LYFE Sciences · Project HERA
Variant Interpretation · Classification Report
Variant classification summary
NM_001354609.1:c.739T>C
BRAF
· NP_001341538.1:p.(Phe247Leu)
· NM_001354609.1
GRCh37: chr7:140501333 A>G
·
GRCh38: chr7:140801533 A>G
Gene:
BRAF
Transcript:
NM_001354609.1
Final call
VUS
PM1 moderate
PM2 supporting
PP2 supporting
PP3 supporting
PP5 supporting
Variant details
Gene
BRAF
Transcript
NM_001354609.1
Protein
NP_001341538.1:p.(Phe247Leu)
gnomAD AF
ClinVar
Pathogenic
OncoKB
Likely Oncogenic
Classification rationale
Interpretation summary
Generated evidence synthesis
1
The BRAF c.739T>C (p.Phe247Leu) variant has not been observed in somatic cancers in COSMIC and has been reported in ClinVar as pathogenic, including by the ClinGen RASopathy Variant Curation Expert Panel.
2
This variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and gnomAD v4.1, consistent with the BRAF RASopathy PM2_Supporting requirement for absence from population controls.
3
This missense change lies in BRAF exon 6, a region specifically designated by the BRAF RASopathy specification as eligible for PM1.
4
Computational evidence supports a deleterious effect, with REVEL 0.902 above the BRAF RASopathy PP3 threshold of 0.7, BayesDel 0.278133, and SpliceAI showing no meaningful splice impact with a maximum delta score of 0.10.
Final determination:
No criteria-combination rule matched the adjudicated criteria in the ClinGen RASopathy Expert Panel Specifications to the ACMG/AMP Variant Interpretation Guidelines for BRAF Version 2.3.0 v2.3.0 framework, so the variant remains a Variant of Uncertain Significance pending human review.
Criteria assessment
ACMG/AMP criteria review
Criteria shown when status is available
All criteria require review: For research and educational purposes only.
| Criterion | Status | Rationale | Evidence used |
|---|---|---|---|
| PVS1 | N/A | This is a missense variant, not a predicted null variant, and the BRAF RASopathy framework marks PVS1 as not applicable for this case. |
cspec
pvs1_gene_context
pvs1_variant_assessment
|
| PS1 | Not assessed | No verified evidence was identified showing the same amino acid change from a different nucleotide substitution, or an established analogous RAF1/BRAF residue match that satisfies the BRAF RASopathy PS1 rule. |
cspec
vcep_raf_alignment
|
| PS2 | Not assessed | Published evidence suggesting possible de novo occurrence was flagged for follow-up, but no directly verified proband-level parental testing details were available to assign de novo points under the BRAF RASopathy framework. |
cspec
PMID:20301303
PMID:20301365
PMID:20876176
PMID:25173338
|
| PS3 | Not assessed | Review of the RASopathy VCEP approved functional study materials did not confirm this exact variant in a qualifying approved assay, so pathogenic functional evidence was not applied. |
cspec
vcep_svi_rasopathy_vcep_v2_approved_functional_studies
oncokb
PMID:28512244
PMID:29533785
PMID:31515458
|
| PS4 | Not assessed | The variant is reported in ClinVar, but a deduplicated count of unrelated affected individuals and the corresponding RASopathy point total were not directly verified from the available materials, so PS4 was not assigned. |
clinvar
cspec
PMID:20301303
PMID:20301365
PMID:20876176
PMID:25173338
|
| PM1 | Met | This missense variant is in BRAF exon 6, and the BRAF RASopathy specification lists exon 6 as a critical, well-established region eligible for PM1. |
cspec
|
| PM2 | Met | This variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and absent from gnomAD v4.1, which meets the BRAF RASopathy PM2 requirement of absence from population controls. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
cspec
|
| PM3 | N/A | PM3 is not used in the BRAF RASopathy framework for this autosomal dominant disorder context. |
cspec
|
| PM4 | N/A | This is a missense substitution and does not cause a protein length change, so PM4 does not apply. |
cspec
|
| PM5 | Not assessed | The BRAF framework uses classic same-residue PM5 logic, but no verified qualifying pathogenic or likely pathogenic missense comparator at codon 247 was confirmed from the available materials. |
cspec
pm5_candidates
|
| PM6 | Not assessed | Possible de novo literature sources were identified, but no directly verified report was available to determine whether reduced de novo points should be assigned under PM6. |
cspec
PMID:20301303
PMID:20876176
|
| PP1 | Not assessed | No segregation data were identified showing this variant co-segregating with disease in informative meioses. |
cspec
PMID:25173338
|
| PP2 | Met | This is a missense variant in BRAF, a gene with missense-mediated RASopathy disease, and the gene-level gnomAD missense z score is 3.72, which is above the BRAF RASopathy PP2 threshold of 3.09. |
cspec
gnomad_v4
|
| PP3 | Met | Computational evidence supports a deleterious missense effect: REVEL is 0.902, which is above the BRAF RASopathy PP3 threshold of 0.7, while SpliceAI predicts no meaningful splice effect with a maximum delta score of 0.10. BayesDel is also positive at 0.278133. |
cspec
revel
spliceai
bayesdel
|
| PP4 | N/A | PP4 is not used in the BRAF RASopathy framework because phenotype-based case evidence is incorporated through PS4. |
cspec
|
| PP5 | Met | Expert panel ClinGen RASopathy Variant Curation Expert Panel classified as Pathogenic. |
cspec
clinvar
|
| BA1 | Not met | This variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and v4.1 and therefore is below the BRAF RASopathy BA1 threshold of 0.05% filtering allele frequency. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
cspec
|
| BS1 | Not met | This variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and v4.1 and therefore is below the BRAF RASopathy BS1 threshold of 0.025% filtering allele frequency. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
cspec
|
| BS2 | Not assessed | No evidence was identified showing this variant in unaffected individuals sufficient to assign benign observation points. |
cspec
|
| BS3 | N/A | BS3 is not applicable in the BRAF RASopathy framework for this case. |
cspec
|
| BS4 | Not assessed | No lack-of-segregation evidence was identified for this variant in an informative family. |
cspec
PMID:25173338
|
| BP1 | N/A | BP1 in the BRAF RASopathy framework is reserved for truncating loss-of-function variants in a gain-of-function disease setting, and this variant is missense. |
cspec
|
| BP2 | Not assessed | No co-occurrence or phase data were identified showing this variant with an alternative molecular cause of disease in the same gene. |
cspec
PMID:20301303
|
| BP3 | N/A | BP3 is not applicable in the BRAF RASopathy framework. |
cspec
|
| BP4 | Not met | Although SpliceAI predicts no meaningful splice effect with a maximum delta score of 0.10, the missense REVEL score is 0.902, which is well above the BRAF RASopathy BP4 threshold of 0.3, so benign computational evidence is not supported. |
cspec
revel
spliceai
|
| BP5 | Not assessed | No alternative molecular explanation for the phenotype was identified that would support benign points under BP5. |
cspec
|
| BP6 | N/A | BP6 is not used in this VCEP framework, so outside benign assertions were not counted as independent evidence. |
cspec
|
| BP7 | N/A | This is not a synonymous, intronic, or other non-coding variant, so BP7 does not apply. |
cspec
spliceai
|
Disclaimer:
The content and results provided by LYFE Sciences are for research and educational purposes only and must not be used as a substitute for professional medical judgment, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making any clinical decisions.