LYFE Sciences · Project HERA
Variant Interpretation · Classification Report
Variant classification summary
NM_198253.2:c.1950+10C>T
TERT
· NP_937983.2:p.?
· NM_198253.2
GRCh37: chr5:1280263 G>A
·
GRCh38: chr5:1280148 G>A
Gene:
TERT
Transcript:
NM_198253.2
Final call
Benign
BA1 stand-alone benign
BP4 supporting
Variant details
Gene
TERT
Transcript
NM_198253.2
Protein
NP_937983.2:p.?
gnomAD AF
0.012166515904387802 (v4.1)
ClinVar
Benign
OncoKB
Classification rationale
Interpretation summary
Generated evidence synthesis
1
The TERT c.1950+10C>T (p.?) variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign by 14 clinical laboratories.
2
This variant is common in population databases, with allele frequencies of 1.36750% in gnomAD v2.1 and 1.21665% in gnomAD v4.1, both above the 1% BA1 threshold, and reaches approximately 4.14% to 4.07% in the Finnish population.
3
In silico splice prediction does not support a clinically meaningful splicing effect, with SpliceAI showing a maximum delta score of 0.07.
Final determination:
Generic ACMG/AMP 2015 fallback rules support a Benign classification because either BA1 is met or at least two strong benign criteria are present.
Criteria assessment
ACMG/AMP criteria review
Criteria shown when status is available
All criteria require review: For research and educational purposes only.
| Criterion | Status | Rationale | Evidence used |
|---|---|---|---|
| PVS1 | N/A | This intronic c.1950+10C>T variant is outside the canonical +/-1,2 splice positions and does not fall into the generic null-variant categories used for default PVS1 application, so PVS1 is not applicable. |
pvs1_gene_context
pvs1_variant_assessment
pvs1_generic_framework
|
| PS1 | N/A | This is not a protein-coding substitution with an established amino acid change, so PS1 is not applicable. |
|
| PS2 | Not assessed | No confirmed de novo data with verified parentage were identified for this variant. |
|
| PS3 | Not assessed | No validated functional study of this exact variant showing a damaging effect was identified. |
|
| PS4 | Not met | Available evidence does not show that this variant is enriched in affected individuals compared with controls. |
clinvar
|
| PM1 | N/A | This intronic +10 variant is not located in a defined mutational hotspot or critical functional domain established for PM1 use. |
|
| PM2 | Not met | This variant is not absent from population databases; instead, it is common in gnomAD with total allele frequencies of 1.36750% in v2.1 and 1.21665% in v4.1, which is far above the generic PM2 rarity threshold of 0.1%. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| PM3 | Not assessed | No evidence was identified showing this variant in trans with a pathogenic variant in a recessive disease setting. |
|
| PM4 | N/A | This intronic substitution does not produce a protein length change, so PM4 is not applicable. |
|
| PM5 | N/A | This variant does not have a defined missense residue context, and the PM5 review artifact did not support classic same-residue PM5 use, so PM5 is not applicable. |
pm5_candidates
|
| PM6 | Not assessed | No assumed de novo occurrence data were identified for this variant. |
|
| PP1 | Not assessed | No segregation data were identified for this variant. |
|
| PP2 | N/A | This is not a missense variant, so PP2 is not applicable. |
|
| PP3 | Not met | Available computational evidence does not support a damaging effect on splicing. SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact, with a maximum delta score of 0.07, which is below commonly used concern thresholds. |
spliceai
|
| PP4 | Not assessed | No phenotype data specific enough to support a highly characteristic TERT-related presentation for this variant were identified. |
|
| PP5 | Not assessed | PP5 was not used because primary supporting evidence for a pathogenic classification was not identified, and this criterion is not relied on here. |
|
| BA1 | Met | Population frequency exceeds the generic BA1 threshold of 1%. This variant is present at 1.36750% in gnomAD v2.1 and 1.21665% in gnomAD v4.1, with the highest observed frequency in the Finnish population at about 4.14% and 4.07%, respectively, which strongly supports a benign interpretation. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| BS1 | N/A | Although the observed population frequency is also above the generic BS1 threshold of 0.3%, BA1 is already met at a stronger benign level, so BS1 is not separately applied to avoid double counting the same frequency evidence. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| BS2 | Not assessed | Although this variant is observed many times in population databases, no dataset-specific healthy adult phenotyping framework was identified to support independent BS2 application. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| BS3 | Not assessed | No validated functional study of this exact variant showing a normal or no-impact effect was identified. |
|
| BS4 | Not assessed | No family data were identified showing lack of segregation with disease. |
|
| BP1 | N/A | This is not a missense variant, so BP1 is not applicable. |
|
| BP2 | Not assessed | No phase data were identified showing this variant in trans with a pathogenic variant for a dominant disorder or in cis with a pathogenic variant. |
|
| BP3 | N/A | This intronic variant is not located in a repetitive region or described low-complexity region used for BP3 assessment. |
|
| BP4 | Met | Available computational evidence supports no meaningful impact on splicing. SpliceAI predicts no significant splice effect, with a maximum delta score of 0.07, which is below commonly used thresholds for splice disruption. |
spliceai
|
| BP5 | Not assessed | No independent alternate molecular explanation for a reported phenotype was identified. |
|
| BP6 | Not assessed | Although ClinVar contains multiple benign submissions, BP6 was not separately applied because the benign classification itself is not treated here as independent criterion-level evidence beyond the underlying population and computational findings. |
clinvar
|
| BP7 | N/A | This is not a synonymous or deep intronic silent variant assessed under BP7 wording; instead, the relevant noncoding computational evidence was considered under BP4. |
spliceai
|
Disclaimer:
The content and results provided by LYFE Sciences are for research and educational purposes only and must not be used as a substitute for professional medical judgment, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making any clinical decisions.