LYFE Sciences · Project HERA
Variant Interpretation · Classification Report
Generated: 2026-05-14
Case ID: NM_001127208.2_c.5456T_G_20260514_194320
Framework: ACMG/AMP 2015
Variant classification summary

NM_001127208.2:c.5456T>G

TET2  · NP_001120680.1:p.(Leu1819Ter)  · NM_001127208.2
GRCh37: chr4:106197123 T>G  ·  GRCh38: chr4:105275966 T>G
Gene: TET2 Transcript: NM_001127208.2
Final call
VUS
PM2 moderate
All criteria require review: For research and educational purposes only.
Gene
TET2
Transcript
NM_001127208.2
Protein
NP_001120680.1:p.(Leu1819Ter)
gnomAD AF
1.2889388424298044e-06 (v4.1)
ClinVar
OncoKB
Likely Oncogenic
Interpretation summary
Generated evidence synthesis
1
The TET2 c.5456T>G (p.Leu1819Ter) variant has not been reported in ClinVar, and curated oncology resources identify variant-specific literature context consistent with somatic relevance.
2
This variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and present in gnomAD v4.1 at 2/1,551,664 alleles (AF 0.00013%; highest population AF 0.00017%), which is below the 0.1% PM2 threshold and far below benign-frequency thresholds.
3
Published TET2 studies support the biological importance of TET2 loss of function, but no variant-specific functional assay for p.(Leu1819Ter) was identified.
4
This nonsense change occurs in the last exon, SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact (max delta score 0.00), REVEL was unavailable, and BayesDel score 0.288612 does not independently resolve pathogenicity for this variant.
Final determination: Generic ACMG/AMP 2015 fallback rules do not meet benign, likely benign, likely pathogenic, or pathogenic combination thresholds, so the variant is classified as Variant of Uncertain Significance.
ACMG/AMP criteria review
Criteria shown when status is available
All criteria require review: For research and educational purposes only.
Criterion Status Rationale Evidence used
PVS1 Not assessed Germline loss of function is supported as a disease mechanism for TET2, and this variant is a nonsense change. However, c.5456T>G (p.Leu1819Ter) lies in the last exon and is predicted to truncate the final 184 of 2003 amino acids (about 9.2%), so additional review is needed to determine whether loss of this distal C-terminal region is sufficient for a generic PVS1 strength assignment.
pvs1_gene_context pvs1_variant_assessment pvs1_generic_framework
PS1 Not assessed No previously established pathogenic variant causing the same amino acid change was identified in the reviewed sources.
clinvar
PS2 Not assessed No de novo occurrence data with confirmed maternity and paternity were identified for this variant.
clinvar
PS3 Not assessed Published studies and curated oncology resources support that loss of TET2 function is biologically relevant, but no variant-specific functional assay for p.(Leu1819Ter) was identified, so PS3 cannot be applied from the current evidence.
oncokb PMID:21057493 PMID:24315485
PS4 Not assessed No case-control data or clear enrichment of this exact variant in affected individuals were identified.
clinvar gnomad_v4
PM1 Not met Available hotspot review did not identify this variant in a statistically significant hotspot or other well-established critical region without benign variation.
hotspots
PM2 Met This variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and is present in gnomAD v4.1 at 2/1,551,664 alleles (AF 0.00013%; highest population AF 0.00017%; grpmax FAF 2.9e-07), which is below the 0.1% PM2 threshold.
gnomad_v2 gnomad_v4
PM3 N/A No recessive inheritance context or trans observations relevant to PM3 were identified for this variant.
PM4 N/A This is a nonsense variant rather than an in-frame length change, so PM4 is not the appropriate criterion.
pvs1_variant_assessment
PM5 N/A Classic same-residue PM5 logic could not be confirmed safely for this case, and no validated comparator variants were identified for application of PM5.
pm5_candidates
PM6 Not assessed No assumed de novo report for this variant was identified.
clinvar
PP1 Not assessed No segregation data in affected relatives were identified for this variant.
clinvar
PP2 N/A This criterion is intended for missense variation in genes with a low rate of benign missense variation and a common pathogenic missense mechanism. This variant is a nonsense change.
PP3 Not met Computational evidence does not independently support a damaging effect beyond the known stop-gain consequence. SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact (max delta score 0.00), REVEL was unavailable, and BayesDel score 0.288612 alone is not sufficient to apply PP3 for this nonsense variant.
spliceai bayesdel
PP4 Not assessed No patient-specific phenotype information was provided to assess whether the clinical presentation is highly specific for a TET2-related disorder.
PP5 Not assessed No pathogenic assertion from a reputable external clinical source was identified in the reviewed materials, and the variant is absent from ClinVar.
clinvar
BA1 Not met The observed population frequency does not meet the benign stand-alone threshold. In gnomAD v4.1 the total AF is 0.00013%, which is well below the 1.0% BA1 threshold.
gnomad_v4
BS1 Not met The observed population frequency does not meet the strong benign threshold. In gnomAD v4.1 the total AF is 0.00013%, which is well below the 0.3% BS1 threshold.
gnomad_v4
BS2 Not assessed No evidence was identified showing this variant in healthy adult individuals in a context sufficient to support BS2.
gnomad_v4
BS3 Not assessed No well-established functional study demonstrating a normal or benign effect for this exact variant was identified.
oncokb PMID:21057493 PMID:24315485
BS4 Not assessed No family data showing lack of segregation with disease were identified for this variant.
clinvar
BP1 N/A This criterion applies to missense variants in genes where truncating variants are the predominant pathogenic mechanism. This variant is a nonsense change.
BP2 Not assessed No cis/trans phase data with another variant were identified for this case.
BP3 Not assessed No evidence was identified that this variant lies in a repetitive region without known function.
BP4 Not met Computational evidence does not support a benign effect. SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact (max delta score 0.00), but REVEL was unavailable and BayesDel score 0.288612 does not provide benign support for this stop-gain variant.
spliceai bayesdel
BP5 Not assessed No alternate molecular explanation was identified that would account for the phenotype independently of this variant.
BP6 Not assessed No reputable benign classification for the exact variant was identified, and the variant is absent from ClinVar.
clinvar
BP7 N/A BP7 applies to synonymous or certain intronic variants with no predicted splice impact. This variant is a nonsense change.
spliceai
Disclaimer: The content and results provided by LYFE Sciences are for research and educational purposes only and must not be used as a substitute for professional medical judgment, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making any clinical decisions.