LYFE Sciences · Project HERA
Variant Interpretation · Classification Report
Variant classification summary
NM_007294.3:c.32T>G
BRCA1
· NP_009225.1:p.(Val11Gly)
· NM_007294.3
GRCh37: chr17:41276082 A>C
·
GRCh38: chr17:43124065 A>C
Gene:
BRCA1
Transcript:
NM_007294.3
Final call
Likely Pathogenic
PS3_Strong
PM2_Supporting
PP3_Supporting
PP5_Supporting
Variant details
Gene
BRCA1
Transcript
NM_007294.3
Protein
NP_009225.1:p.(Val11Gly)
gnomAD AF
ClinVar
Likely Pathogenic
OncoKB
Unknown Oncogenic Effect
Classification rationale
Interpretation summary
Generated evidence synthesis
1
The BRCA1 c.32T>G (p.(Val11Gly)) variant has not been observed in somatic cancers in COSMIC and has been reported in ClinVar, including a Likely Pathogenic expert-panel classification from ClinGen ENIGMA with additional conflicting submissions.
2
This variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and gnomAD v4.1, supporting rarity in population databases consistent with PM2_Supporting.
3
In calibrated functional data, this variant showed complete functional impact with loss of function and was summarized by the ENIGMA BRCA1 specification as meeting PS3_Strong.
4
This missense change is located in the BRCA1 RING domain, with BayesDel no-AF 0.325211 above the ENIGMA PP3 threshold of 0.28 and REVEL 0.753, while SpliceAI predicts no significant splice effect with a maximum delta score of 0.00; these findings support PP3 and do not support BP4.
Final determination:
Likely pathogenic based on 1 Strong and 3 Supporting pathogenic criteria under the ENIGMA BRCA1/2 Table 3 criteria-combination rules.
Criteria assessment
ACMG/AMP criteria review
Criteria shown when status is available
All criteria require review: For research and educational purposes only.
| Criterion | Status | Rationale | Evidence used |
|---|---|---|---|
| PVS1 | N/A | This variant is a missense substitution, p.(Val11Gly), and does not fall into the BRCA1 null-variant categories used for PVS1 such as nonsense, frameshift, initiation codon, or canonical ±1,2 splice-site change. |
cspec
pvs1_gene_context
pvs1_variant_assessment
|
| PS1 | Not assessed | No same-amino-acid pathogenic comparator or same-splicing-impact pathogenic comparator was identified in the reviewed materials, so PS1 was not established. |
cspec
|
| PS2 | N/A | This criterion is not used in the ENIGMA BRCA1 framework for this review. |
cspec
|
| PS3 | Met | In a calibrated functional study summarized by the ENIGMA BRCA1 specification, this variant showed loss of function with complete functional impact and behaved similarly to pathogenic control variants, supporting a damaging effect on BRCA1 protein function. |
vcep_specifications_table9_v1_2_2024_11_18
vcep_supplementarytables_v1_2_2024_11_18
PMID:30209399
|
| PS4 | Not assessed | No case-control study or quantified enrichment data were identified showing that this variant is significantly more common in affected individuals than in controls, so PS4 was not established. |
cspec
|
| PM1 | N/A | PM1 is not applied in the ENIGMA BRCA1/2 specification. |
cspec
|
| PM2 | Met | This variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and absent from gnomAD v4.1, supporting rarity in population databases and meeting PM2 at supporting strength in the reviewed evidence. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
cspec
|
| PM3 | Not assessed | No evidence was identified that this variant was observed with a second BRCA1 variant in a patient with BRCA1-related Fanconi anemia, so PM3 was not established. |
cspec
|
| PM4 | N/A | PM4 is not applied in the ENIGMA BRCA1/2 specification. |
cspec
|
| PM5 | N/A | For BRCA1, PM5 is repurposed for protein-truncating variants in eligible exons rather than classic same-residue missense logic. This variant is a missense substitution, so PM5 does not apply. |
cspec
pm5_candidates
vcep_specifications_table4_v1_2_2024_11_18
|
| PM6 | N/A | This criterion is not used in the ENIGMA BRCA1 framework for this review. |
cspec
|
| PP1 | Not assessed | No segregation data were identified for this variant, so PP1 was not established. |
cspec
|
| PP2 | N/A | PP2 is not applied in the ENIGMA BRCA1/2 specification. |
cspec
|
| PP3 | Met | This missense variant lies in the BRCA1 RING domain (aa 2-101), a clinically important functional domain. BayesDel no-AF is 0.325211, which is above the ENIGMA PP3 threshold of 0.28, and REVEL is 0.753, supporting a damaging protein effect. SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact with a maximum delta score of 0.00. |
cspec
bayesdel
revel
spliceai
|
| PP4 | Not met | The BRCA1 clinical-history likelihood ratio for this variant is 1.0618 based on 1 proband, which is below the ENIGMA PP4 supporting threshold of 2.08. This value is in the neutral zone and does not support PP4. |
vcep_pmid_31853058_brca1_clinical_history_lr
PMID:31853058
cspec
|
| PP5 | Met | Expert panel ClinGen ENIGMA BRCA1 and BRCA2 Variant Curation Expert Panel, ClinGen classified as Likely pathogenic. |
cspec
clinvar
|
| BA1 | Not met | This variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and gnomAD v4.1 and is therefore well below the ENIGMA BA1 stand-alone threshold of filter allele frequency greater than 0.1%. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
cspec
|
| BS1 | Not met | This variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and gnomAD v4.1 and therefore does not meet the ENIGMA BS1 population thresholds above 0.002% or 0.01%. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
cspec
|
| BS2 | Not assessed | No data were identified showing this variant in individuals without features of BRCA1-related Fanconi anemia at the point thresholds required for BS2, so BS2 was not established. |
cspec
|
| BS3 | Not met | Available functional evidence does not show a normal or non-damaging effect. Instead, calibrated functional data show complete loss of function, so BS3 is not met. |
vcep_specifications_table9_v1_2_2024_11_18
vcep_supplementarytables_v1_2_2024_11_18
PMID:30209399
|
| BS4 | Not assessed | No non-segregation data were identified for this variant, so BS4 was not established. |
cspec
|
| BP1 | Not met | This missense variant is located at codon 11 within the BRCA1 RING domain (aa 2-101), so it is not outside a clinically important functional domain. BP1_Strong therefore does not apply. |
cspec
spliceai
|
| BP2 | N/A | BP2 is not applied in the ENIGMA BRCA1/2 specification. |
cspec
|
| BP3 | N/A | BP3 is not applied in the ENIGMA BRCA1/2 specification. |
cspec
|
| BP4 | Not met | Although SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact with a maximum delta score of 0.00, BP4 is not met because this missense variant is in the BRCA1 RING domain and BayesDel no-AF is 0.325211, which is above the benign threshold of 0.15 rather than at or below it. REVEL is also elevated at 0.753. |
cspec
bayesdel
revel
spliceai
|
| BP5 | Not met | The BRCA1 clinical-history likelihood ratio for this variant is 1.0618 based on 1 proband, which is above the ENIGMA BP5 supporting threshold of 0.48. This value is in the neutral zone and does not support BP5. |
vcep_pmid_31853058_brca1_clinical_history_lr
PMID:31853058
cspec
|
| BP6 | N/A | BP6 is not applied in the ENIGMA BRCA1/2 specification. |
cspec
|
| BP7 | N/A | BP7 in this framework is used for silent or intronic variants, or RNA evidence contexts, and does not apply to this missense substitution. |
cspec
|
Disclaimer:
The content and results provided by LYFE Sciences are for research and educational purposes only and must not be used as a substitute for professional medical judgment, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making any clinical decisions.