LYFE Sciences · Project HERA
Variant Interpretation · Classification Report
Variant classification summary
NM_005089.3:c.617T>C
ZRSR2
· NP_005080.1:p.(Phe206Ser)
· NM_005089.3
GRCh37: chrX:15833859 T>C
·
GRCh38: chrX:15815736 T>C
Gene:
ZRSR2
Transcript:
NM_005089.3
Final call
VUS
PM2 supporting
Variant details
Gene
ZRSR2
Transcript
NM_005089.3
Protein
NP_005080.1:p.(Phe206Ser)
gnomAD AF
ClinVar
OncoKB
Unknown Oncogenic Effect
Classification rationale
Interpretation summary
Generated evidence synthesis
1
The ZRSR2 c.617T>C (p.Phe206Ser; p.F206S) variant has not been reported in ClinVar and does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot.
2
This variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and gnomAD v4.1, corresponding to an observed population frequency of 0%, which is below the 0.1% PM2 threshold.
3
Available curated review did not identify variant-specific reviewed functional evidence for this variant.
4
In silico evidence is mixed: BayesDel is positive at 0.563308, while SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact with a maximum delta score of 0.09, so computational findings do not currently support PP3 or BP4.
Final determination:
Generic ACMG/AMP 2015 fallback rules do not meet benign, likely benign, likely pathogenic, or pathogenic combination thresholds, so the variant is classified as Variant of Uncertain Significance.
Criteria assessment
ACMG/AMP criteria review
Criteria shown when status is available
All criteria require review: For research and educational purposes only.
| Criterion | Status | Rationale | Evidence used |
|---|---|---|---|
| PVS1 | N/A | This variant is a missense substitution, p.(Phe206Ser), and does not fall into the generic PVS1 null-variant categories of nonsense, frameshift, or canonical ±1,2 splice variants. Although germline loss of function is a supported disease mechanism for ZRSR2, available evidence does not support applying PVS1 to this specific variant. |
pvs1_gene_context
pvs1_variant_assessment
pvs1_generic_framework
|
| PS1 | Not assessed | No established pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant causing the same amino acid change was identified, so PS1 was not assessed. |
clinvar
|
| PS2 | Not assessed | No confirmed de novo occurrence with parental confirmation was identified for this variant, so PS2 was not assessed. |
clinvar
|
| PS3 | Not assessed | No well-established functional study demonstrating a damaging effect of this specific variant was identified, so PS3 was not assessed. |
oncokb
|
| PS4 | Not met | No enrichment of this variant in affected individuals was identified, and no unrelated case series or case-control data were found to support increased prevalence in affected individuals over controls. |
clinvar
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| PM1 | Not met | Available evidence does not support that residue 206 lies in a statistically significant hotspot or a well-established critical functional region without benign variation. Cancer Hotspots did not identify a statistically significant hotspot at this position. |
hotspots
|
| PM2 | Met | This variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and gnomAD v4.1, corresponding to an observed population frequency of 0%, which is below the non-VCEP PM2 threshold of 0.1%. This supports rarity in the general population. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| PM3 | Not assessed | No data were identified showing this variant in trans with a pathogenic variant in an affected individual, so PM3 was not assessed. |
|
| PM4 | N/A | This variant is a missense substitution and does not cause a protein length change, so PM4 is not applicable. |
|
| PM5 | N/A | PM5 was not applied because no qualified same-residue pathogenic comparator was identified, and available review materials could not safely confirm classic same-residue PM5 semantics for this case. |
pm5_candidates
|
| PM6 | Not assessed | No assumed de novo occurrence without parental confirmation was identified for this variant, so PM6 was not assessed. |
clinvar
|
| PP1 | Not assessed | No segregation data were identified for this variant, so PP1 was not assessed. |
clinvar
|
| PP2 | Not assessed | Available evidence does not establish that missense variation is a common disease mechanism for ZRSR2, so PP2 was not assessed. |
pvs1_gene_context
|
| PP3 | Not met | Computational evidence is insufficiently consistent to support PP3. BayesDel predicts a deleterious effect with a score of 0.563308, but SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact with a maximum delta score of 0.09, and no REVEL score was available. |
bayesdel
spliceai
|
| PP4 | Not assessed | No phenotype-specific clinical evidence was provided to show a presentation highly specific for a ZRSR2-related disorder, so PP4 was not assessed. |
|
| PP5 | Not assessed | No reputable-source pathogenic classification without accessible supporting evidence was identified, so PP5 was not assessed. |
clinvar
|
| BA1 | Not met | This variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and gnomAD v4.1, corresponding to an observed population frequency of 0%, which is below the BA1 threshold of 1%. BA1 is not met. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| BS1 | Not met | This variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and gnomAD v4.1, corresponding to an observed population frequency of 0%, which is below the BS1 threshold of 0.3%. BS1 is not met. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| BS2 | Not met | This variant has not been observed in population databases, so occurrence in healthy individuals does not support BS2. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| BS3 | Not assessed | No well-established functional study showing normal function for this specific variant was identified, so BS3 was not assessed. |
oncokb
|
| BS4 | Not assessed | No non-segregation data were identified for this variant, so BS4 was not assessed. |
clinvar
|
| BP1 | Not assessed | Available evidence does not sufficiently establish that missense variants in ZRSR2 are generally less likely to be disease-causing than truncating variants, so BP1 was not assessed. |
pvs1_gene_context
|
| BP2 | Not assessed | No phase data were identified showing this variant in trans with a pathogenic variant for a dominant disorder or in cis with a pathogenic variant, so BP2 was not assessed. |
|
| BP3 | N/A | This variant is not an in-frame deletion or insertion within a repetitive region, so BP3 is not applicable. |
|
| BP4 | Not met | Computational evidence does not support BP4. SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact with a maximum delta score of 0.09, but BayesDel is positive at 0.563308 for a deleterious missense effect, so the available in silico evidence is not uniformly benign. |
spliceai
bayesdel
|
| BP5 | Not assessed | No evidence was identified showing that an alternate molecular cause fully explains the observed phenotype, so BP5 was not assessed. |
|
| BP6 | Not assessed | No reputable-source benign classification without accessible supporting evidence was identified, so BP6 was not assessed. |
clinvar
|
| BP7 | N/A | This variant is a missense substitution rather than a synonymous or intronic variant, so BP7 is not applicable. |
|
Disclaimer:
The content and results provided by LYFE Sciences are for research and educational purposes only and must not be used as a substitute for professional medical judgment, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making any clinical decisions.