LYFE Sciences · Project HERA
Variant Interpretation · Classification Report
Generated: 2026-05-26
Case ID: NM_000314.8_c.367C_G_20260526_193152
Framework: ACMG/AMP 2015
Variant classification summary

NM_000314.8:c.367C>G

PTEN  · NP_000305.3:p.(His123Asp)  · NM_000314.8
GRCh37: chr10:89692883 C>G  ·  GRCh38: chr10:87933126 C>G
Gene: PTEN Transcript: NM_000314.8
Final call
Likely Pathogenic
PS3 moderate PM1 moderate PM2 supporting PM5 moderate PP2 supporting PP3 supporting PP5 supporting
All criteria require review: For research and educational purposes only.
Gene
PTEN
Transcript
NM_000314.8
Protein
NP_000305.3:p.(His123Asp)
gnomAD AF
ClinVar
Pathogenic
OncoKB
Oncogenic
Interpretation summary
Generated evidence synthesis
1
The PTEN c.367C>G (p.His123Asp) variant has been observed in somatic cancers (COSMIC COSV64294365, n=3) and has been reported in ClinVar, including a pathogenic expert-panel classification.
2
This variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1, gnomAD v4.1, and gnomAD-Canada, which is below the PTEN Expert Panel PM2 threshold for population rarity.
3
In the PTEN saturation mutagenesis phosphatase assay, p.His123Asp showed a high-confidence damaging result with cumulative fitness score -4.3458, which is below the PTEN Expert Panel PS3_Moderate threshold of <= -1.11.
4
Computational evidence supports a deleterious effect, with REVEL 0.98 above the PTEN Expert Panel PP3 threshold of >0.7 and BayesDel 0.601229 positive, while SpliceAI max delta 0.01 does not suggest splice disruption.
5
This variant also affects a PTEN catalytic motif residue and a different missense change at the same codon has been established as pathogenic, supporting PM1 and PM5 under the PTEN specification.
Final determination: Rule13 in the Richards et.al., 2015 - Combining rules v3.2.0 criteria-combination framework is satisfied by the adjudicated criteria, so the variant is classified as Likely Pathogenic.
ACMG/AMP criteria review
Criteria shown when status is available
All criteria require review: For research and educational purposes only.
Criterion Status Rationale Evidence used
PVS1 N/A This is a missense variant, not a nonsense, frameshift, canonical +/-1 or 2 splice, or exon-level loss-of-function event, so the PTEN-specific PVS1 decision tree does not apply.
cspec pvs1_gene_context pvs1_variant_assessment vcep_pvs1_decisiontree_pten
PS1 Not met No evidence was identified that this nucleotide change produces the same amino acid substitution as a previously established pathogenic variant through a different DNA change.
cspec clinvar
PS2 Not assessed No confirmed de novo occurrence with documented maternity and paternity confirmation was identified.
cspec clinvar PMID:11918710
PS3 Met In the PTEN saturation mutagenesis phosphatase assay, p.His123Asp had a cumulative fitness score of -4.3458 with a high-confidence result flag, which is below the PTEN Expert Panel PS3_Moderate threshold of <= -1.11 and supports a damaging effect on PTEN function.
cspec vcep_mmc2
PS4 Not assessed This variant has been reported in ClinVar and in somatic cancer databases, but no case-control enrichment data or PTEN Expert Panel phenotype specificity score was identified to support PS4.
cspec clinvar oncokb
PM1 Met This missense variant affects codon 123, which lies within the PTEN catalytic motif spanning residues 123-130 defined by the PTEN Expert Panel as a critical functional region for PM1.
cspec
PM2 Met This variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1, gnomAD v4.1, and gnomAD-Canada, which is below the PTEN Expert Panel PM2 threshold of <0.00001 (0.001%) and supports rarity in population databases.
cspec gnomad_v2 gnomad_v4 gnomad_canada
PM3 N/A PM3 is not applicable in the PTEN Expert Panel framework for this disorder context.
cspec
PM4 N/A This variant does not cause an in-frame insertion, in-frame deletion, or stop-loss event, so PM4 does not apply.
cspec
PM5 Met A different missense change at the same residue, PTEN p.His123Arg, is established as pathogenic by expert panel review in ClinVar. The observed substitution p.His123Asp has a BLOSUM62 score of -1, which is equal to or more deleterious than the comparator p.His123Arg score of 0, meeting the PTEN Expert Panel PM5 rule.
cspec clinvar
PM6 Not assessed No assumed de novo occurrence with the required phenotype and family-history context was identified.
cspec clinvar PMID:11918710
PP1 Not assessed No segregation data were identified to show co-segregation with disease across informative meioses.
cspec clinvar
PP2 Met This is a missense variant in PTEN, a gene for which the PTEN Expert Panel permits PP2 because missense variation is a recognized disease mechanism and benign missense variation is comparatively constrained.
cspec
PP3 Met REVEL is 0.98, which is above the PTEN Expert Panel PP3 threshold of >0.7 and supports a deleterious missense effect. BayesDel is also positive at 0.601229, while SpliceAI shows a low maximum delta score of 0.01, which does not suggest a splice effect.
cspec revel bayesdel spliceai
PP4 N/A PP4 is not applicable in the PTEN Expert Panel framework because phenotype specificity is incorporated into PS4 scoring.
cspec
PP5 Met Expert panel Clingen PTEN Variant Curation Expert Panel, Clingen classified as Pathogenic.
cspec clinvar
BA1 Not met This variant is absent from population databases and does not meet the PTEN Expert Panel BA1 threshold of >0.00056 (0.056%).
cspec gnomad_v2 gnomad_v4 gnomad_canada
BS1 Not met This variant is absent from population databases and does not meet the PTEN Expert Panel BS1 thresholds of 0.0000043 to 0.00056.
cspec gnomad_v2 gnomad_v4 gnomad_canada
BS2 Not assessed No homozygous observations in healthy or PTEN hamartoma tumor syndrome-unaffected individuals were identified.
cspec gnomad_v2 gnomad_v4 gnomad_canada
BS3 Not met Available functional evidence does not show preserved PTEN function. Instead, the PTEN phosphatase assay showed a damaging result with cumulative fitness score -4.3458, so BS3 is not supported.
cspec vcep_mmc2
BS4 Not assessed No data were identified showing lack of segregation in one or more affected families.
cspec clinvar
BP1 N/A BP1 is not applicable in the PTEN Expert Panel framework.
cspec
BP2 Not assessed No phase data were identified showing this variant in trans with a pathogenic PTEN variant or recurrently in cis/phase unknown with pathogenic PTEN variants.
cspec clinvar
BP3 N/A BP3 is not applicable in the PTEN Expert Panel framework.
cspec
BP4 Not met Computational evidence does not support a benign effect. REVEL is 0.98, which is above the PTEN Expert Panel benign threshold of <0.5 for missense variants.
cspec revel
BP5 Not assessed No alternate highly penetrant molecular explanation with non-overlapping phenotype was identified to support BP5.
cspec
BP6 N/A BP6 is not applicable in the PTEN Expert Panel framework.
cspec
BP7 N/A This is not a synonymous or qualifying deep intronic variant, so BP7 does not apply.
cspec spliceai
Disclaimer: The content and results provided by LYFE Sciences are for research and educational purposes only and must not be used as a substitute for professional medical judgment, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making any clinical decisions.