LYFE Sciences · Project HERA
Variant Interpretation · Classification Report
Variant classification summary
NM_001330437.1:c.188A>G
PTPN11
· NP_001317366.1:p.(Tyr63Cys)
· NM_001330437.1
GRCh37: chr12:112888172 A>G
·
GRCh38: chr12:112450368 A>G
Gene:
PTPN11
Transcript:
NM_001330437.1
Final call
VUS
PS3 supporting
PP3 supporting
PP5 supporting
Variant details
Gene
PTPN11
Transcript
NM_001330437.1
Protein
NP_001317366.1:p.(Tyr63Cys)
gnomAD AF
8.678704443000749e-06 (v4.1)
ClinVar
Pathogenic
OncoKB
Likely Oncogenic
Classification rationale
Interpretation summary
Generated evidence synthesis
1
The PTPN11 c.188A>G (p.Tyr63Cys) variant has been reported in ClinVar as pathogenic, including an expert panel assertion from the ClinGen RASopathy Variant Curation Expert Panel.
2
This variant is present at very low frequency in gnomAD, with AF 0.00120% in v2.1 and AF 0.00087% in v4.1, which is below the RASopathy BA1 and BS1 thresholds but does not meet the PTPN11 VCEP requirement for PM2 because the variant is not absent from controls.
3
In a published functional study, SHP-2 phosphatase assays showed increased activity for Noonan syndrome-associated PTPN11 mutants including p.Tyr63Cys, and the RASopathy VCEP lists this assay type as an approved functional assay for PTPN11, supporting a gain-of-function effect.
4
Computational evidence supports a deleterious missense effect, with REVEL 0.955 above the PTPN11 VCEP PP3 threshold of 0.7, BayesDel 0.482421, and SpliceAI showing no significant splice impact with a maximum delta score of 0.03.
Final determination:
No criteria-combination rule matched the adjudicated criteria in the ClinGen RASopathy Expert Panel Specifications to the ACMG/AMP Variant Interpretation Guidelines for PTPN11 Version 2.3.0 v2.3.0 framework, so the variant remains a Variant of Uncertain Significance pending human review.
Criteria assessment
ACMG/AMP criteria review
Criteria shown when status is available
All criteria require review: For research and educational purposes only.
| Criterion | Status | Rationale | Evidence used |
|---|---|---|---|
| PVS1 | N/A | This is a missense variant, and the PTPN11 RASopathy specification marks PVS1 as not applicable. The generic PVS1 scaffold also indicates that this variant does not fall into a null-variant category. |
cspec
pvs1_gene_context
pvs1_variant_assessment
|
| PS1 | Not met | No previously established pathogenic variant producing the same p.Tyr63Cys amino acid change by a different nucleotide substitution was identified, so PS1 is not met. |
clinvar
cspec
|
| PS2 | Not assessed | Published reports document de novo PTPN11 variants in Noonan syndrome cohorts, but the available evidence reviewed here does not confirm p.Tyr63Cys as de novo with the parentage information required to assign PS2. |
PMID:12325025
PMID:15928039
cspec
|
| PS3 | Met | In a published functional study, SHP-2 phosphatase assays showed increased activity for Noonan syndrome-associated PTPN11 mutants including p.Tyr63Cys, consistent with a gain-of-function effect. The RASopathy VCEP lists SHP-2 phosphatase activity as an approved PTPN11 assay, supporting PS3 at the supporting level. |
PMID:15834506
vcep_svi_rasopathy_vcep_v2_approved_functional_studies
cspec
|
| PS4 | Not assessed | This variant has been reported in affected individuals with Noonan syndrome, including one report identifying Tyr63Cys among seven mutation-positive Japanese cases and another reporting Tyr63Cys in two unrelated families. However, the available evidence did not provide the point-based proband scoring details needed to assign a PS4 strength under the RASopathy VCEP framework. |
PMID:12161469
PMID:12325025
clinvar
cspec
|
| PM1 | N/A | Residue 63 lies within the N-SH2/PTP interaction interface listed in the PTPN11 specification, but the RASopathy VCEP states that PM1 is not applied to specific amino acid residues and directs residue-based evidence to PM5 instead. Because no qualifying same-codon comparator was established, PM1 was not applied. |
cspec
pm5_candidates
|
| PM2 | Not met | This variant is present in gnomAD, with AF 0.00120% in v2.1 (3/251010 alleles) and AF 0.00087% in v4.1 (14/1613144 alleles). Because the PTPN11 RASopathy specification requires absence from controls for PM2, PM2 is not met. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
cspec
|
| PM3 | N/A | PM3 is not applicable in the PTPN11 RASopathy specification. |
cspec
|
| PM4 | N/A | This is a missense variant and does not cause an in-frame protein length change or stop-loss event, so PM4 is not applicable. |
cspec
|
| PM5 | Not met | No qualifying different pathogenic or likely pathogenic missense change at the same codon was identified for application of PM5. The current variant itself cannot be used as its own same-codon comparator. |
pm5_candidates
cspec
clinvar
|
| PM6 | Not assessed | The available evidence did not document p.Tyr63Cys as assumed de novo without full parentage confirmation, so PM6 was not assigned. |
PMID:12325025
PMID:15928039
cspec
|
| PP1 | Not assessed | No segregation data with enough informative meioses were identified for p.Tyr63Cys, so PP1 was not assigned. |
PMID:12161469
PMID:12325025
cspec
|
| PP2 | Not assessed | The PTPN11 specification allows PP2 when the gene missense z score is greater than 3.09, but the reviewed evidence did not provide the gene-level z score needed to confirm PP2 here. |
cspec
|
| PP3 | Met | Computational evidence supports a deleterious effect. REVEL is 0.955, which is above the PTPN11 VCEP PP3 threshold of 0.7; BayesDel is 0.482421; and SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact with a maximum delta score of 0.03, supporting a missense rather than splice-driven interpretation. |
revel
bayesdel
spliceai
cspec
|
| PP4 | N/A | PP4 is not applicable in the PTPN11 RASopathy specification. |
cspec
|
| PP5 | Met | Expert panel ClinGen RASopathy Variant Curation Expert Panel classified as Pathogenic. |
cspec
clinvar
|
| BA1 | Not met | Population frequency is below the BA1 threshold. The highest observed subpopulation frequency is 0.00544% in gnomAD v2.1 East Asian and 0.00223% in gnomAD v4.1 East Asian, both below the RASopathy BA1 threshold of 0.05%. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
cspec
|
| BS1 | Not met | Population frequency is below the BS1 threshold. The highest observed subpopulation frequency is 0.00544% in gnomAD v2.1 East Asian and 0.00223% in gnomAD v4.1 East Asian, both below the RASopathy BS1 threshold of 0.025%. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
cspec
|
| BS2 | Not assessed | The available evidence does not show this variant in the number and context of unaffected individuals required for BS2 under the RASopathy specification. |
cspec
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| BS3 | N/A | BS3 is not applicable in the PTPN11 RASopathy specification. |
cspec
|
| BS4 | Not assessed | No non-segregation evidence for p.Tyr63Cys was identified, so BS4 was not assigned. |
PMID:12161469
PMID:12325025
cspec
|
| BP1 | N/A | This is a missense variant. In the RASopathy specification, BP1 is used for truncating variants in genes without an established loss-of-function disease correlation, so BP1 is not applicable here. |
cspec
|
| BP2 | Not assessed | No phase data or alternate pathogenic molecular explanation was identified to support BP2. |
cspec
|
| BP3 | N/A | BP3 is not applicable in the PTPN11 RASopathy specification. |
cspec
|
| BP4 | Not met | Computational evidence does not support BP4. REVEL is 0.955, which is well above the benign BP4 threshold of 0.3, and BayesDel is positive rather than reassuring. SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact, but this does not overcome the deleterious missense prediction profile. |
revel
bayesdel
spliceai
cspec
|
| BP5 | Not assessed | No alternate molecular diagnosis or independent cause sufficient to support BP5 was identified. |
cspec
|
| BP6 | N/A | BP6 is not applicable in the PTPN11 RASopathy specification. |
cspec
|
| BP7 | N/A | This is a missense variant rather than a synonymous, intronic, or non-coding change, so BP7 is not applicable. |
cspec
spliceai
|
Disclaimer:
The content and results provided by LYFE Sciences are for research and educational purposes only and must not be used as a substitute for professional medical judgment, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making any clinical decisions.