LYFE Sciences · Project HERA
Variant Interpretation · Classification Report
Variant classification summary
NM_000314.8:c.322C>G
PTEN
· NP_000305.3:p.(Leu108Val)
· NM_000314.8
GRCh37: chr10:89692838 C>G
·
GRCh38: chr10:87933081 C>G
Gene:
PTEN
Transcript:
NM_000314.8
Final call
VUS
PM2 supporting
PP2 supporting
BS3 supporting
Variant details
Gene
PTEN
Transcript
NM_000314.8
Protein
NP_000305.3:p.(Leu108Val)
gnomAD AF
ClinVar
OncoKB
Likely Oncogenic
Classification rationale
Interpretation summary
Generated evidence synthesis
1
The PTEN c.322C>G (p.Leu108Val) variant has not been observed in somatic cancers in COSMIC and has not been reported in ClinVar.
2
This variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1, gnomAD v4.1, and gnomAD-Canada v1.0, which supports rarity below the PTEN PM2 threshold of 0.001%.
3
In the PTEN saturation mutagenesis phosphatase assay accepted by the PTEN Expert Panel, p.Leu108Val had a high-confidence cumulative fitness score of 1.160568514, which is above the BS3 threshold of >0 and well above the PS3_Moderate damaging threshold of ≤-1.11, supporting no damaging effect on protein function.
4
Computational evidence is indeterminate overall: REVEL is 0.514, which is between the PTEN BP4 cutoff of <0.5 and PP3 cutoff of >0.7; BayesDel is 0.180271; and SpliceAI predicts no splice impact with a maximum delta score of 0.00.
Final determination:
No criteria-combination rule matched the adjudicated criteria in the Richards et.al., 2015 - Combining rules v3.2.0 framework, so the variant remains a Variant of Uncertain Significance pending human review.
Criteria assessment
ACMG/AMP criteria review
Criteria shown when status is available
All criteria require review: For research and educational purposes only.
| Criterion | Status | Rationale | Evidence used |
|---|---|---|---|
| PVS1 | N/A | This variant is a missense substitution, p.(Leu108Val), and does not fall within the PTEN null-variant categories used for PVS1. |
pvs1_variant_assessment
vcep_pvs1_decisiontree_pten
cspec
|
| PS1 | Not assessed | No validated previously established pathogenic variant producing the same amino acid change was identified in the available evidence, so PS1 was not assessed. |
|
| PS2 | Not assessed | No confirmed de novo observation with maternity and paternity established was identified for this variant. |
clinvar
|
| PS3 | Not met | In the PTEN saturation mutagenesis phosphatase assay accepted by the PTEN Expert Panel, p.(Leu108Val) had a high-confidence cumulative fitness score of 1.160568514, which is above the damaging threshold for PS3_Moderate of ≤-1.11 and does not support a damaging functional effect. |
vcep_mmc2
cspec
|
| PS4 | Not assessed | No affected-proband count, specificity score, or case-control enrichment data were identified for this variant. |
clinvar
|
| PM1 | Not met | Residue Leu108 is outside the PTEN Expert Panel PM1 catalytic motif ranges 90-94, 123-130, and 166-168, and the available hotspot review did not provide a confirmed hotspot call at this residue. |
cspec
hotspots
|
| PM2 | Met | This variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1, gnomAD v4.1, and gnomAD-Canada v1.0, which is below the PTEN PM2 threshold of 0.001% and supports rarity. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
gnomad_canada
cspec
|
| PM3 | N/A | PM3 is not applicable in the PTEN Expert Panel framework. |
cspec
|
| PM4 | N/A | This variant does not cause a protein length change, in-frame insertion/deletion, or stop-loss event, so PM4 does not apply. |
cspec
|
| PM5 | Not assessed | No validated pathogenic or likely pathogenic missense comparator at the same residue was established from the available evidence, so PM5 was not assessed. |
pm5_candidates
cspec
|
| PM6 | Not assessed | No assumed de novo observation without parental confirmation was identified for this variant. |
clinvar
|
| PP1 | Not assessed | No segregation data were identified for this variant. |
clinvar
|
| PP2 | Met | This is a missense variant in PTEN, a gene for which the PTEN Expert Panel retains PP2 for missense variation as a disease mechanism with a low rate of benign missense variation. |
cspec
|
| PP3 | Not met | Computational evidence does not meet the PTEN PP3 threshold for missense variants: REVEL is 0.514, which is below the required >0.7 threshold. SpliceAI predicts no splice impact with a maximum delta score of 0.00, and BayesDel is 0.180271 but does not overcome the PTEN-specific REVEL rule. |
revel
spliceai
bayesdel
cspec
|
| PP4 | N/A | PP4 is not applicable in the PTEN Expert Panel framework because phenotype specificity is incorporated into PS4. |
cspec
|
| PP5 | N/A | PP5 is not applicable in the PTEN Expert Panel framework. |
cspec
|
| BA1 | Not met | This variant is absent from population databases and does not meet the PTEN BA1 threshold of >0.056%. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
gnomad_canada
cspec
|
| BS1 | Not met | This variant is absent from population databases and does not meet the PTEN BS1 thresholds of 0.00043%-0.0043% for supporting or 0.0043%-0.056% for strong evidence. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
gnomad_canada
cspec
|
| BS2 | Not assessed | No healthy or PTEN-hamartoma-tumor-syndrome-unaffected homozygous observation was identified for this variant. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
gnomad_canada
cspec
|
| BS3 | Met | In the PTEN saturation mutagenesis phosphatase assay accepted by the PTEN Expert Panel, p.(Leu108Val) had a high-confidence cumulative fitness score of 1.160568514, which is above the BS3 threshold of >0 and supports no damaging effect on protein function. |
vcep_mmc2
cspec
|
| BS4 | Not assessed | No lack-of-segregation data were identified for this variant. |
clinvar
|
| BP1 | N/A | BP1 is not applicable in the PTEN Expert Panel framework. |
cspec
|
| BP2 | Not assessed | No in trans, in cis, or phase-unknown observation with another pathogenic or likely pathogenic PTEN variant was identified for this variant. |
clinvar
|
| BP3 | N/A | BP3 is not applicable in the PTEN Expert Panel framework. |
cspec
|
| BP4 | Not met | Computational evidence does not meet the PTEN BP4 threshold for missense variants because REVEL is 0.514, which is above the benign cutoff of <0.5. SpliceAI predicts no splice impact with a maximum delta score of 0.00, but the PTEN missense BP4 rule is based on REVEL. |
revel
spliceai
cspec
|
| BP5 | Not assessed | No alternate molecular explanation with non-overlapping phenotype information was identified for this variant. |
|
| BP6 | N/A | BP6 is not applicable in the PTEN Expert Panel framework. |
cspec
|
| BP7 | N/A | This variant is missense rather than synonymous or qualifying intronic, so BP7 does not apply. |
cspec
spliceai
|
Disclaimer:
The content and results provided by LYFE Sciences are for research and educational purposes only and must not be used as a substitute for professional medical judgment, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making any clinical decisions.