LYFE Sciences · Project HERA
Variant Interpretation · Classification Report
Variant classification summary
NM_000264.5:c.-9_-4del
PTCH1
· NP_000255.2:p.?
· NM_000264.5
GRCh37: chr9:98270646 TGCCGCC>T
·
GRCh38: chr9:95508364 TGCCGCC>T
Gene:
PTCH1
Transcript:
NM_000264.5
Final call
Benign
BA1 stand-alone benign
BS1 strong benign
Variant details
Gene
PTCH1
Transcript
NM_000264.5
Protein
NP_000255.2:p.?
gnomAD AF
0.013118005334506558 (v4.1)
ClinVar
Benign
OncoKB
Classification rationale
Interpretation summary
Generated evidence synthesis
1
The PTCH1 NM_000264.5:c.-9_-4del (NP_000255.2:p.?) variant has been reported in ClinVar, where current submissions classify it as benign or likely benign.
2
This variant is common in population databases, with an allele frequency of 1.31180% in gnomAD v4.1, 0.75389% in gnomAD v2.1, and 1.26862% in gnomAD-Canada, which is above the non-VCEP BA1 benign threshold of 1%.
3
In silico splice prediction does not support a splice-disrupting effect, with SpliceAI showing a maximum delta score of 0.01.
Final determination:
Generic ACMG/AMP 2015 fallback rules support a Benign classification because either BA1 is met or at least two strong benign criteria are present.
Criteria assessment
ACMG/AMP criteria review
Criteria shown when status is available
All criteria require review: For research and educational purposes only.
| Criterion | Status | Rationale | Evidence used |
|---|---|---|---|
| PVS1 | Not met | PTCH1 loss of function is an established disease mechanism, but this 5′ UTR deletion does not fall within the generic PVS1 null-variant categories for nonsense, frameshift, or canonical ±1/2 splice variants, so PVS1 is not supported. |
pvs1_gene_context
pvs1_variant_assessment
pvs1_generic_framework
|
| PS1 | N/A | PS1 is not applicable because this variant is not a protein-coding substitution with an established same-amino-acid pathogenic comparator. |
|
| PS2 | Not assessed | No confirmed de novo data were identified for this variant. |
|
| PS3 | Not assessed | No well-established functional studies for this specific variant were identified that demonstrate a damaging effect. |
oncokb
|
| PS4 | Not met | Available evidence does not show enrichment of this variant in affected individuals, and its population frequency is high for a pathogenic PTCH1 germline allele. |
clinvar
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
gnomad_canada
|
| PM1 | N/A | PM1 is not applicable because this variant is in the 5′ UTR and not in an established mutational hotspot or critical functional protein domain without benign variation. |
|
| PM2 | Not met | This variant is not absent or rare in population databases. Its allele frequency is 1.31180% in gnomAD v4.1, 0.75389% in gnomAD v2.1, and 1.26862% in gnomAD-Canada, which is far above the PM2 rarity threshold of less than 0.1%. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
gnomad_canada
|
| PM3 | Not assessed | No evidence was identified showing this variant in trans with a pathogenic variant in a recessive disease context. |
|
| PM4 | N/A | PM4 is not applicable because this is a 5′ UTR deletion and there is no evidence of a protein length change from an in-frame coding alteration or stop-loss event. |
|
| PM5 | N/A | PM5 is not applicable because this variant is not a missense change, and same-residue missense comparator logic could not be applied. |
pm5_candidates
|
| PM6 | Not assessed | No assumed de novo evidence without confirmed parentage was identified for this variant. |
|
| PP1 | Not assessed | No segregation data were identified for this variant. |
|
| PP2 | N/A | PP2 is not applicable because this variant is not a missense change. |
|
| PP3 | Not assessed | Computational evidence does not support a damaging splice effect. SpliceAI shows a maximum delta score of 0.01, which is below typical splice-impact concern thresholds, and missense predictors such as REVEL and BayesDel are not applicable to this deletion. |
spliceai
|
| PP4 | Not assessed | No phenotype-specific evidence was identified that is sufficiently specific to support PTCH1-related disease on its own for this variant. |
|
| PP5 | Not assessed | PP5 was not applied because no independent reputable-source pathogenic classification without available supporting evidence was identified. |
clinvar
|
| BA1 | Met | This variant exceeds the stand-alone benign frequency threshold of greater than 1%. The overall allele frequency is 1.31180% in gnomAD v4.1, with a highest observed subpopulation frequency of 2.30931% in the Middle Eastern population; it is also 1.26862% in gnomAD-Canada and 1.25285% in the highest-frequency gnomAD v2.1 subpopulation. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
gnomad_canada
|
| BS1 | Met | Population frequency is well above the strong benign threshold of greater than 0.3%. The allele frequency is 1.31180% in gnomAD v4.1, 0.75389% in gnomAD v2.1, and 1.26862% in gnomAD-Canada. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
gnomad_canada
|
| BS2 | Not assessed | Although this variant is common in population databases, no dataset here directly establishes occurrence in clinically unaffected individuals under a disease-specific BS2 framework for PTCH1. |
gnomad_v4
|
| BS3 | Not assessed | No well-established functional studies for this specific variant were identified that demonstrate no damaging effect. |
oncokb
|
| BS4 | Not assessed | No evidence was identified showing lack of segregation with disease in affected family members. |
|
| BP1 | N/A | BP1 is not applicable because this variant is not a missense change. |
|
| BP2 | Not assessed | No phase or co-occurrence data were identified for this variant. |
|
| BP3 | Not assessed | Available evidence does not establish that this deletion lies within a benign repetitive region lacking known function for ACMG BP3 use. |
|
| BP4 | Not assessed | SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact with a maximum delta score of 0.01, but broader benign computational evidence for this 5′ UTR deletion is limited and missense predictors are not applicable. |
spliceai
|
| BP5 | Not assessed | No alternate molecular cause was identified that would explain the phenotype independently of this variant. |
|
| BP6 | Not assessed | BP6 was not applied because the available ClinVar assertions are from single submitters without an expert-panel benign assertion serving as a standalone reputable-source criterion here. |
clinvar
|
| BP7 | N/A | BP7 is not applicable because this variant is neither synonymous nor intronic. |
spliceai
|
Disclaimer:
The content and results provided by LYFE Sciences are for research and educational purposes only and must not be used as a substitute for professional medical judgment, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making any clinical decisions.