LYFE Sciences · Project HERA
Variant Interpretation · Classification Report
Variant classification summary
NM_000267.3:c.369C>G
NF1
· NP_000258.1:p.(Thr123=)
· NM_000267.3
GRCh37: chr17:29490284 C>G
·
GRCh38: chr17:31163266 C>G
Gene:
NF1
Transcript:
NM_000267.3
Final call
Likely Benign
BS1 strong benign
BP7 supporting benign
Variant details
Gene
NF1
Transcript
NM_000267.3
Protein
NP_000258.1:p.(Thr123=)
gnomAD AF
ClinVar
OncoKB
Unknown Oncogenic Effect
Classification rationale
Interpretation summary
Generated evidence synthesis
1
The NF1 c.369C>G (p.Thr123=) variant has been reported in ClinVar, where benign and likely benign classifications predominate.
2
This variant is present in population databases at high frequency, including East Asian allele frequencies of 1.11791% in gnomAD v2.1 and 1.22098% in gnomAD v4.1, supporting BS1 and arguing against rarity-based pathogenic criteria.
3
This synonymous variant is predicted to have no significant splice impact by SpliceAI, with a maximum delta score of 0.00, supporting BP7 and not supporting PP3.
Final determination:
Generic ACMG/AMP 2015 fallback rules support a Likely Benign classification because either one strong benign criterion plus one supporting benign criterion, or at least two supporting benign criteria, are present.
Criteria assessment
ACMG/AMP criteria review
Criteria shown when status is available
All criteria require review: For research and educational purposes only.
| Criterion | Status | Rationale | Evidence used |
|---|---|---|---|
| PVS1 | N/A | Generic PVS1 is not applicable because NF1 loss of function is an established disease mechanism, but this variant is a synonymous substitution, is not a canonical +/-1 or 2 splice-site change, and does not fall into a default null-variant PVS1 category. |
pvs1_gene_context
pvs1_variant_assessment
|
| PS1 | N/A | PS1 was not applicable because this is a synonymous change and no evidence was identified showing that it creates the same amino acid substitution as an established pathogenic variant. |
|
| PS2 | Not assessed | No confirmed de novo occurrence with verified maternity and paternity was identified for this variant. |
|
| PS3 | Not assessed | No well-established functional study was identified showing a damaging effect of this variant on NF1 function or splicing. |
|
| PS4 | Not met | Available evidence does not show enrichment of this variant in affected individuals. Instead, the variant is common in gnomAD, including East Asian frequencies above 1%, which argues against disease-specific case enrichment. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
clinvar
|
| PM1 | Not met | No evidence identified this site as a mutational hotspot or a well-established critical functional region without benign variation. Cancer Hotspots did not identify a significant hotspot at this residue. |
hotspots
|
| PM2 | Not met | Population frequency is well above rarity thresholds for PM2. In gnomAD, the East Asian allele frequency is 1.11791% in v2.1 and 1.22098% in v4.1, so this variant is not absent or rare in population databases. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| PM3 | N/A | PM3 was not applicable because no recessive observation data were identified for this NF1 variant. |
|
| PM4 | N/A | PM4 was not applicable because this variant does not change protein length and is not an in-frame insertion or deletion or stop-loss variant. |
|
| PM5 | N/A | PM5 was not applicable because this is not a missense change and same-residue missense comparator logic could not be applied. |
pm5_candidates
|
| PM6 | Not assessed | No assumed de novo occurrence without full parentage confirmation was identified for this variant. |
|
| PP1 | Not assessed | No segregation data were identified for this variant. |
|
| PP2 | N/A | PP2 was not applicable because this is not a missense variant. |
|
| PP3 | Not met | Available computational evidence does not support a deleterious effect. SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact with a maximum delta score of 0.00. |
spliceai
|
| PP4 | Not assessed | No phenotype-specific evidence was identified linking this exact variant to a highly specific NF1 clinical presentation. |
|
| PP5 | Not assessed | PP5 was not used because current interpretation relies on primary evidence rather than external assertions alone. |
|
| BA1 | Not assessed | The variant is common in population databases, but no explicit NF1 CSPEC population stand-alone benign threshold was available in the reviewed materials for direct BA1 assignment in this pass. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
cspec
final_classification_framework
|
| BS1 | Met | Population frequency is above a benign-supporting threshold. In gnomAD, the East Asian allele frequency is 1.11791% in v2.1 and 1.22098% in v4.1, which is well above 0.3%, supporting that this variant is too common for a pathogenic NF1 variant. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| BS2 | Not assessed | Population observations alone were not treated as confirmed observations in well-phenotyped unaffected individuals for BS2 in this pass. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| BS3 | Not assessed | No well-established functional study was identified showing that this variant has no damaging effect on splicing or NF1 function. |
|
| BS4 | Not assessed | No non-segregation data were identified for this variant. |
|
| BP1 | N/A | BP1 was not applicable because this is not a missense variant. |
|
| BP2 | Not assessed | No phased observation data with another pathogenic variant were identified for this variant. |
|
| BP3 | N/A | BP3 was not applicable because this variant is not an in-frame insertion or deletion in a repetitive region. |
|
| BP4 | N/A | BP4 was not separately applied because this synonymous variant is more appropriately considered under BP7 for silent changes with no predicted splice impact. |
spliceai
|
| BP5 | Not assessed | No alternate molecular explanation was identified for any reported phenotype associated with this exact variant. |
|
| BP6 | Not assessed | BP6 was not used because current interpretation relies on primary evidence rather than external assertions alone. |
|
| BP7 | Met | This is a synonymous variant, it is not a canonical splice-site change, and SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact with a maximum delta score of 0.00, supporting no expected effect on RNA splicing. |
spliceai
pvs1_variant_assessment
|
Disclaimer:
The content and results provided by LYFE Sciences are for research and educational purposes only and must not be used as a substitute for professional medical judgment, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making any clinical decisions.