LYFE Sciences · Project HERA
Variant Interpretation · Classification Report
Variant classification summary
NM_198253.2:c.835G>A
TERT
· NP_937983.2:p.(Ala279Thr)
· NM_198253.2
GRCh37: chr5:1294166 C>T
·
GRCh38: chr5:1294051 C>T
Gene:
TERT
Transcript:
NM_198253.2
Final call
Benign
BA1 stand-alone benign
BS1 strong benign
BP4 supporting benign
Variant details
Gene
TERT
Transcript
NM_198253.2
Protein
NP_937983.2:p.(Ala279Thr)
gnomAD AF
ClinVar
OncoKB
Unknown Oncogenic Effect
Classification rationale
Interpretation summary
Generated evidence synthesis
1
The TERT c.835G>A (p.Ala279Thr, p.A279T) variant has been reported in ClinVar as benign by 18 clinical laboratories.
2
This variant is common in population databases, with a total allele frequency of 2.314% in gnomAD v2.1 and 2.712% in gnomAD v4.1; the highest observed population frequency is 5.889% in Finnish individuals in v2.1 and 5.675% in Finnish individuals in v4.1.
3
In silico results do not support a damaging effect: SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact with a maximum delta score of 0.00, REVEL is 0.162, and BayesDel is -0.293678.
Final determination:
Generic ACMG/AMP 2015 fallback rules support a Benign classification because either BA1 is met or at least two strong benign criteria are present.
Criteria assessment
ACMG/AMP criteria review
Criteria shown when status is available
All criteria require review: For research and educational purposes only.
| Criterion | Status | Rationale | Evidence used |
|---|---|---|---|
| PVS1 | N/A | This variant is a missense substitution, p.(Ala279Thr), and does not fall into the generic PVS1 null-variant categories of nonsense, frameshift, or canonical +/-1,2 splice variants. Although loss of function is an established disease mechanism for TERT, the available generic PVS1 assessment does not support applying PVS1 to this variant. |
pvs1_gene_context
pvs1_variant_assessment
pvs1_generic_framework
|
| PS1 | Not assessed | No evidence was identified showing that another nucleotide change creates the same amino acid substitution with an established pathogenic classification, so PS1 was not assessed. |
|
| PS2 | Not assessed | No confirmed de novo occurrence with parental testing was identified for this variant, so PS2 was not assessed. |
clinvar
|
| PS3 | Not assessed | No well-established functional study for this exact variant was identified that demonstrates a damaging effect, so PS3 was not assessed. |
oncokb
|
| PS4 | Not met | Available evidence does not show enrichment of this variant in affected individuals compared with controls. This variant is common in population databases, with gnomAD total allele frequencies of 2.314% in v2.1 and 2.712% in v4.1, which argues against PS4. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
clinvar
|
| PM1 | Not met | This variant has not been shown to lie in a well-established mutational hotspot or critical functional domain without benign variation. Cancer Hotspots did not identify a statistically significant hotspot at residue A279. |
hotspots
|
| PM2 | Not met | This variant is not absent or rare in population databases. Its allele frequency is 2.314% in gnomAD v2.1 and 2.712% in gnomAD v4.1, which is far above the usual PM2 rarity threshold of 0.1%. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| PM3 | Not assessed | No evidence was identified regarding occurrence of this variant in trans with a pathogenic variant in a recessive disease context, so PM3 was not assessed. |
|
| PM4 | N/A | This variant is a missense substitution and does not cause a protein length change from an in-frame insertion/deletion or stop-loss event, so PM4 is not applicable. |
|
| PM5 | N/A | The available review could not confirm that classic same-residue PM5 logic should be applied for this gene/framework, and no validated same-residue pathogenic comparator was established. PM5 was therefore not applied. |
pm5_candidates
|
| PM6 | Not assessed | No probable de novo occurrence without full parental confirmation was identified for this variant, so PM6 was not assessed. |
clinvar
|
| PP1 | Not assessed | No segregation data were identified for this variant, so PP1 was not assessed. |
clinvar
|
| PP2 | Not assessed | No gene-specific evidence was identified showing that TERT is a gene in which pathogenic missense variation is the predominant disease mechanism with a low rate of benign missense variation, so PP2 was not assessed. |
|
| PP3 | Not met | Available computational evidence does not support a damaging effect. SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact with a maximum delta score of 0.00, REVEL is 0.162, and BayesDel is -0.293678, which together do not support PP3. |
spliceai
revel
bayesdel
|
| PP4 | Not assessed | No phenotype data specific enough to show that the individual's presentation is highly specific for a TERT-related disorder were identified, so PP4 was not assessed. |
|
| PP5 | Not assessed | PP5 was not used because no qualifying reputable-source pathogenic assertion independent of the underlying evidence review was identified. |
clinvar
|
| BA1 | Met | Population frequency is above the benign stand-alone threshold. This variant is present at 2.314% in gnomAD v2.1 and 2.712% in gnomAD v4.1, both above the 1% BA1 threshold. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| BS1 | Met | Population frequency is greater than expected for a pathogenic TERT variant. The allele frequency is 2.314% in gnomAD v2.1 and 2.712% in gnomAD v4.1, both above the 0.3% BS1 threshold. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| BS2 | Not met | Although this variant is observed in many population samples, including homozygotes in gnomAD, the available data do not establish that these are well-phenotyped unaffected adults for a fully penetrant TERT-related disorder. BS2 was therefore not applied. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| BS3 | Not assessed | No well-established functional study for this exact variant was identified showing normal or near-normal function, so BS3 was not assessed. |
oncokb
|
| BS4 | Not assessed | No non-segregation data were identified for this variant, so BS4 was not assessed. |
clinvar
|
| BP1 | Not met | This is a missense variant, but the available evidence does not show that missense variation in TERT is uniformly less likely to be pathogenic than truncating variation, so BP1 was not met. |
pvs1_gene_context
|
| BP2 | Not assessed | No phase information or co-occurrence data with another pathogenic variant were identified, so BP2 was not assessed. |
|
| BP3 | N/A | This criterion applies to in-frame insertions/deletions in repetitive regions and is not applicable to this missense substitution. |
|
| BP4 | Met | Multiple computational predictors support no damaging effect. SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact with a maximum delta score of 0.00, REVEL is 0.162, and BayesDel is -0.293678, which together support BP4. |
spliceai
revel
bayesdel
|
| BP5 | Not assessed | No evidence was identified for an alternate molecular cause that fully explains the phenotype, so BP5 was not assessed. |
|
| BP6 | Not assessed | BP6 was not used because no qualifying reputable-source benign assertion independent of the underlying evidence review was established for this pass. |
clinvar
|
| BP7 | N/A | This criterion applies to synonymous or certain intronic variants without predicted splice impact and is not applicable to this missense substitution. |
|
Disclaimer:
The content and results provided by LYFE Sciences are for research and educational purposes only and must not be used as a substitute for professional medical judgment, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making any clinical decisions.