LYFE Sciences · Project HERA
Variant Interpretation · Classification Report
Generated: 2026-05-27
Case ID: NM_001202543.1_c._25175G_A_20260527_195325
Framework: ACMG/AMP 2015
Variant classification summary

NM_001202543.1:c.*25175G>A

 ·   · 
GRCh37: None  ·  GRCh38: None
Gene: Transcript:
Final call
VUS
All criteria require review: For research and educational purposes only.
Gene
Transcript
Protein
gnomAD AF
ClinVar
None
OncoKB
None
Interpretation summary
Generated evidence synthesis
1
The NM_001202543.1:c.*25175G>A variant could not be assigned to a validated gene, genomic coordinate, or protein consequence, so somatic cancer and germline disease database observations were not established.
2
Population frequency could not be evaluated because a validated genomic representation was not available for gnomAD-based review.
3
No published functional evidence establishing either a damaging or benign effect was identified, and gene-level loss-of-function context remained unresolved for PVS1 consideration.
4
SpliceAI, REVEL, and BayesDel results were not available for this variant representation, so computational evidence could not support either PP3 or BP4.
Final determination: Generic ACMG/AMP 2015 fallback rules do not meet benign, likely benign, likely pathogenic, or pathogenic combination thresholds, so the variant is classified as Variant of Uncertain Significance.
ACMG/AMP criteria review
Criteria shown when status is available
All criteria require review: For research and educational purposes only.
Criterion Status Rationale Evidence used
PVS1 Not assessed This variant description does not have a validated gene assignment or transcript-bounded consequence, and germline loss-of-function disease mechanism could not be established for PVS1 use. Available evidence does not support applying generic PVS1 at this time.
pvs1_gene_context pvs1_variant_assessment pvs1_generic_framework
PS1 N/A This submitted variant is described in the 3' untranslated region and does not define an amino acid substitution, so same-amino-acid-change evidence under PS1 is not applicable.
PS2 Not assessed No confirmed de novo data were identified for this variant, so PS2 is not assessed.
PS3 Not assessed No published functional study establishing a damaging effect for this variant was identified, so PS3 is not assessed.
PS4 Not assessed Case-control or prevalence data showing enrichment in affected individuals were not identified, so PS4 is not assessed.
PM1 N/A This submitted variant is not a protein-altering missense change with an established critical residue or functional domain, so PM1 is not applicable.
PM2 Not assessed Population frequency could not be established because no validated genomic coordinates were available for gnomAD-based review, so PM2 is not assessed.
PM3 Not assessed No allelic-phase or recessive case evidence was identified for this variant, so PM3 is not assessed.
PM4 N/A This variant is not an in-frame protein length change, so PM4 is not applicable.
PM5 N/A This submitted variant does not define a missense residue change, and same-residue missense comparator logic could not be applied. PM5 is not applicable.
pm5_candidates
PM6 Not assessed No assumed de novo evidence without full parental confirmation was identified for this variant, so PM6 is not assessed.
PP1 Not assessed No segregation data were identified for this variant, so PP1 is not assessed.
PP2 N/A This submitted variant is not a missense change, so PP2 is not applicable.
PP3 Not assessed Computational evidence could not be established because SpliceAI, REVEL, and BayesDel results were not available for a validated genomic representation of this variant. PP3 is not assessed.
PP4 Not assessed No phenotype-specific evidence linking this variant to a highly specific monogenic presentation was identified, so PP4 is not assessed.
PP5 Not assessed No established pathogenic assertion from a qualifying external source was identified for this variant, so PP5 is not assessed.
BA1 Not assessed A population frequency high enough for BA1 could not be evaluated because no validated genomic coordinates were available. BA1 is not assessed.
BS1 Not assessed Population frequency relative to a benign threshold could not be evaluated because no validated genomic coordinates were available. BS1 is not assessed.
BS2 Not assessed No evidence showing this variant in healthy individuals at a frequency inconsistent with disease was identified, so BS2 is not assessed.
BS3 Not assessed No published functional study showing no damaging effect for this variant was identified, so BS3 is not assessed.
BS4 Not assessed No non-segregation data were identified for this variant, so BS4 is not assessed.
BP1 N/A This submitted variant is not a missense change, so BP1 is not applicable.
BP2 Not assessed No phase data showing this variant with another pathogenic variant in a configuration supporting BP2 were identified, so BP2 is not assessed.
BP3 N/A This variant is not an in-frame change in a repetitive region without known function, so BP3 is not applicable.
BP4 Not assessed Computational evidence supporting no impact was not available because SpliceAI, REVEL, and BayesDel results were not established for a validated genomic representation of this variant. BP4 is not assessed.
BP5 Not assessed No evidence was identified showing that an alternate molecular cause fully explains the phenotype while this variant is present, so BP5 is not assessed.
BP6 Not assessed No qualifying external benign assertion was identified for this variant, so BP6 is not assessed.
BP7 N/A BP7 applies to synonymous or certain intronic variants without predicted splice impact. This submitted 3' untranslated region variant does not meet that criterion definition, so BP7 is not applicable.
Disclaimer: The content and results provided by LYFE Sciences are for research and educational purposes only and must not be used as a substitute for professional medical judgment, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making any clinical decisions.