PM1 | Not met | This variant is located in a non-canonical intronic region rather than a known CHEK2 mutational hotspot or well-established critical functional domain with low benign variation. |
|
| PM2 | Met | This variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and is present only 3 times in 1,612,954 alleles in gnomAD v4.1 (overall AF 1.85994e-06, 0.00019%; highest observed population AF 1.6001e-05, 0.00160%), which is well below a 0.1% rarity threshold and supports rarity. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| PM3 | N/A | PM3 is intended for recessive disorders with pathogenic variants detected in trans, which is not the relevant inheritance framework for CHEK2-related cancer predisposition. |
cspec
|
| PM4 | N/A | This intronic variant does not change protein length and is not an in-frame deletion, insertion, or stop-loss variant. |
|
| PM5 | N/A | This variant does not have a defined missense protein consequence, so there is no basis to compare it with other pathogenic missense changes at the same residue. |
|
| PM6 | Not assessed | No assumed de novo occurrence without parental confirmation was identified for this variant. |
clinvar
|
| PP1 | Not assessed | No segregation data were identified for this variant. |
clinvar
|
| PP2 | N/A | PP2 is a missense-specific criterion and does not apply to this intronic variant. |
|
| PP3 | Not met | Available computational evidence does not support a damaging effect on splicing. SpliceAI showed a maximum delta score of 0.10, which does not indicate a significant splice impact. |
spliceai
|
| PP4 | Not assessed | No phenotype information was provided that would allow assessment of whether the clinical presentation is highly specific for CHEK2-related disease. |
cspec
|
| PP5 | Not assessed | This criterion was not used because assertion-based evidence without accessible supporting data is not considered sufficient for independent classification. |
clinvar
|
| BA1 | Not met | The observed population frequency is far below a stand-alone benign threshold. The highest observed gnomAD v4.1 population frequency is 1.6001e-05 (0.00160%), which is well below 1%. |
gnomad_v4
|
| BS1 | Not met | The observed population frequency is too low for benign strong evidence. The highest observed gnomAD v4.1 population frequency is 1.6001e-05 (0.00160%), which is well below a 0.3% benign threshold. |
gnomad_v4
|
| BS2 | Not assessed | Available population data do not establish this variant as observed in a context that would support BS2 for CHEK2-related disease. |
gnomad_v4
|
| BS3 | Not assessed | No well-established functional study was identified showing that this variant has no damaging effect on CHEK2 function or splicing. |
spliceai
|
| BS4 | Not assessed | No non-segregation data were identified for this variant. |
clinvar
|
| BP1 | N/A | BP1 is a missense-specific criterion and does not apply to this intronic variant. |
|
| BP2 | Not assessed | No phase data with another pathogenic variant were identified for this variant. |
|
| BP3 | N/A | This intronic variant is not an in-frame deletion or insertion in a repetitive region. |
|
| BP4 | Met | Available computational evidence supports no meaningful splice effect. SpliceAI showed a maximum delta score of 0.10, which is below commonly used thresholds for significant splice disruption and argues against an abnormal splicing effect. |
spliceai
|
| BP5 | Not assessed | No alternate molecular explanation for the observed phenotype was provided, so BP5 could not be assessed. |
|
| BP6 | Not assessed | This criterion was not used because assertion-based benign evidence without accessible supporting data is not considered sufficient for independent classification. |
clinvar
|
| BP7 | Not met | Although SpliceAI does not predict a significant splice effect, BP7 was not applied because the reviewed evidence does not provide the additional contextual support typically used for this criterion in a noncoding intronic variant. |
spliceai
cspec
|
Disclaimer:
The content and results provided by LYFE Sciences are for research and educational purposes only and must not be used as a substitute for professional medical judgment, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making any clinical decisions.