LYFE Sciences · Project HERA
Variant Interpretation · Classification Report
Generated: 2026-05-18
Case ID: NM_012433.4_c.1986C_A_20260518_041915
Framework: ACMG/AMP 2015
Variant classification summary

NM_012433.4:c.1986C>A

SF3B1  · NP_036565.2:p.(His662Gln)  · NM_012433.4
GRCh37: chr2:198267371 G>T  ·  GRCh38: chr2:197402647 G>T
Gene: SF3B1 Transcript: NM_012433.4
Final call
VUS
PM2 supporting
All criteria require review: For research and educational purposes only.
Gene
SF3B1
Transcript
NM_012433.4
Protein
NP_036565.2:p.(His662Gln)
gnomAD AF
4.337389412060669e-06 (v4.1)
ClinVar
OncoKB
Likely Oncogenic
Interpretation summary
Generated evidence synthesis
1
The SF3B1 c.1986C>A (p.His662Gln) variant has been observed in somatic cancer curation resources and has not been reported in ClinVar.
2
This variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and is present at very low frequency in gnomAD v4.1 (7/1613874 alleles; AF 4.33739e-06; highest population AF 3.12354e-05), which is below the 0.1% rarity threshold used for PM2.
3
Published studies showed that SF3B1 pathway mutations and SF3B1 disruption can alter RNA splicing, growth, and erythroid differentiation, but a well-established assay specific to p.His662Gln was not identified.
4
In silico results were mixed, with REVEL 0.628 and BayesDel 0.0218, while SpliceAI predicted no significant splice impact with a maximum delta score of 0.07, so computational evidence did not support PP3 or BP4.
Final determination: Generic ACMG/AMP 2015 fallback rules do not meet benign, likely benign, likely pathogenic, or pathogenic combination thresholds, so the variant is classified as Variant of Uncertain Significance.
ACMG/AMP criteria review
Criteria shown when status is available
All criteria require review: For research and educational purposes only.
Criterion Status Rationale Evidence used
PVS1 N/A Gene-level review supports considering generic PVS1 for true loss-of-function variants in SF3B1, but NM_012433.4:c.1986C>A is a missense substitution and does not fall within the nonsense, frameshift, or canonical +/-1,2 splice categories used by the generic PVS1 framework.
pvs1_gene_context pvs1_variant_assessment pvs1_generic_framework
PS1 Not assessed No pathogenic or likely pathogenic comparator producing the same amino acid change was identified in the available sources, so PS1 could not be established.
clinvar
PS2 Not assessed No confirmed de novo occurrence with established maternity and paternity was identified for this variant.
PS3 Not assessed Published studies showed that SF3B1 pathway mutations and SF3B1 disruption can alter RNA splicing and hematopoietic function, but no well-established functional assay specific to p.(His662Gln) demonstrating a damaging effect was identified.
PMID:21909114 PMID:25428262 oncokb
PS4 Not met This variant has been observed in somatic cancer resources and is absent from ClinVar, but no germline case-control study or affected-individual enrichment dataset for this exact variant was identified, so PS4 is not met.
oncokb clinvar
PM1 Not met Available hotspot review did not confirm that p.(His662Gln) lies in a statistically significant hotspot or a well-established critical region without benign variation, so PM1 is not met.
hotspots
PM2 Met This variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and present at very low frequency in gnomAD v4.1 (7/1613874 alleles; AF 4.33739e-06; highest population AF 3.12354e-05 in Finnish individuals; grpmax FAF 6.8e-07), which is below the 0.1% rarity threshold and supports PM2.
gnomad_v2 gnomad_v4
PM3 N/A No evidence was identified for this variant in trans with a pathogenic variant in a recessive disease context, so PM3 does not apply.
PM4 N/A This is a missense substitution and does not cause a protein length change, so PM4 does not apply.
PM5 N/A Classic same-residue PM5 semantics could not be confirmed safely for this gene/framework, and no validated same-residue pathogenic or likely pathogenic comparator was established for use here.
pm5_candidates
PM6 Not assessed No assumed de novo occurrence without parental confirmation was identified for this variant.
PP1 Not assessed No segregation data were identified for this variant in affected family members.
PP2 Not assessed Available evidence did not establish a gene-specific missense-constraint rule suitable to apply PP2 for this variant.
PP3 Not met Computational evidence is not sufficiently concordant to support PP3. REVEL was 0.628 and BayesDel was 0.0218, while SpliceAI predicted no significant splice effect with a maximum delta score of 0.07.
revel bayesdel spliceai
PP4 Not assessed No phenotype-specific clinical information was provided to determine whether the presentation is highly specific for an SF3B1-related disorder.
PP5 N/A No reputable external pathogenic classification for this variant was identified in the reviewed germline sources.
clinvar
BA1 Not met Population frequency does not meet the benign stand-alone threshold. The highest observed population frequency in gnomAD v4.1 was 3.12354e-05, which is far below the 1% threshold.
gnomad_v4
BS1 Not met Population frequency does not meet the benign strong threshold. The highest observed population frequency in gnomAD v4.1 was 3.12354e-05, which is below the 0.3% threshold.
gnomad_v4
BS2 Not assessed Available population data do not establish observation of this variant in healthy individuals in a manner sufficient to apply BS2.
gnomad_v4
BS3 Not assessed Published studies showed functional consequences of SF3B1 disruption and broader SF3B1 pathway mutations, but no well-established assay specific to p.(His662Gln) demonstrating normal function was identified.
PMID:21909114 PMID:25428262 oncokb
BS4 Not assessed No informative family data were identified showing lack of segregation with disease.
BP1 N/A BP1 does not apply because the available evidence does not indicate a disease mechanism in which truncating variants predominate and missense variation is generally expected to be benign for SF3B1.
pvs1_gene_context
BP2 Not assessed No phase data or alternate molecular diagnosis information were identified to support BP2.
BP3 Not assessed No evidence was identified that this missense change lies in a repetitive region without known function.
BP4 Not met Computational evidence does not support a benign interpretation. REVEL was 0.628 and BayesDel was 0.0218, and SpliceAI predicted no significant splice effect with a maximum delta score of 0.07; these results are not sufficient to support BP4.
revel bayesdel spliceai
BP5 Not assessed No alternate molecular cause was provided that would explain the phenotype independently of this variant.
BP6 N/A No reputable external benign classification for this variant was identified in the reviewed germline sources.
clinvar
BP7 N/A BP7 does not apply because this variant is missense rather than synonymous or intronic outside the splice region.
Disclaimer: The content and results provided by LYFE Sciences are for research and educational purposes only and must not be used as a substitute for professional medical judgment, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making any clinical decisions.