LYFE Sciences · Project HERA
Variant Interpretation · Classification Report
Variant classification summary
NM_001127500.3:c.110T>C
MET
· NP_001120972.1:p.(Val37Ala)
· NM_001127500.3
GRCh37: chr7:116339248 T>C
·
GRCh38: chr7:116699194 T>C
Gene:
MET
Transcript:
NM_001127500.3
Final call
Likely Benign
BS1 strong
BP4 supporting
Variant details
Gene
MET
Transcript
NM_001127500.3
Protein
NP_001120972.1:p.(Val37Ala)
gnomAD AF
ClinVar
OncoKB
Unknown Oncogenic Effect
Classification rationale
Interpretation summary
Generated evidence synthesis
1
The MET c.110T>C (p.Val37Ala) variant has been reported in ClinVar with likely benign and benign submissions.
2
This variant is present in population databases at a frequency above the BS1 threshold, with the highest observed frequency of 0.70588% in South Asian individuals in gnomAD v2.1 and 0.68732% in South Asian individuals in gnomAD v4.1, arguing against a rare pathogenic germline variant.
3
No well-established variant-specific functional study was identified to support either a damaging or a normal effect.
4
Computational evidence supports a benign interpretation, with SpliceAI predicting no significant splice impact (maximum delta score 0.00), REVEL of 0.142, and BayesDel of -0.247812.
Final determination:
Generic ACMG/AMP 2015 fallback rules support a Likely Benign classification because either one strong benign criterion plus one supporting benign criterion, or at least two supporting benign criteria, are present.
Criteria assessment
ACMG/AMP criteria review
Criteria shown when status is available
All criteria require review: For research and educational purposes only.
| Criterion | Status | Rationale | Evidence used |
|---|---|---|---|
| PVS1 | N/A | This variant is a missense substitution, p.(Val37Ala), and does not fall into the generic PVS1 null-variant categories of nonsense, frameshift, or canonical +/-1 or 2 splice variants. |
pvs1_variant_assessment
pvs1_generic_framework
|
| PS1 | Not assessed | No reviewed evidence was identified showing that a different nucleotide change produces the same amino acid substitution with an established pathogenic classification. |
clinvar
|
| PS2 | Not assessed | No confirmed de novo occurrence with verified parentage was identified for this variant. |
|
| PS3 | Not assessed | No well-established functional study demonstrating a damaging effect of this specific variant was identified. |
oncokb
|
| PS4 | Not met | Available evidence does not show enrichment of this variant in affected individuals compared with population databases. The variant is present in ClinVar, but no case-control or multiple affected-case data supporting significant excess were identified. |
clinvar
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| PM1 | Not met | This variant is not supported to lie in a well-established mutational hotspot or critical functional domain without benign variation. Cancer Hotspots did not identify a statistically significant hotspot at codon 37. |
hotspots
oncokb
|
| PM2 | Not met | Population frequency is not low enough for PM2. In gnomAD v2.1 the highest subpopulation frequency is 0.70588% in South Asian individuals, and in gnomAD v4.1 the highest subpopulation frequency is 0.68732% in South Asian individuals, both above the 0.1% PM2 threshold. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| PM3 | N/A | No evidence relevant to trans occurrence in a recessive disease context was identified for this variant. |
|
| PM4 | N/A | This variant is a missense substitution and does not change protein length or create an in-frame insertion or deletion. |
|
| PM5 | N/A | Classic same-residue PM5 comparator logic could not be confirmed for this case, and no reviewed pathogenic same-residue comparator variant was identified. |
pm5_candidates
|
| PM6 | Not assessed | No presumed de novo occurrence without confirmed parentage was identified for this variant. |
|
| PP1 | Not assessed | No segregation data were identified for this variant. |
|
| PP2 | Not assessed | Available evidence does not establish that this gene has a low rate of benign missense variation and that missense variation is the predominant mechanism required for PP2 application in this case. |
|
| PP3 | Not met | Available computational evidence does not support a deleterious effect. SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact with a maximum delta score of 0.00, REVEL is 0.142, and BayesDel is -0.247812. |
spliceai
revel
bayesdel
|
| PP4 | Not assessed | No phenotype-specific evidence was provided to show that the clinical presentation is highly specific for a disorder caused by this gene. |
|
| PP5 | N/A | This criterion was not used because external assertions without primary supporting evidence are not applied here. |
clinvar
|
| BA1 | Not met | Population frequency does not reach the 1% BA1 threshold. The highest observed subpopulation frequency is 0.70588% in gnomAD v2.1 South Asian and 0.68732% in gnomAD v4.1 South Asian. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| BS1 | Met | Population frequency is above the 0.3% BS1 threshold. The highest observed frequency is 0.70588% in gnomAD v2.1 South Asian individuals and 0.68732% in gnomAD v4.1 South Asian individuals, which argues against a rare pathogenic germline variant. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| BS2 | Not assessed | Although this variant is observed in population databases, the available evidence was not sufficient to apply BS2 on the basis of observation in unaffected individuals alone. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| BS3 | Not assessed | No well-established functional study demonstrating normal function of this specific variant was identified. |
oncokb
|
| BS4 | Not assessed | No family data were identified showing lack of segregation of this variant with disease. |
|
| BP1 | N/A | BP1 was not applied because the required pattern of disease being caused primarily by truncating variants was not established for this case. |
|
| BP2 | Not assessed | No phase information was identified to show this variant occurring in trans with a pathogenic variant or in cis with another variant in a way that supports BP2. |
|
| BP3 | N/A | This variant is not an in-frame insertion or deletion in a repetitive region. |
|
| BP4 | Met | Multiple computational results support no damaging effect. SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact with a maximum delta score of 0.00, REVEL is 0.142, and BayesDel is -0.247812, which together support a benign computational interpretation. |
spliceai
revel
bayesdel
|
| BP5 | Not assessed | No alternate molecular diagnosis or other established cause of disease was provided that would support BP5. |
|
| BP6 | N/A | This criterion was not used because external assertions without accessible supporting evidence are not applied here. |
clinvar
|
| BP7 | N/A | This variant is not a synonymous or deep intronic change, so BP7 does not apply. |
|
Disclaimer:
The content and results provided by LYFE Sciences are for research and educational purposes only and must not be used as a substitute for professional medical judgment, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making any clinical decisions.