LYFE Sciences · Project HERA
Variant Interpretation · Classification Report
Variant classification summary
NM_007294.3:c.4211T>G
BRCA1
· NP_009225.1:p.(Leu1404Arg)
· NM_007294.3
GRCh37: chr17:41234567 A>C
·
GRCh38: chr17:43082550 A>C
Gene:
BRCA1
Transcript:
NM_007294.3
Final call
BP4_Supporting
Variant details
Gene
BRCA1
Transcript
NM_007294.3
Protein
NP_009225.1:p.(Leu1404Arg)
gnomAD AF
ClinVar
OncoKB
Unknown Oncogenic Effect
Classification rationale
Interpretation summary
Generated evidence synthesis
1
The BRCA1 c.4211T>G (p.Leu1404Arg) variant has been reported in ClinVar, including an ENIGMA expert-panel classification of uncertain significance.
2
This variant is very rare in population databases, with 1 of 251348 alleles in gnomAD v2.1 (AF 3.97855e-06; highest observed East Asian AF 5.43892e-05) and no observation in gnomAD v4.1.
3
In silico evidence supports a benign computational interpretation under the ENIGMA BRCA1 framework because the variant is in the coiled-coil domain, BayesDel no-AF is 0.094842 (BP4 threshold ≤0.15), and SpliceAI max delta score is 0.02 (BP4 threshold ≤0.1); REVEL is 0.331 but does not alter the VCEP rule assignment.
Final determination:
BP4_Supporting alone does not meet the ENIGMA Table 3 threshold for Likely Benign or Benign classification; therefore the variant is classified as Uncertain Significance.
Criteria assessment
ACMG/AMP criteria review
Criteria shown when status is available
All criteria require review: For research and educational purposes only.
| Criterion | Status | Rationale | Evidence used |
|---|---|---|---|
| PVS1 | N/A | This variant is a missense substitution, p.(Leu1404Arg), and does not fall into the BRCA1 loss-of-function categories used for PVS1 such as nonsense, frameshift, or canonical ±1,2 splice variants. |
cspec
pvs1_variant_assessment
pvs1_gene_context
|
| PS1 | Not assessed | No previously classified variant causing the same amino acid change was identified in the reviewed BRCA1 materials, so PS1 could not be established from the available evidence. |
cspec
|
| PS2 | N/A | This BRCA1 specification marks PS2 as not applicable for this framework. |
cspec
|
| PS3 | Not assessed | No variant-specific damaging functional result for c.4211T>G (p.Leu1404Arg) was identified in the reviewed ENIGMA BRCA1 curated functional tables, so PS3 is not established from the available evidence. |
vcep_specifications_table9_v1_2_2024_11_18
vcep_supplementarytables_v1_2_2024_11_18
|
| PS4 | Not assessed | This variant has been reported in ClinVar, but no case-control evidence showing significant enrichment in affected individuals at the ENIGMA BRCA1 PS4 threshold was identified. |
cspec
clinvar
|
| PM1 | N/A | This BRCA1 specification marks PM1 as not applicable in this framework. |
cspec
|
| PM2 | Not met | This variant is not absent from controls because it is present once in gnomAD v2.1 (1/251348 alleles; AF 3.97855e-06; highest observed East Asian AF 5.43892e-05), even though it is absent from gnomAD v4.1. The ENIGMA BRCA1 PM2 rule requires absence from controls, so PM2 is not met. |
cspec
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| PM3 | Not assessed | No evidence was identified that this variant occurred with a second BRCA1 variant in a person with BRCA1-related Fanconi anemia, so PM3 could not be assessed. |
cspec
|
| PM4 | N/A | This BRCA1 specification marks PM4 as not applicable in this framework. |
cspec
|
| PM5 | N/A | In this BRCA1 specification, PM5 is used for protein-truncating variants with a premature termination codon in eligible exons. This variant is missense, so PM5 is not applicable. |
cspec
vcep_specifications_table4_v1_2_2024_11_18
|
| PM6 | N/A | This BRCA1 specification marks PM6 as not applicable for this framework. |
cspec
|
| PP1 | Not assessed | No quantitative co-segregation evidence for this exact variant was identified, so PP1 could not be assessed. |
cspec
vcep_humu_40_1557_s001
|
| PP2 | N/A | This BRCA1 specification marks PP2 as not applicable in this framework. |
cspec
|
| PP3 | Not met | Available computational evidence does not support PP3 under the ENIGMA BRCA1 rule. BayesDel no-AF is 0.094842, which is below the PP3 threshold of ≥0.28, and SpliceAI max delta score is 0.02, which is below the splice threshold of ≥0.2. REVEL is 0.331, but ENIGMA BRCA1 uses BayesDel and SpliceAI for this rule. |
cspec
bayesdel
spliceai
revel
|
| PP4 | Not assessed | No variant-specific clinical-history likelihood ratio was identified for this exact BRCA1 variant in the reviewed clinical-history resource, so PP4 could not be assigned. |
cspec
vcep_pmid_31853058_brca1_clinical_history_lr
PMID:31853058
|
| PP5 | N/A | This BRCA1 specification marks PP5 as not applicable in this framework. |
cspec
|
| BA1 | Not met | Population data do not meet BA1. The variant was seen once in gnomAD v2.1 and was absent from gnomAD v4.1, and no non-founder population frequency above the BRCA1 BA1 threshold was identified. |
cspec
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| BS1 | Not met | Population data do not meet BS1. The variant is very rare in gnomAD v2.1 and absent from gnomAD v4.1, and no non-founder population filter allele frequency above the BRCA1 BS1 thresholds was identified. |
cspec
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| BS2 | Not assessed | No evidence was identified showing this variant in individuals meeting the BRCA1 BS2 framework for absence of Fanconi anemia features, so BS2 could not be assessed. |
cspec
|
| BS3 | Not assessed | No variant-specific benign functional result for c.4211T>G (p.Leu1404Arg) was identified in the reviewed ENIGMA BRCA1 curated functional tables, so BS3 is not established from the available evidence. |
vcep_specifications_table9_v1_2_2024_11_18
vcep_supplementarytables_v1_2_2024_11_18
|
| BS4 | Not assessed | No quantitative lack-of-segregation evidence for this exact variant was identified, so BS4 could not be assessed. |
cspec
vcep_humu_40_1557_s001
|
| BP1 | Not met | This missense variant is in the BRCA1 coiled-coil domain (aa 1391-1424), which is a clinically important functional domain in the ENIGMA BRCA1 specification, so it does not meet BP1_Strong for variants outside such domains. |
cspec
vcep_appendices_v1_2_2024_11_18
spliceai
|
| BP2 | N/A | This BRCA1 specification marks BP2 as not applicable in this framework. |
cspec
|
| BP3 | N/A | This BRCA1 specification marks BP3 as not applicable in this framework. |
cspec
|
| BP4 | Met | This missense variant lies in the BRCA1 coiled-coil domain (aa 1391-1424). BayesDel no-AF is 0.094842, which is below the BRCA1 BP4 threshold of ≤0.15, and SpliceAI max delta score is 0.02, which is below the ≤0.1 splice threshold. These findings support BP4_Supporting under the ENIGMA BRCA1 rule. REVEL is 0.331 and does not change the VCEP rule assignment. |
cspec
vcep_appendices_v1_2_2024_11_18
bayesdel
spliceai
revel
|
| BP5 | Not assessed | No variant-specific clinical-history likelihood ratio in the benign direction was identified for this exact BRCA1 variant in the reviewed clinical-history resource, so BP5 could not be assigned. |
cspec
vcep_pmid_31853058_brca1_clinical_history_lr
PMID:31853058
|
| BP6 | N/A | This BRCA1 specification marks BP6 as not applicable in this framework. |
cspec
|
| BP7 | Not assessed | No RNA study showing no transcript effect was identified for this variant. SpliceAI predicts little splice effect (max delta score 0.02), but BP7 in this framework requires the variant-type and study conditions described by the BRCA1 specification, so BP7 is not established from the available evidence. |
cspec
spliceai
|
Disclaimer:
The content and results provided by LYFE Sciences are for research and educational purposes only and must not be used as a substitute for professional medical judgment, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making any clinical decisions.