LYFE Sciences · Project HERA
Variant Interpretation · Classification Report
Variant classification summary
NM_001354609.1:c.722C>A
BRAF
· NP_001341538.1:p.(Thr241Lys)
· NM_001354609.1
GRCh37: chr7:140501350 G>T
·
GRCh38: chr7:140801550 G>T
Gene:
BRAF
Transcript:
NM_001354609.1
Final call
Likely Pathogenic
PM1 moderate
PM2 supporting
PM5 moderate
PP3 supporting
PP5 supporting
Variant details
Gene
BRAF
Transcript
NM_001354609.1
Protein
NP_001341538.1:p.(Thr241Lys)
gnomAD AF
ClinVar
OncoKB
Likely Oncogenic
Classification rationale
Interpretation summary
Generated evidence synthesis
1
The BRAF c.722C>A (p.Thr241Lys) variant has not been observed in somatic cancers in COSMIC and has been reported in ClinVar, including a Pathogenic expert-panel classification from the ClinGen RASopathy Variant Curation Expert Panel.
2
This variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and gnomAD v4.1, which supports rarity in reference populations.
3
A different missense change at the same residue, p.Thr241Pro, is listed as pathogenic/likely pathogenic in the RASopathy VCEP approved functional-study materials, supporting same-residue evidence under the BRAF specification.
4
Computational evidence supports a deleterious missense effect because REVEL is 0.946, above the BRAF PP3 threshold of 0.7, while SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact with a maximum delta score of 0.04.
Final determination:
Rule14 in the ClinGen RASopathy Expert Panel Specifications to the ACMG/AMP Variant Interpretation Guidelines for BRAF Version 2.3.0 v2.3.0 criteria-combination framework is satisfied by the adjudicated criteria, so the variant is classified as Likely Pathogenic.
Criteria assessment
ACMG/AMP criteria review
Criteria shown when status is available
All criteria require review: For research and educational purposes only.
| Criterion | Status | Rationale | Evidence used |
|---|---|---|---|
| PVS1 | N/A | This is a missense variant and does not fall into the null-variant categories used for PVS1; the BRAF RASopathy specification also marks PVS1 as not applicable for this case. |
cspec
pvs1_variant_assessment
|
| PS1 | Not met | No evidence was identified that a different nucleotide change produces the same p.(Thr241Lys) amino acid substitution with an established pathogenic classification. |
cspec
|
| PS2 | Not assessed | No parentage-confirmed de novo report for this exact variant was identified from the available evidence, so the point-based de novo criterion cannot be assigned here. |
cspec
PMID:19206169
|
| PS3 | Not assessed | Published and curated functional materials were available for review, but no approved functional assay result for p.(Thr241Lys) itself was identified here, so PS3 cannot be assigned on the current evidence. |
cspec
vcep_svi_rasopathy_vcep_v2_approved_functional_studies
PMID:19206169
PMID:28404629
|
| PS4 | Not assessed | This variant has been reported in ClinVar, including by the ClinGen RASopathy expert panel, but the available evidence does not provide the case counts or PS4 point total needed for the RASopathy point-based enrichment criterion. |
clinvar
cspec
PMID:17704260
PMID:18042262
PMID:19206169
|
| PM1 | Met | This missense variant is located in BRAF exon 6, which is explicitly listed by the BRAF RASopathy specification as a critical and well-established functional region for PM1. |
cspec
|
| PM2 | Met | This variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and absent from gnomAD v4.1, meeting the RASopathy specification requirement that the variant be absent from controls for PM2_Supporting. |
cspec
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| PM3 | N/A | PM3 is not applicable in this BRAF RASopathy framework. |
cspec
|
| PM4 | N/A | This is a missense substitution and not a protein length-changing variant, so PM4 does not apply. |
cspec
|
| PM5 | Met | A different missense change at the same residue, p.(Thr241Pro), is listed as pathogenic/likely pathogenic in the RASopathy VCEP approved functional-study materials, satisfying the BRAF same-codon PM5 rule for one established pathogenic or likely pathogenic residue change. |
cspec
vcep_svi_rasopathy_vcep_v2_approved_functional_studies
|
| PM6 | Not assessed | No assumed de novo report with sufficient case-level detail for this exact variant was identified, so PM6 cannot be assigned from the current evidence. |
cspec
PMID:19206169
|
| PP1 | Not assessed | No segregation data were identified for this exact variant, so co-segregation evidence cannot be counted. |
cspec
|
| PP2 | Not assessed | The BRAF RASopathy specification allows PP2 when the gnomAD missense z score is greater than 3.09, but a citable gene-level constraint value was not provided in the case materials, so this criterion is left for manual confirmation. |
cspec
|
| PP3 | Met | Computational evidence supports a deleterious missense effect: REVEL is 0.946, which is above the BRAF RASopathy PP3 threshold of 0.7, BayesDel is 0.468035, and SpliceAI predicts no meaningful splice disruption (max delta score 0.04), supporting a protein-level rather than splice-mediated effect. |
cspec
revel
bayesdel
spliceai
|
| PP4 | N/A | PP4 is not applicable in this BRAF RASopathy framework. |
cspec
|
| PP5 | Met | Expert panel ClinGen RASopathy Variant Curation Expert Panel classified as Pathogenic. |
cspec
clinvar
|
| BA1 | Not met | This variant is absent from gnomAD and does not meet the BRAF RASopathy BA1 stand-alone benign frequency threshold of 0.05%. |
cspec
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| BS1 | Not met | This variant is absent from gnomAD and does not meet the BRAF RASopathy BS1 benign frequency threshold of 0.025%. |
cspec
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| BS2 | Not assessed | No evidence was identified showing this variant in unaffected individuals at the point threshold required for BS2. |
cspec
|
| BS3 | N/A | BS3 is not applicable in this BRAF RASopathy framework. |
cspec
|
| BS4 | Not assessed | No non-segregation data were identified for this variant, so BS4 cannot be applied. |
cspec
|
| BP1 | N/A | This is not a truncating or loss-of-function variant, so the BRAF RASopathy BP1 rule does not apply. |
cspec
|
| BP2 | Not assessed | No phase or alternate-molecular-explanation data were identified to support BP2. |
cspec
|
| BP3 | N/A | BP3 is not applicable in this BRAF RASopathy framework. |
cspec
|
| BP4 | Not met | Computational results do not support a benign interpretation for this missense change because REVEL is 0.946, which is above the benign BP4 threshold of 0.3. |
cspec
revel
spliceai
|
| BP5 | Not assessed | No evidence was identified for an alternate molecular explanation meeting the point threshold for BP5. |
cspec
|
| BP6 | N/A | BP6 is not applicable in this BRAF RASopathy framework. |
cspec
|
| BP7 | N/A | This is not a synonymous, intronic, or non-coding variant, so BP7 does not apply. |
cspec
spliceai
|
Disclaimer:
The content and results provided by LYFE Sciences are for research and educational purposes only and must not be used as a substitute for professional medical judgment, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making any clinical decisions.