LYFE Sciences · Project HERA
Variant Interpretation · Classification Report
Variant classification summary
NM_000059.4:c.2259T>C
BRCA2
· NP_000050.3:p.(Phe753=)
· NM_000059.4
GRCh37: chr13:32910751 T>C
·
GRCh38: chr13:32336614 T>C
Gene:
BRCA2
Transcript:
NM_000059.4
Final call
BP1_Strong
Variant details
Gene
BRCA2
Transcript
NM_000059.4
Protein
NP_000050.3:p.(Phe753=)
gnomAD AF
ClinVar
OncoKB
Unknown Oncogenic Effect
Classification rationale
Interpretation summary
Generated evidence synthesis
1
The BRCA2 c.2259T>C (p.Phe753=) variant has been reported in ClinVar with only likely benign submissions.
2
This variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and present in gnomAD v4.1 at 3/1614118 alleles (AF 1.8586e-06; grpmax FAF 6.8e-07), which is far below ENIGMA BRCA2 BA1 and BS1 thresholds but does not satisfy absence from controls for PM2.
3
SpliceAI predicts no meaningful splice effect for this synonymous change (max delta score 0.00), and codon 753 lies outside the ENIGMA-defined BRCA2 clinically important domains, supporting BP1_Strong and not supporting PP3 or PVS1.
Final determination:
BP1_Strong is present as a single strong benign criterion, but this alone does not satisfy the ENIGMA Table 3 thresholds for likely benign or benign classification; the variant is therefore classified as of uncertain significance.
Criteria assessment
ACMG/AMP criteria review
Criteria shown when status is available
All criteria require review: For research and educational purposes only.
| Criterion | Status | Rationale | Evidence used |
|---|---|---|---|
| PVS1 | Not met | This synonymous variant does not fall within the BRCA2 null-variant or canonical splice-site categories used for PVS1, and SpliceAI predicts no splice disruption (max delta score 0.00), so available evidence does not support a loss-of-function effect for this criterion. |
cspec
pvs1_gene_context
pvs1_variant_assessment
spliceai
|
| PS1 | Not assessed | No evidence was identified that this variant produces the same proven pathogenic protein or splice consequence as a previously classified pathogenic or likely pathogenic BRCA2 variant, so PS1 was not assessed. |
cspec
vcep_specifications_v1_2_2024_11_18
|
| PS2 | N/A | The ENIGMA BRCA2 specification marks de novo evidence as not applicable for this gene framework, so PS2 was not applied. |
cspec
|
| PS3 | Not assessed | No calibrated BRCA2 functional assay result for this exact variant was identified in the reviewed BRCA2 functional datasets, so PS3 was not assessed. |
cspec
vcep_specifications_table9_v1_2_2024_11_18
vcep_humu_40_1557_s001
|
| PS4 | Not assessed | No case-control study or quantitative enrichment data showing a significant excess of this variant in affected individuals was identified, so PS4 was not assessed. |
cspec
clinvar
vcep_humu_40_1557_s001
vcep_supplementarytables_v1_2_2024_11_18
|
| PM1 | N/A | The ENIGMA BRCA2 specification marks PM1 as not applicable, so this criterion was not applied. |
cspec
|
| PM2 | Not met | This variant is not absent from controls because it is present in gnomAD v4.1 at 3/1,614,118 alleles (AF 1.8586e-06; grpmax FAF 6.8e-07), so available population data do not support PM2. |
cspec
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| PM3 | Not assessed | No evidence was identified that this variant was observed in trans with another BRCA2 variant in a phenotype consistent with BRCA2-related Fanconi anemia, so PM3 was not assessed. |
cspec
vcep_specifications_v1_2_2024_11_18
|
| PM4 | N/A | The ENIGMA BRCA2 specification marks PM4 as not applicable, so this criterion was not applied. |
cspec
|
| PM5 | N/A | In the ENIGMA BRCA2 framework, PM5 is repurposed for truncating or protein-termination-codon logic rather than classic same-residue missense comparison, and this synonymous variant does not meet that use case. |
cspec
pm5_candidates
|
| PM6 | N/A | The ENIGMA BRCA2 specification marks assumed de novo evidence as not applicable, so PM6 was not applied. |
cspec
|
| PP1 | Not assessed | No quantitative co-segregation data for this variant were identified, so PP1 was not assessed. |
cspec
vcep_humu_40_1557_s001
vcep_supplementarytables_v1_2_2024_11_18
|
| PP2 | N/A | The ENIGMA BRCA2 specification marks PP2 as not applicable, so this criterion was not applied. |
cspec
|
| PP3 | Not met | SpliceAI predicts no meaningful splice effect for this synonymous variant (max delta score 0.00), which is below the ENIGMA BRCA2 PP3 splice threshold of 0.2, so PP3 is not met. |
cspec
spliceai
|
| PP4 | Not assessed | No exact match for this variant was identified in the BRCA2 clinical-history likelihood-ratio table, so there is no quantitative multifactorial clinical-history evidence to support PP4 at this time. |
cspec
vcep_pmid_31853058_brca2_clinical_history_lr
PMID:31853058
|
| PP5 | N/A | The ENIGMA BRCA2 specification marks PP5 as not applicable, so this criterion was not applied. |
cspec
|
| BA1 | Not met | The observed gnomAD v4.1 grpmax FAF is 6.8e-07, which is well below the ENIGMA BRCA2 BA1 threshold of greater than 0.001, so BA1 is not met. |
cspec
gnomad_v4
|
| BS1 | Not met | The observed gnomAD v4.1 grpmax FAF is 6.8e-07, which is below both the ENIGMA BRCA2 BS1 Supporting threshold of greater than 0.00002 and the Strong threshold of greater than 0.0001, so BS1 is not met. |
cspec
gnomad_v4
|
| BS2 | Not assessed | No evidence was identified that this variant was observed under the ENIGMA BRCA2 unaffected or non-Fanconi-anemia conditions required for BS2 point assignment, so BS2 was not assessed. |
cspec
vcep_specifications_v1_2_2024_11_18
|
| BS3 | Not assessed | No calibrated BRCA2 functional or RNA assay demonstrating no damaging effect for this exact variant was identified, so BS3 was not assessed. |
cspec
vcep_specifications_table9_v1_2_2024_11_18
vcep_humu_40_1557_s001
|
| BS4 | Not assessed | No quantitative non-segregation data for this variant were identified, so BS4 was not assessed. |
cspec
vcep_humu_40_1557_s001
vcep_supplementarytables_v1_2_2024_11_18
|
| BP1 | Met | This is a synonymous BRCA2 variant outside the ENIGMA-defined clinically important domains, and SpliceAI predicts no splice effect (max delta score 0.00, below the <=0.1 threshold), which meets BP1_Strong. |
cspec
vcep_specifications_v1_2_2024_11_18
spliceai
|
| BP2 | N/A | The ENIGMA BRCA2 specification marks BP2 as not applicable, so this criterion was not applied. |
cspec
|
| BP3 | N/A | The ENIGMA BRCA2 specification marks BP3 as not applicable, so this criterion was not applied. |
cspec
|
| BP4 | Not met | SpliceAI predicts no splice effect (max delta score 0.00), but the ENIGMA BRCA2 BP4 rule for silent variants is limited to synonymous variants inside clinically important domains; this variant is at codon 753, outside those domains, so BP4 is not met. |
cspec
vcep_specifications_v1_2_2024_11_18
spliceai
|
| BP5 | Not assessed | No exact match for this variant was identified in the BRCA2 clinical-history likelihood-ratio table, so there is no quantitative multifactorial clinical-history evidence to support BP5 at this time. |
cspec
vcep_pmid_31853058_brca2_clinical_history_lr
PMID:31853058
|
| BP6 | N/A | The ENIGMA BRCA2 specification marks BP6 as not applicable, so this criterion was not applied. |
cspec
|
| BP7 | Not assessed | SpliceAI predicts no splice effect (max delta score 0.00), but no variant-specific RNA study showing normal transcript processing was identified, and this outside-domain synonymous variant does not meet the ENIGMA BP7 supporting rule that is limited to silent variants inside clinically important domains with BP4 met. BP7 was therefore not assessed. |
cspec
vcep_specifications_v1_2_2024_11_18
spliceai
vcep_specifications_table9_v1_2_2024_11_18
|
Disclaimer:
The content and results provided by LYFE Sciences are for research and educational purposes only and must not be used as a substitute for professional medical judgment, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making any clinical decisions.