LYFE Sciences · Project HERA
Variant Interpretation · Classification Report
Generated: 2026-05-10
Case ID: NM_000059.4_c.2259T_C_20260510_014350
Framework: ACMG/AMP 2015 with ENIGMA Table 3 adaptations
Variant classification summary

NM_000059.4:c.2259T>C

BRCA2  · NP_000050.3:p.(Phe753=)  · NM_000059.4
GRCh37: chr13:32910751 T>C  ·  GRCh38: chr13:32336614 T>C
Gene: BRCA2 Transcript: NM_000059.4
Final call
BP1_Strong
All criteria require review: For research and educational purposes only.
Gene
BRCA2
Transcript
NM_000059.4
Protein
NP_000050.3:p.(Phe753=)
gnomAD AF
ClinVar
OncoKB
Unknown Oncogenic Effect
Interpretation summary
Generated evidence synthesis
1
The BRCA2 c.2259T>C (p.Phe753=) variant has been reported in ClinVar with only likely benign submissions.
2
This variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and present in gnomAD v4.1 at 3/1614118 alleles (AF 1.8586e-06; grpmax FAF 6.8e-07), which is far below ENIGMA BRCA2 BA1 and BS1 thresholds but does not satisfy absence from controls for PM2.
3
SpliceAI predicts no meaningful splice effect for this synonymous change (max delta score 0.00), and codon 753 lies outside the ENIGMA-defined BRCA2 clinically important domains, supporting BP1_Strong and not supporting PP3 or PVS1.
Final determination: BP1_Strong is present as a single strong benign criterion, but this alone does not satisfy the ENIGMA Table 3 thresholds for likely benign or benign classification; the variant is therefore classified as of uncertain significance.
ACMG/AMP criteria review
Criteria shown when status is available
All criteria require review: For research and educational purposes only.
Criterion Status Rationale Evidence used
PVS1 Not met This synonymous variant does not fall within the BRCA2 null-variant or canonical splice-site categories used for PVS1, and SpliceAI predicts no splice disruption (max delta score 0.00), so available evidence does not support a loss-of-function effect for this criterion.
cspec pvs1_gene_context pvs1_variant_assessment spliceai
PS1 Not assessed No evidence was identified that this variant produces the same proven pathogenic protein or splice consequence as a previously classified pathogenic or likely pathogenic BRCA2 variant, so PS1 was not assessed.
cspec vcep_specifications_v1_2_2024_11_18
PS2 N/A The ENIGMA BRCA2 specification marks de novo evidence as not applicable for this gene framework, so PS2 was not applied.
cspec
PS3 Not assessed No calibrated BRCA2 functional assay result for this exact variant was identified in the reviewed BRCA2 functional datasets, so PS3 was not assessed.
cspec vcep_specifications_table9_v1_2_2024_11_18 vcep_humu_40_1557_s001
PS4 Not assessed No case-control study or quantitative enrichment data showing a significant excess of this variant in affected individuals was identified, so PS4 was not assessed.
cspec clinvar vcep_humu_40_1557_s001 vcep_supplementarytables_v1_2_2024_11_18
PM1 N/A The ENIGMA BRCA2 specification marks PM1 as not applicable, so this criterion was not applied.
cspec
PM2 Not met This variant is not absent from controls because it is present in gnomAD v4.1 at 3/1,614,118 alleles (AF 1.8586e-06; grpmax FAF 6.8e-07), so available population data do not support PM2.
cspec gnomad_v2 gnomad_v4
PM3 Not assessed No evidence was identified that this variant was observed in trans with another BRCA2 variant in a phenotype consistent with BRCA2-related Fanconi anemia, so PM3 was not assessed.
cspec vcep_specifications_v1_2_2024_11_18
PM4 N/A The ENIGMA BRCA2 specification marks PM4 as not applicable, so this criterion was not applied.
cspec
PM5 N/A In the ENIGMA BRCA2 framework, PM5 is repurposed for truncating or protein-termination-codon logic rather than classic same-residue missense comparison, and this synonymous variant does not meet that use case.
cspec pm5_candidates
PM6 N/A The ENIGMA BRCA2 specification marks assumed de novo evidence as not applicable, so PM6 was not applied.
cspec
PP1 Not assessed No quantitative co-segregation data for this variant were identified, so PP1 was not assessed.
cspec vcep_humu_40_1557_s001 vcep_supplementarytables_v1_2_2024_11_18
PP2 N/A The ENIGMA BRCA2 specification marks PP2 as not applicable, so this criterion was not applied.
cspec
PP3 Not met SpliceAI predicts no meaningful splice effect for this synonymous variant (max delta score 0.00), which is below the ENIGMA BRCA2 PP3 splice threshold of 0.2, so PP3 is not met.
cspec spliceai
PP4 Not assessed No exact match for this variant was identified in the BRCA2 clinical-history likelihood-ratio table, so there is no quantitative multifactorial clinical-history evidence to support PP4 at this time.
cspec vcep_pmid_31853058_brca2_clinical_history_lr PMID:31853058
PP5 N/A The ENIGMA BRCA2 specification marks PP5 as not applicable, so this criterion was not applied.
cspec
BA1 Not met The observed gnomAD v4.1 grpmax FAF is 6.8e-07, which is well below the ENIGMA BRCA2 BA1 threshold of greater than 0.001, so BA1 is not met.
cspec gnomad_v4
BS1 Not met The observed gnomAD v4.1 grpmax FAF is 6.8e-07, which is below both the ENIGMA BRCA2 BS1 Supporting threshold of greater than 0.00002 and the Strong threshold of greater than 0.0001, so BS1 is not met.
cspec gnomad_v4
BS2 Not assessed No evidence was identified that this variant was observed under the ENIGMA BRCA2 unaffected or non-Fanconi-anemia conditions required for BS2 point assignment, so BS2 was not assessed.
cspec vcep_specifications_v1_2_2024_11_18
BS3 Not assessed No calibrated BRCA2 functional or RNA assay demonstrating no damaging effect for this exact variant was identified, so BS3 was not assessed.
cspec vcep_specifications_table9_v1_2_2024_11_18 vcep_humu_40_1557_s001
BS4 Not assessed No quantitative non-segregation data for this variant were identified, so BS4 was not assessed.
cspec vcep_humu_40_1557_s001 vcep_supplementarytables_v1_2_2024_11_18
BP1 Met This is a synonymous BRCA2 variant outside the ENIGMA-defined clinically important domains, and SpliceAI predicts no splice effect (max delta score 0.00, below the <=0.1 threshold), which meets BP1_Strong.
cspec vcep_specifications_v1_2_2024_11_18 spliceai
BP2 N/A The ENIGMA BRCA2 specification marks BP2 as not applicable, so this criterion was not applied.
cspec
BP3 N/A The ENIGMA BRCA2 specification marks BP3 as not applicable, so this criterion was not applied.
cspec
BP4 Not met SpliceAI predicts no splice effect (max delta score 0.00), but the ENIGMA BRCA2 BP4 rule for silent variants is limited to synonymous variants inside clinically important domains; this variant is at codon 753, outside those domains, so BP4 is not met.
cspec vcep_specifications_v1_2_2024_11_18 spliceai
BP5 Not assessed No exact match for this variant was identified in the BRCA2 clinical-history likelihood-ratio table, so there is no quantitative multifactorial clinical-history evidence to support BP5 at this time.
cspec vcep_pmid_31853058_brca2_clinical_history_lr PMID:31853058
BP6 N/A The ENIGMA BRCA2 specification marks BP6 as not applicable, so this criterion was not applied.
cspec
BP7 Not assessed SpliceAI predicts no splice effect (max delta score 0.00), but no variant-specific RNA study showing normal transcript processing was identified, and this outside-domain synonymous variant does not meet the ENIGMA BP7 supporting rule that is limited to silent variants inside clinically important domains with BP4 met. BP7 was therefore not assessed.
cspec vcep_specifications_v1_2_2024_11_18 spliceai vcep_specifications_table9_v1_2_2024_11_18
Disclaimer: The content and results provided by LYFE Sciences are for research and educational purposes only and must not be used as a substitute for professional medical judgment, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making any clinical decisions.