LYFE Sciences · Project HERA
Variant Interpretation · Classification Report
Variant classification summary
NM_002691.4:c.2915C>T
POLD1
· NP_002682.2:p.(Pro972Leu)
· NM_002691.4
GRCh37: chr19:50919747 C>T
·
GRCh38: chr19:50416490 C>T
Gene:
POLD1
Transcript:
NM_002691.4
Final call
VUS
PM2 moderate
BP4 supporting
Variant details
Gene
POLD1
Transcript
NM_002691.4
Protein
NP_002682.2:p.(Pro972Leu)
gnomAD AF
ClinVar
OncoKB
Unknown Oncogenic Effect
Classification rationale
Interpretation summary
Generated evidence synthesis
1
The POLD1 c.2915C>T (p.Pro972Leu) variant has been reported in ClinVar as a variant of uncertain significance by one clinical laboratory.
2
This variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and has 0/1,552,088 alleles in gnomAD v4.1, which is below the 0.1% threshold used to support rarity.
3
Cancer Hotspots did not identify residue Pro972 as a statistically significant hotspot, which does not support application of PM1.
4
Available computational evidence does not support a damaging or splice-altering effect, with REVEL 0.274, BayesDel -0.220831, and SpliceAI maximum delta score 0.01.
Final determination:
Generic ACMG/AMP 2015 fallback rules identified both pathogenic and benign evidence, so the overall classification remains Variant of Uncertain Significance because the evidence is conflicting.
Criteria assessment
ACMG/AMP criteria review
Criteria shown when status is available
All criteria require review: For research and educational purposes only.
| Criterion | Status | Rationale | Evidence used |
|---|---|---|---|
| PVS1 | N/A | This is a missense variant, NM_002691.4:c.2915C>T (p.Pro972Leu), and it does not fall within the generic PVS1 null-variant categories of nonsense, frameshift, or canonical +/-1,2 splice variants. Although gene-level review supports that loss of function can be a disease mechanism in POLD1, the generic PVS1 scaffold does not support applying PVS1 to this amino acid substitution. |
pvs1_gene_context
pvs1_variant_assessment
pvs1_generic_framework
|
| PS1 | Not assessed | No evidence was identified showing that this same amino acid change, p.Pro972Leu, has already been established as pathogenic through a different nucleotide change. |
clinvar
|
| PS2 | Not met | No confirmed de novo occurrence with established maternity and paternity was identified for this variant. |
clinvar
|
| PS3 | Not met | No well-established functional study for this exact variant was identified demonstrating a damaging effect on POLD1 function. |
oncokb
PMID:28492532
|
| PS4 | Not met | This variant has not been shown to be significantly enriched in affected individuals compared with controls. Current evidence shows one ClinVar submission and no case-control enrichment data. |
clinvar
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| PM1 | Not met | Available hotspot evidence does not support that residue Pro972 lies in a well-established mutational hotspot or critical region without benign variation. Cancer Hotspots did not identify this residue as a statistically significant hotspot. |
hotspots
oncokb
|
| PM2 | Met | This variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and observed at 0/1,552,088 alleles in gnomAD v4.1, which is below the 0.1% threshold used to support rarity in non-VCEP review. These data support that the variant is rare in population databases. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| PM3 | Not assessed | No evidence was identified showing this variant in trans with a pathogenic variant in a recessive disorder context. |
|
| PM4 | N/A | This criterion applies to protein length changes from in-frame insertions/deletions or stop-loss variants, and this variant is a missense substitution. |
|
| PM5 | Not assessed | No evidence was identified showing a different pathogenic missense change at codon 972 that would support PM5. |
clinvar
|
| PM6 | Not met | No assumed de novo occurrence without confirmation of maternity and paternity was identified for this variant. |
clinvar
|
| PP1 | Not met | No segregation data were identified showing that this variant tracks with disease in affected relatives. |
clinvar
|
| PP2 | Not assessed | Available evidence for this case does not establish that POLD1 is a gene in which missense variation is a sufficiently common and well-supported disease mechanism to apply PP2 for this variant alone. |
pvs1_gene_context
|
| PP3 | Not met | Available computational evidence does not support a deleterious effect. REVEL is 0.274, BayesDel is -0.220831, and SpliceAI shows a maximum delta score of 0.01, which is below a commonly used 0.20 threshold for significant splice impact. |
revel
bayesdel
spliceai
|
| PP4 | Not assessed | No phenotype or family-history information was provided that is highly specific for a single genetic etiology and attributable to this variant. |
|
| PP5 | Not assessed | No reputable-source pathogenic assertion was used without access to the underlying evidence. The available ClinVar record is a single-submitter VUS and does not support PP5. |
clinvar
|
| BA1 | Not met | Population frequency does not meet the benign stand-alone threshold. gnomAD v4.1 shows 0/1,552,088 alleles (0.00000%), which is below the 1% BA1 threshold. |
gnomad_v4
|
| BS1 | Not met | Population frequency does not meet the benign strong threshold. gnomAD v4.1 shows 0/1,552,088 alleles (0.00000%), which is below the 0.3% BS1 threshold. |
gnomad_v4
|
| BS2 | Not met | This variant was not observed in population databases in a manner that would support occurrence in healthy adults at a frequency expected for BS2. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| BS3 | Not met | No well-established functional study for this exact variant was identified showing normal POLD1 function. |
oncokb
PMID:28492532
|
| BS4 | Not met | No non-segregation data were identified showing that this variant fails to track with disease in a family. |
clinvar
|
| BP1 | Not assessed | Available evidence does not establish that POLD1 is a gene in which truncating variants are the primary disease mechanism such that a missense variant would favor BP1. |
pvs1_gene_context
|
| BP2 | Not assessed | No phase information was identified showing this variant in trans with a pathogenic variant for a dominant disorder or in cis with a pathogenic variant in a way that would support BP2. |
|
| BP3 | N/A | This criterion applies to in-frame indels in repetitive regions without known function, and this variant is a missense substitution. |
|
| BP4 | Met | Multiple computational results do not support a damaging or splice-altering effect. REVEL is 0.274, BayesDel is -0.220831, and SpliceAI shows a maximum delta score of 0.01, which is below a commonly used 0.20 threshold for significant splice impact. |
revel
bayesdel
spliceai
|
| BP5 | Not assessed | No alternate molecular diagnosis or other clearly explanatory variant data were provided to support BP5. |
|
| BP6 | Not assessed | No reputable-source benign assertion was used without access to the underlying evidence. The available ClinVar record is a single-submitter VUS and does not support BP6. |
clinvar
|
| BP7 | N/A | This criterion applies to synonymous variants with no predicted splice impact, and this variant is a missense substitution. |
|
Disclaimer:
The content and results provided by LYFE Sciences are for research and educational purposes only and must not be used as a substitute for professional medical judgment, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making any clinical decisions.