LYFE Sciences · Project HERA
Variant Interpretation · Classification Report
Variant classification summary
NM_004985.4:c.24A>G
KRAS
· NP_004976.2:p.(Val8=)
· NM_004985.4
GRCh37: chr12:25398295 T>C
·
GRCh38: chr12:25245361 T>C
Gene:
KRAS
Transcript:
NM_004985.4
Final call
Benign
BS1 strong
BA1 stand-alone benign
BP4 supporting
BP6 supporting benign
Variant details
Gene
KRAS
Transcript
NM_004985.4
Protein
NP_004976.2:p.(Val8=)
gnomAD AF
ClinVar
OncoKB
Unknown Oncogenic Effect
Classification rationale
Interpretation summary
Generated evidence synthesis
1
The KRAS c.24A>G (p.Val8=) variant has been reported in ClinVar with an expert panel classification of likely benign, with additional benign and likely benign clinical laboratory submissions.
2
This variant is present in population databases at a frequency above the KRAS VCEP benign thresholds, with grpmax filtering allele frequencies of 0.0402% in gnomAD v2.1 and 0.056632% in gnomAD v4.1, exceeding the BS1 threshold of 0.025% and the BA1 threshold of 0.05% in v4.1.
3
SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant, with a maximum delta score of 0.02, supporting no expected clinically meaningful effect on splicing.
Final determination:
Rule17 in the ClinGen RASopathy Expert Panel Specifications to the ACMG/AMP Variant Interpretation Guidelines for KRAS Version 2.3.0 v2.3.0 criteria-combination framework is satisfied by the adjudicated criteria, so the variant is classified as Benign.
Criteria assessment
ACMG/AMP criteria review
Criteria shown when status is available
All criteria require review: For research and educational purposes only.
| Criterion | Status | Rationale | Evidence used |
|---|---|---|---|
| BP7 | Not assessed | This synonymous variant has no predicted splice effect by SpliceAI (max delta score 0.02), but the KRAS VCEP rule for BP7 also requires that the altered nucleotide is not highly conserved, and no conservation evidence was identified here. |
cspec
spliceai
|
| PM5 | Not met | This variant is synonymous and does not create a novel amino acid substitution, so it does not meet the KRAS VCEP PM5 rule for a different missense change at the same codon. |
cspec
|
| BP5 | Not assessed | No evidence was identified for an alternative molecular explanation of a RASopathy phenotype in another gene, so BP5 could not be evaluated. |
cspec
|
| BP3 | N/A | BP3 is not applicable in the KRAS RASopathy VCEP framework. |
cspec
|
| PP1 | Not assessed | No segregation data were identified for this variant, so PP1 could not be assessed. |
cspec
|
| BS1 | Met | This variant is present in gnomAD above the KRAS VCEP BS1 threshold of 0.025% filtering allele frequency. The observed grpmax FAF is 0.0402% in gnomAD v2.1 and 0.056632% in gnomAD v4.1, both above the BS1 threshold. |
cspec
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| PP5 | N/A | PP5 is not for use in this VCEP framework. |
cspec
|
| BP1 | Not met | This variant is a synonymous substitution rather than a truncating loss-of-function variant, so it does not meet the KRAS VCEP BP1 rule. |
cspec
pvs1_variant_assessment
|
| BP2 | Not assessed | No phase data or evidence of another pathogenic RASopathy variant in the same gene were identified, so BP2 could not be assessed. |
cspec
|
| BA1 | Met | This variant is present in gnomAD above the KRAS VCEP BA1 threshold of 0.05% filtering allele frequency. The gnomAD v4.1 grpmax FAF is 0.056632%, which is above the BA1 threshold. |
cspec
gnomad_v4
|
| PS3 | Not met | No approved variant-specific functional study was identified showing a damaging effect for this synonymous KRAS variant, so PS3 is not met. |
cspec
vcep_svi_rasopathy_vcep_v2_approved_functional_studies
|
| PM4 | Not met | This variant does not alter protein length and is not an in-frame insertion, in-frame deletion, or stop-loss variant, so PM4 is not met. |
cspec
|
| BS3 | N/A | BS3 is not applicable in the KRAS RASopathy VCEP framework. |
cspec
|
| PM1 | Not met | Codon 8 is outside the KRAS VCEP PM1 domains P-loop (amino acids 10-17), Switch I (25-40), Switch II (57-64), and SAK (145-156), and no hotspot evidence was identified for this residue, so PM1 is not met. |
cspec
vcep_alignment_with_pm1_domains_pptx
hotspots
|
| BS2 | Not assessed | Population frequency data alone do not establish observation in clinically evaluated unaffected individuals under the KRAS VCEP BS2 point-based framework, so BS2 was not assessed. |
cspec
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| PP2 | N/A | PP2 is not applicable in this VCEP framework. |
cspec
|
| PM6 | Not assessed | No assumed de novo report without confirmed parentage was identified for this variant, so PM6 could not be assessed. |
cspec
|
| BS4 | Not assessed | No informative non-segregation data were identified for this variant, so BS4 could not be assessed. |
cspec
|
| PS2 | Not assessed | No confirmed de novo occurrence with maternity and paternity confirmation was identified for this variant, so PS2 could not be assessed. |
cspec
|
| PS4 | Not met | No evidence was identified that this variant is enriched in individuals with a KRAS-related RASopathy, and no exact proband count meeting the KRAS VCEP point thresholds was found, so PS4 is not met. |
cspec
clinvar
|
| PVS1 | N/A | PVS1 is not applicable in the KRAS VCEP framework for this variant, and this synonymous change is not a null variant within the generic PVS1 categories. |
cspec
pvs1_gene_context
pvs1_variant_assessment
|
| PS1 | Not met | This variant does not change the amino acid sequence, so it does not meet PS1 for the same amino acid change as a previously established pathogenic variant. |
cspec
|
| PM3 | N/A | PM3 is not applicable in the KRAS RASopathy VCEP framework. |
cspec
|
| PP4 | N/A | PP4 is not applicable in this VCEP framework because phenotype-based evidence is handled through other RASopathy-specific criteria. |
cspec
|
| PM2 | Not met | This variant is present in gnomAD and therefore does not meet the KRAS VCEP PM2 rule requiring absence from controls. |
cspec
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| BP4 | Met | SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this synonymous variant, with a maximum delta score of 0.02, which supports a negligible effect on splicing and meets BP4 at supporting strength. |
cspec
spliceai
|
| PP3 | Not met | Available computational evidence does not support a deleterious effect. SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact with a maximum delta score of 0.02, and no REVEL, BayesDel, or HCI prior score was available for this synonymous variant. |
cspec
spliceai
|
| BP6 | Met | Expert panel ClinGen RASopathy Variant Curation Expert Panel classified as Likely benign. |
cspec
clinvar
|
Disclaimer:
The content and results provided by LYFE Sciences are for research and educational purposes only and must not be used as a substitute for professional medical judgment, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making any clinical decisions.