LYFE Sciences · Project HERA
Variant Interpretation · Classification Report
Variant classification summary
NM_012433.4:c.1986C>A
SF3B1
· NP_036565.2:p.(His662Gln)
· NM_012433.4
GRCh37: chr2:198267371 G>T
·
GRCh38: chr2:197402647 G>T
Gene:
SF3B1
Transcript:
NM_012433.4
Final call
VUS
PM2 supporting
Variant details
Gene
SF3B1
Transcript
NM_012433.4
Protein
NP_036565.2:p.(His662Gln)
gnomAD AF
4.337389412060669e-06 (v4.1)
ClinVar
OncoKB
Likely Oncogenic
Classification rationale
Interpretation summary
Generated evidence synthesis
1
The SF3B1 c.1986C>A (p.His662Gln) variant has been observed in somatic cancer curation resources and has not been reported in ClinVar.
2
This variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and is present at very low frequency in gnomAD v4.1 (7/1613874 alleles; AF 4.33739e-06; highest population AF 3.12354e-05), which is below the 0.1% rarity threshold used for PM2.
3
Published studies showed that SF3B1 pathway mutations and SF3B1 disruption can alter RNA splicing, growth, and erythroid differentiation, but a well-established assay specific to p.His662Gln was not identified.
4
In silico results were mixed, with REVEL 0.628 and BayesDel 0.0218, while SpliceAI predicted no significant splice impact with a maximum delta score of 0.07, so computational evidence did not support PP3 or BP4.
Final determination:
Generic ACMG/AMP 2015 fallback rules do not meet benign, likely benign, likely pathogenic, or pathogenic combination thresholds, so the variant is classified as Variant of Uncertain Significance.
Criteria assessment
ACMG/AMP criteria review
Criteria shown when status is available
All criteria require review: For research and educational purposes only.
| Criterion | Status | Rationale | Evidence used |
|---|---|---|---|
| PVS1 | N/A | Gene-level review supports considering generic PVS1 for true loss-of-function variants in SF3B1, but NM_012433.4:c.1986C>A is a missense substitution and does not fall within the nonsense, frameshift, or canonical +/-1,2 splice categories used by the generic PVS1 framework. |
pvs1_gene_context
pvs1_variant_assessment
pvs1_generic_framework
|
| PS1 | Not assessed | No pathogenic or likely pathogenic comparator producing the same amino acid change was identified in the available sources, so PS1 could not be established. |
clinvar
|
| PS2 | Not assessed | No confirmed de novo occurrence with established maternity and paternity was identified for this variant. |
|
| PS3 | Not assessed | Published studies showed that SF3B1 pathway mutations and SF3B1 disruption can alter RNA splicing and hematopoietic function, but no well-established functional assay specific to p.(His662Gln) demonstrating a damaging effect was identified. |
PMID:21909114
PMID:25428262
oncokb
|
| PS4 | Not met | This variant has been observed in somatic cancer resources and is absent from ClinVar, but no germline case-control study or affected-individual enrichment dataset for this exact variant was identified, so PS4 is not met. |
oncokb
clinvar
|
| PM1 | Not met | Available hotspot review did not confirm that p.(His662Gln) lies in a statistically significant hotspot or a well-established critical region without benign variation, so PM1 is not met. |
hotspots
|
| PM2 | Met | This variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and present at very low frequency in gnomAD v4.1 (7/1613874 alleles; AF 4.33739e-06; highest population AF 3.12354e-05 in Finnish individuals; grpmax FAF 6.8e-07), which is below the 0.1% rarity threshold and supports PM2. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| PM3 | N/A | No evidence was identified for this variant in trans with a pathogenic variant in a recessive disease context, so PM3 does not apply. |
|
| PM4 | N/A | This is a missense substitution and does not cause a protein length change, so PM4 does not apply. |
|
| PM5 | N/A | Classic same-residue PM5 semantics could not be confirmed safely for this gene/framework, and no validated same-residue pathogenic or likely pathogenic comparator was established for use here. |
pm5_candidates
|
| PM6 | Not assessed | No assumed de novo occurrence without parental confirmation was identified for this variant. |
|
| PP1 | Not assessed | No segregation data were identified for this variant in affected family members. |
|
| PP2 | Not assessed | Available evidence did not establish a gene-specific missense-constraint rule suitable to apply PP2 for this variant. |
|
| PP3 | Not met | Computational evidence is not sufficiently concordant to support PP3. REVEL was 0.628 and BayesDel was 0.0218, while SpliceAI predicted no significant splice effect with a maximum delta score of 0.07. |
revel
bayesdel
spliceai
|
| PP4 | Not assessed | No phenotype-specific clinical information was provided to determine whether the presentation is highly specific for an SF3B1-related disorder. |
|
| PP5 | N/A | No reputable external pathogenic classification for this variant was identified in the reviewed germline sources. |
clinvar
|
| BA1 | Not met | Population frequency does not meet the benign stand-alone threshold. The highest observed population frequency in gnomAD v4.1 was 3.12354e-05, which is far below the 1% threshold. |
gnomad_v4
|
| BS1 | Not met | Population frequency does not meet the benign strong threshold. The highest observed population frequency in gnomAD v4.1 was 3.12354e-05, which is below the 0.3% threshold. |
gnomad_v4
|
| BS2 | Not assessed | Available population data do not establish observation of this variant in healthy individuals in a manner sufficient to apply BS2. |
gnomad_v4
|
| BS3 | Not assessed | Published studies showed functional consequences of SF3B1 disruption and broader SF3B1 pathway mutations, but no well-established assay specific to p.(His662Gln) demonstrating normal function was identified. |
PMID:21909114
PMID:25428262
oncokb
|
| BS4 | Not assessed | No informative family data were identified showing lack of segregation with disease. |
|
| BP1 | N/A | BP1 does not apply because the available evidence does not indicate a disease mechanism in which truncating variants predominate and missense variation is generally expected to be benign for SF3B1. |
pvs1_gene_context
|
| BP2 | Not assessed | No phase data or alternate molecular diagnosis information were identified to support BP2. |
|
| BP3 | Not assessed | No evidence was identified that this missense change lies in a repetitive region without known function. |
|
| BP4 | Not met | Computational evidence does not support a benign interpretation. REVEL was 0.628 and BayesDel was 0.0218, and SpliceAI predicted no significant splice effect with a maximum delta score of 0.07; these results are not sufficient to support BP4. |
revel
bayesdel
spliceai
|
| BP5 | Not assessed | No alternate molecular cause was provided that would explain the phenotype independently of this variant. |
|
| BP6 | N/A | No reputable external benign classification for this variant was identified in the reviewed germline sources. |
clinvar
|
| BP7 | N/A | BP7 does not apply because this variant is missense rather than synonymous or intronic outside the splice region. |
|
Disclaimer:
The content and results provided by LYFE Sciences are for research and educational purposes only and must not be used as a substitute for professional medical judgment, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making any clinical decisions.