LYFE Sciences · Project HERA
Variant Interpretation · Classification Report
Variant classification summary
NM_000244.3:c.1311G>A
MEN1
· NP_000235.2:p.(Leu437=)
· NM_000244.3
GRCh37: chr11:64572560 C>T
·
GRCh38: chr11:64805088 C>T
Gene:
MEN1
Transcript:
NM_000244.3
Final call
Likely Benign
BS1 strong benign
BP7 supporting benign
Variant details
Gene
MEN1
Transcript
NM_000244.3
Protein
NP_000235.2:p.(Leu437=)
gnomAD AF
0.0014502899340833623 (v4.1)
ClinVar
Likely benign
OncoKB
Unknown Oncogenic Effect
Classification rationale
Interpretation summary
Generated evidence synthesis
1
The MEN1 NM_000244.3:c.1311G>A (NP_000235.2:p.(Leu437=); NP_000235.2:p.(L437=)) variant has been reported in ClinVar predominantly as likely benign or benign, with 10 likely benign, 7 benign, and 1 uncertain significance submissions.
2
This variant is present in gnomAD at 0.11182% in v2.1 and 0.14503% in v4.1, with a highest observed population frequency of 0.65789% in Amish individuals in v4.1, which is above the 0.3% BS1 threshold and argues against a rare pathogenic MEN1 variant.
3
SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this synonymous change, with a maximum delta score of 0.08, supporting a benign computational interpretation.
Final determination:
Generic ACMG/AMP 2015 fallback rules support a Likely Benign classification because either one strong benign criterion plus one supporting benign criterion, or at least two supporting benign criteria, are present.
Criteria assessment
ACMG/AMP criteria review
Criteria shown when status is available
All criteria require review: For research and educational purposes only.
| Criterion | Status | Rationale | Evidence used |
|---|---|---|---|
| PVS1 | N/A | This is a synonymous variant, and the generic PVS1 review did not place it in a null-variant category eligible for PVS1. Available evidence does not show that this change creates a canonical splice-site alteration or another established loss-of-function effect. |
pvs1_gene_context
pvs1_variant_assessment
pvs1_generic_framework
|
| PS1 | N/A | PS1 is not applicable because this variant does not produce an amino acid substitution. |
|
| PS2 | Not assessed | No confirmed de novo occurrence with parental testing was identified. |
|
| PS3 | Not assessed | No well-established functional study showing a damaging effect of this exact variant was identified. |
|
| PS4 | Not met | Available evidence does not show enrichment of this variant in affected individuals versus controls. The variant is also present in population databases at frequencies not consistent with a rare pathogenic MEN1 variant. |
clinvar
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| PM1 | Not met | This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot, and no critical benign-variation-depleted region at this residue was identified from the available evidence. |
hotspots
|
| PM2 | Not met | Population frequency is above the PM2 threshold. The variant is present at 0.11182% in gnomAD v2.1 and 0.14503% in gnomAD v4.1, both above the non-VCEP PM2 threshold of 0.1%. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| PM3 | N/A | PM3 is not applicable because this criterion is used for recessive disorders with trans observations, and MEN1 is not being evaluated under a recessive framework here. |
|
| PM4 | N/A | PM4 is not applicable because this variant does not change protein length. |
|
| PM5 | N/A | PM5 is not applicable because this variant is not a missense change, and the PM5 candidate review did not support classic same-residue PM5 use for this variant. |
pm5_candidates
|
| PM6 | Not assessed | No apparent de novo occurrence without confirmed parentage was identified. |
|
| PP1 | Not assessed | No segregation data were identified for this exact variant. |
|
| PP2 | N/A | PP2 is not applicable because this variant is not a missense change. |
|
| PP3 | Not met | Available computational evidence does not support a damaging splicing effect. SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact, with a maximum delta score of 0.08. |
spliceai
|
| PP4 | Not assessed | No case-specific phenotype information was provided to determine whether the clinical presentation is highly specific for MEN1 caused by this variant. |
|
| PP5 | N/A | PP5 was not applied because a pathogenic assertion from an external source without independently reviewable evidence was not used for this interpretation. |
|
| BA1 | Not met | Population frequency does not reach the BA1 threshold. The highest observed population frequency in gnomAD v4.1 is 0.65789%, which is below the non-VCEP BA1 threshold of 1%. |
gnomad_v4
|
| BS1 | Met | Population frequency is above the BS1 threshold. This variant is present at 0.14503% overall in gnomAD v4.1, with a highest observed population frequency of 0.65789% in Amish individuals, which is above the non-VCEP BS1 threshold of 0.3%. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| BS2 | Not assessed | Population observations alone were not considered sufficient to establish this criterion for a dominant, age-related tumor predisposition condition. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| BS3 | Not assessed | No well-established functional study showing a benign effect of this exact variant was identified. |
|
| BS4 | Not assessed | No nonsegregation data were identified for this exact variant. |
|
| BP1 | N/A | BP1 is not applicable because this variant is not a missense change. |
|
| BP2 | Not assessed | No phase data or co-occurrence data were identified. |
|
| BP3 | Not assessed | No evidence was identified that this variant lies in a repetitive region without a known function. |
|
| BP4 | N/A | BP4 was not separately applied because this is a synonymous variant and BP7 is the more specific benign computational criterion for this context. |
spliceai
|
| BP5 | Not assessed | No evidence was identified for an alternate molecular cause explaining the phenotype. |
|
| BP6 | N/A | BP6 was not applied because benign assertions from external databases were not used as a standalone criterion without independent evidence review. |
|
| BP7 | Met | This is a synonymous variant, and available computational evidence predicts no meaningful splice effect. SpliceAI shows a maximum delta score of 0.08, supporting no significant impact on RNA splicing. |
spliceai
|
Disclaimer:
The content and results provided by LYFE Sciences are for research and educational purposes only and must not be used as a substitute for professional medical judgment, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making any clinical decisions.