LYFE Sciences · Project HERA
Variant Interpretation · Classification Report
Variant classification summary
NM_006231.4:c.4952+9A>G
POLE
· NP_006222.2:p.?
· NM_006231.4
GRCh37: chr12:133219083 T>C
·
GRCh38: chr12:132642497 T>C
Gene:
POLE
Transcript:
NM_006231.4
Final call
VUS
PM2_Supporting
BP4_Supporting
Variant details
Gene
POLE
Transcript
NM_006231.4
Protein
NP_006222.2:p.?
gnomAD AF
ClinVar
OncoKB
Classification rationale
Interpretation summary
Generated evidence synthesis
1
The POLE c.4952+9A>G (p.?) variant has not been identified in the León-Castillo endometrial carcinoma recurrence table and has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign by one clinical laboratory.
2
This variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and present once in gnomAD v4.1 (1/1613298 alleles; AF 6.20e-07), which supports rarity but does not establish pathogenic enrichment.
3
SpliceAI predicts low splice impact for NM_006231.4 with a maximum delta score of 0.07, arguing against a clinically meaningful splicing effect.
Final determination:
Under the León-Castillo et al. 2020 custom POLE framework, the combination of one supporting pathogenic criterion and one supporting benign criterion does not meet thresholds for either a pathogenic/likely pathogenic or benign/likely benign classification; therefore, the variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance.
Criteria assessment
ACMG/AMP criteria review
Criteria shown when status is available
All criteria require review: For research and educational purposes only.
| Criterion | Status | Rationale | Evidence used |
|---|---|---|---|
| PVS1 | N/A | Although POLE is flagged as eligible for generic PVS1 consideration at the gene level, this variant is an intronic +9 change and does not fall within the generic PVS1 null-variant categories of nonsense, frameshift, or canonical ±1,2 splice-site variants. PVS1 is therefore not applied. |
pvs1_gene_context
pvs1_variant_assessment
pvs1_generic_framework
|
| PS1 | N/A | PS1 applies to a different nucleotide change causing the same amino acid substitution. This intronic variant has no defined amino acid substitution, so PS1 is not applicable. |
|
| PS2 | Not assessed | No confirmed de novo data with verified maternity and paternity were identified for this variant. |
|
| PS3 | Not assessed | No published functional assay demonstrating an abnormal effect of this specific intronic variant was identified. |
|
| PS4 | Not met | The local POLE framework limits PS4 to exact recurrent exonuclease-domain missense variants in the established pathogenic set with combined COSMIC and TCGA endometrial carcinoma counts of at least 10. This intronic variant is not listed in the recurrence table, and no germline case-control or multiple unrelated affected-proband evidence was identified. |
final_classification_framework
vcep_path_250_323_s002
clinvar
|
| PM1 | N/A | The local POLE PM1 framework is restricted to exact exonuclease-domain hotspot or recurrent missense substitutions highlighted by León-Castillo et al. This intronic +9 variant is not a missense exonuclease-domain hotspot and is not listed in the recurrence table, so PM1 is not applicable. |
final_classification_framework
vcep_path_250_323
vcep_path_250_323_s002
|
| PM2 | Met | This variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and present once in gnomAD v4.1 (1/1613298 alleles; AF 6.20e-07; highest population AF 1.10e-05 in South Asian individuals), which is below the project's PM2 threshold of 0.1% and supports rarity in the general population. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| PM3 | Not assessed | No phase data or recessive case evidence relevant to PM3 were identified. |
|
| PM4 | Not assessed | This variant is intronic and does not directly demonstrate a protein length change. No RNA evidence was identified to show in-frame exon loss or other protein-length alteration. |
|
| PM5 | N/A | PM5 applies to a novel missense change at an amino acid residue where a different pathogenic missense change is established. This intronic variant has no amino acid substitution, so PM5 is not applicable. |
|
| PM6 | Not assessed | No assumed de novo evidence without full parental confirmation was identified. |
|
| PP1 | Not assessed | No segregation data were identified for this variant. |
|
| PP2 | N/A | PP2 is a missense-based criterion and does not apply to this intronic variant. |
|
| PP3 | Not met | Available computational evidence does not support a damaging splicing effect. SpliceAI for NM_006231.4 shows DS_AG 0.00, DS_AL 0.01, DS_DG 0.07, and DS_DL 0.00, with a maximum delta score of 0.07, and no REVEL or BayesDel score is available for this intronic variant. |
spliceai
|
| PP4 | Not assessed | No phenotype-specific evidence was identified to show that the clinical presentation is highly specific for a POLE-related disorder caused by this variant. |
|
| PP5 | Not assessed | No reputable-source pathogenic classification was used as stand-alone evidence for this variant. |
|
| BA1 | Not met | This variant does not meet the BA1 population threshold. Its gnomAD v4.1 allele frequency is 6.20e-07 overall and 1.10e-05 in the highest-frequency population, both well below the project's BA1 threshold of 1%. |
gnomad_v4
|
| BS1 | Not met | This variant does not meet the BS1 population threshold. Its highest observed gnomAD v4.1 population frequency is 1.10e-05, which is below the project's BS1 threshold of 0.3%. |
gnomad_v4
|
| BS2 | Not assessed | No evidence was identified showing this variant in healthy adult individuals at a level sufficient for BS2. |
|
| BS3 | Not assessed | No published functional study demonstrating a normal effect of this specific variant was identified. |
|
| BS4 | Not assessed | No segregation data were identified showing lack of segregation with disease. |
|
| BP1 | N/A | BP1 is a missense-based criterion and does not apply to this intronic variant. |
|
| BP2 | Not assessed | No phase information was identified to assess BP2. |
|
| BP3 | Not assessed | This criterion was not assessed because the variant is not an in-frame deletion or insertion in a repetitive region. |
|
| BP4 | Met | Computational splicing prediction supports no meaningful splice effect. SpliceAI for NM_006231.4 shows DS_AG 0.00, DS_AL 0.01, DS_DG 0.07, and DS_DL 0.00, with a maximum delta score of 0.07, which is below commonly used concern thresholds for splice disruption. |
spliceai
|
| BP5 | Not assessed | No alternate molecular explanation sufficient to account for the phenotype independently of this variant was identified. |
|
| BP6 | Not assessed | Although ClinVar contains a Likely benign submission for this variant, a reputable-source benign assertion was not used as stand-alone evidence. |
clinvar
|
| BP7 | Not assessed | This intronic +9 variant has low predicted splice impact by SpliceAI, but no additional conservation-based or framework-specific BP7 assessment was available to support formal application of BP7. |
spliceai
|
Disclaimer:
The content and results provided by LYFE Sciences are for research and educational purposes only and must not be used as a substitute for professional medical judgment, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making any clinical decisions.