LYFE Sciences · Project HERA
Variant Interpretation · Classification Report
Variant classification summary
NM_001127208.2:c.5456T>G
TET2
· NP_001120680.1:p.(Leu1819Ter)
· NM_001127208.2
GRCh37: chr4:106197123 T>G
·
GRCh38: chr4:105275966 T>G
Gene:
TET2
Transcript:
NM_001127208.2
Final call
VUS
PM2 moderate
Variant details
Gene
TET2
Transcript
NM_001127208.2
Protein
NP_001120680.1:p.(Leu1819Ter)
gnomAD AF
1.2889388424298044e-06 (v4.1)
ClinVar
OncoKB
Likely Oncogenic
Classification rationale
Interpretation summary
Generated evidence synthesis
1
The TET2 c.5456T>G (p.Leu1819Ter) variant has not been reported in ClinVar, and curated oncology resources identify variant-specific literature context consistent with somatic relevance.
2
This variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and present in gnomAD v4.1 at 2/1,551,664 alleles (AF 0.00013%; highest population AF 0.00017%), which is below the 0.1% PM2 threshold and far below benign-frequency thresholds.
3
Published TET2 studies support the biological importance of TET2 loss of function, but no variant-specific functional assay for p.(Leu1819Ter) was identified.
4
This nonsense change occurs in the last exon, SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact (max delta score 0.00), REVEL was unavailable, and BayesDel score 0.288612 does not independently resolve pathogenicity for this variant.
Final determination:
Generic ACMG/AMP 2015 fallback rules do not meet benign, likely benign, likely pathogenic, or pathogenic combination thresholds, so the variant is classified as Variant of Uncertain Significance.
Criteria assessment
ACMG/AMP criteria review
Criteria shown when status is available
All criteria require review: For research and educational purposes only.
| Criterion | Status | Rationale | Evidence used |
|---|---|---|---|
| PVS1 | Not assessed | Germline loss of function is supported as a disease mechanism for TET2, and this variant is a nonsense change. However, c.5456T>G (p.Leu1819Ter) lies in the last exon and is predicted to truncate the final 184 of 2003 amino acids (about 9.2%), so additional review is needed to determine whether loss of this distal C-terminal region is sufficient for a generic PVS1 strength assignment. |
pvs1_gene_context
pvs1_variant_assessment
pvs1_generic_framework
|
| PS1 | Not assessed | No previously established pathogenic variant causing the same amino acid change was identified in the reviewed sources. |
clinvar
|
| PS2 | Not assessed | No de novo occurrence data with confirmed maternity and paternity were identified for this variant. |
clinvar
|
| PS3 | Not assessed | Published studies and curated oncology resources support that loss of TET2 function is biologically relevant, but no variant-specific functional assay for p.(Leu1819Ter) was identified, so PS3 cannot be applied from the current evidence. |
oncokb
PMID:21057493
PMID:24315485
|
| PS4 | Not assessed | No case-control data or clear enrichment of this exact variant in affected individuals were identified. |
clinvar
gnomad_v4
|
| PM1 | Not met | Available hotspot review did not identify this variant in a statistically significant hotspot or other well-established critical region without benign variation. |
hotspots
|
| PM2 | Met | This variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and is present in gnomAD v4.1 at 2/1,551,664 alleles (AF 0.00013%; highest population AF 0.00017%; grpmax FAF 2.9e-07), which is below the 0.1% PM2 threshold. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| PM3 | N/A | No recessive inheritance context or trans observations relevant to PM3 were identified for this variant. |
|
| PM4 | N/A | This is a nonsense variant rather than an in-frame length change, so PM4 is not the appropriate criterion. |
pvs1_variant_assessment
|
| PM5 | N/A | Classic same-residue PM5 logic could not be confirmed safely for this case, and no validated comparator variants were identified for application of PM5. |
pm5_candidates
|
| PM6 | Not assessed | No assumed de novo report for this variant was identified. |
clinvar
|
| PP1 | Not assessed | No segregation data in affected relatives were identified for this variant. |
clinvar
|
| PP2 | N/A | This criterion is intended for missense variation in genes with a low rate of benign missense variation and a common pathogenic missense mechanism. This variant is a nonsense change. |
|
| PP3 | Not met | Computational evidence does not independently support a damaging effect beyond the known stop-gain consequence. SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact (max delta score 0.00), REVEL was unavailable, and BayesDel score 0.288612 alone is not sufficient to apply PP3 for this nonsense variant. |
spliceai
bayesdel
|
| PP4 | Not assessed | No patient-specific phenotype information was provided to assess whether the clinical presentation is highly specific for a TET2-related disorder. |
|
| PP5 | Not assessed | No pathogenic assertion from a reputable external clinical source was identified in the reviewed materials, and the variant is absent from ClinVar. |
clinvar
|
| BA1 | Not met | The observed population frequency does not meet the benign stand-alone threshold. In gnomAD v4.1 the total AF is 0.00013%, which is well below the 1.0% BA1 threshold. |
gnomad_v4
|
| BS1 | Not met | The observed population frequency does not meet the strong benign threshold. In gnomAD v4.1 the total AF is 0.00013%, which is well below the 0.3% BS1 threshold. |
gnomad_v4
|
| BS2 | Not assessed | No evidence was identified showing this variant in healthy adult individuals in a context sufficient to support BS2. |
gnomad_v4
|
| BS3 | Not assessed | No well-established functional study demonstrating a normal or benign effect for this exact variant was identified. |
oncokb
PMID:21057493
PMID:24315485
|
| BS4 | Not assessed | No family data showing lack of segregation with disease were identified for this variant. |
clinvar
|
| BP1 | N/A | This criterion applies to missense variants in genes where truncating variants are the predominant pathogenic mechanism. This variant is a nonsense change. |
|
| BP2 | Not assessed | No cis/trans phase data with another variant were identified for this case. |
|
| BP3 | Not assessed | No evidence was identified that this variant lies in a repetitive region without known function. |
|
| BP4 | Not met | Computational evidence does not support a benign effect. SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact (max delta score 0.00), but REVEL was unavailable and BayesDel score 0.288612 does not provide benign support for this stop-gain variant. |
spliceai
bayesdel
|
| BP5 | Not assessed | No alternate molecular explanation was identified that would account for the phenotype independently of this variant. |
|
| BP6 | Not assessed | No reputable benign classification for the exact variant was identified, and the variant is absent from ClinVar. |
clinvar
|
| BP7 | N/A | BP7 applies to synonymous or certain intronic variants with no predicted splice impact. This variant is a nonsense change. |
spliceai
|
Disclaimer:
The content and results provided by LYFE Sciences are for research and educational purposes only and must not be used as a substitute for professional medical judgment, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making any clinical decisions.