LYFE Sciences · Project HERA
Variant Interpretation · Classification Report
Variant classification summary
NM_007294.4:c.670G>A
BRCA1
· NP_009225.1:p.(Ala224Thr)
· NM_007294.4
GRCh37: chr17:41247863 C>T
·
GRCh38: chr17:43095846 C>T
Gene:
BRCA1
Transcript:
NM_007294.4
Final call
Likely Benign
BP1 strong
PM2 supporting
Variant details
Gene
BRCA1
Transcript
NM_007294.4
Protein
NP_009225.1:p.(Ala224Thr)
gnomAD AF
6.200289181487424e-07 (v4.1)
ClinVar
OncoKB
Unknown Oncogenic Effect
Classification rationale
Interpretation summary
Generated evidence synthesis
1
NM_007294.4:c.670G>A (p.Ala224Thr) is a missense variant in BRCA1 exon 9(10).
2
This variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and present as a singleton in gnomAD v4.1 (1/1,612,828 alleles, AF=6.2e-7), meeting PM2_Supporting under the ENIGMA BRCA1 VCEP specification v1.2.0.
3
BP1_Strong is applied: the variant is a missense substitution located at amino acid position 224, which lies outside all three BRCA1 clinically important functional domains (RING aa 2-101, coiled-coil aa 1391-1424, BRCT aa 1650-1857), and SpliceAI predicts no splicing impact (max delta = 0.00).
4
BayesDel no-AF score is 0.183, falling in the intermediate zone between BP4 (≤0.15) and PP3 (≥0.28); REVEL score is 0.541. Neither PP3 nor BP4 can be applied.
5
The variant-specific clinical-history likelihood ratio from Li et al. 2020 (PMID:31853058) is 1.76 based on 1 proband, falling in the neutral zone (>0.48 and <2.08). Neither PP4 nor BP5 is applicable.
6
No functional assay data (PS3/BS3), case-control data (PS4), co-segregation data (PP1/BS4), or same-residue pathogenic comparator (PS1) was identified for this variant.
7
Under the ENIGMA Table 3 combining rules, the evidence consists of BP1_Strong (1 strong benign) and PM2_Supporting (1 supporting pathogenic). This combination does not satisfy any Pathogenic, Likely Pathogenic, Likely Benign, or Benign classification rule. The variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance (VUS).
Final determination:
Conflicting pathogenic and benign evidence resolved via ENIGMA Table 3 point system: BP1_Strong (-4 benign points) + PM2_Supporting (+1 pathogenic point) = -3, which falls in the Likely Benign range (-6 to -2).
Criteria assessment
ACMG/AMP criteria review
Criteria shown when status is available
All criteria require review: For research and educational purposes only.
| Criterion | Status | Rationale | Evidence used |
|---|---|---|---|
| PVS1 | N/A | PVS1 is not applicable to missense variants under the ENIGMA BRCA1 VCEP. NM_007294.4:c.670G>A is a missense substitution (p.Ala224Thr), not a null variant (nonsense, frameshift, canonical ±1,2 splice site, initiation codon, or exon deletion). SpliceAI predicts no splicing impact (max delta = 0.0). |
cspec
spliceai
pvs1_variant_assessment
|
| PS1 | Not met | No previously classified pathogenic missense variant at the same amino acid position (p.Ala224) was identified. The only same-codon comparator c.670G>C (p.Ala224Pro) is listed in ENIGMA Table 9 with no assigned PS3/BS3 code (PS3/BS3 not met) and has predicted splicing impact, whereas c.670G>A has no splicing impact (SpliceAI=0.0). No pathogenic comparator satisfies the PS1 rule requirements. |
cspec
vcep_specifications_table9_v1_2_2024_11_18
|
| PS2 | N/A | PS2 (de novo) is not part of the ENIGMA BRCA1 and BRCA2 VCEP specification v1.2.0 criteria set. PM6 (also de novo) is explicitly marked Not Applicable by the CSPEC framework. |
cspec
|
| PS3 | Not met | No well-established functional assay data demonstrating a damaging effect on BRCA1 protein function was identified for c.670G>A. ENIGMA Specifications Table 9 (calibrated functional studies) does not list this variant. ST4 functional assay dataset does not contain c.670G>A. No variant-specific functional evidence was found in the literature. |
cspec
vcep_specifications_table9_v1_2_2024_11_18
vcep_supplementarytables_v1_2_2024_11_18
|
| PS4 | Not met | No case-control data demonstrating significantly increased prevalence of c.670G>A in affected individuals versus controls was identified. The variant is absent from ClinVar and no published studies report variant counts in breast/ovarian cancer cohorts. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
clinvar
|
| PS5 | N/A | PS5 is not part of the ENIGMA BRCA1 and BRCA2 VCEP specification v1.2.0 criteria set. |
cspec
|
| PM1 | N/A | PM1 is explicitly marked Not Applicable in the ENIGMA BRCA1 and BRCA2 VCEP specification v1.2.0. |
cspec
|
| PM2 | Met | PM2_Supporting is met under ENIGMA rules. The variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 (non-cancer, exome only subset) and present as a singleton in gnomAD v4.1 (1/1,612,828 alleles, AF=6.2e-7), consistent with absence from controls in an outbred population. The region around the variant has adequate read depth. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
cspec
|
| PM5 | N/A | PM5 in the ENIGMA BRCA1 VCEP is repurposed exclusively for protein termination codon (PTC) variants in exons where a proven pathogenic PTC has been observed (PM5_PTC). c.670G>A is a missense variant, not a PTC. |
cspec
pm5_candidates
|
| PM6 | N/A | PM6 is explicitly marked Not Applicable in the ENIGMA BRCA1 and BRCA2 VCEP specification v1.2.0. |
cspec
|
| PP1 | Not met | No co-segregation data was identified for c.670G>A. No family studies or pedigrees demonstrating segregation of this variant with breast/ovarian cancer in affected family members were found in public databases (ClinVar, LOVD, BRCA Exchange) or the literature. |
clinvar
|
| PP2 | N/A | PP2 is explicitly marked Not Applicable in the ENIGMA BRCA1 and BRCA2 VCEP specification v1.2.0. |
cspec
|
| PP3 | Not met | PP3 is not met under ENIGMA rules. The variant (p.Ala224Thr, position 224) lies outside all three BRCA1 clinically important functional domains (RING aa 2-101, coiled-coil aa 1391-1424, BRCT aa 1650-1857). BayesDel no-AF score (0.183) is below the ≥0.28 threshold. SpliceAI max delta (0.00) is below the ≥0.2 threshold. No predicted impact via protein change or splicing. |
bayesdel
spliceai
revel
cspec
|
| PP4 | Not met | PP4 is not met. The variant-specific clinical-history likelihood ratio from Li et al. 2020 (PMID:31853058) is LR=1.76 (based on 1 proband), which falls in the neutral zone (>0.48 and <2.08). Neither PP4 nor BP5 can be applied. |
PMID:31853058
vcep_pmid_31853058_brca1_clinical_history_lr
|
| PP5 | N/A | PP5 is explicitly marked Not Applicable in the ENIGMA BRCA1 and BRCA2 VCEP specification v1.2.0. |
cspec
|
| BA1 | Not met | BA1 is not met. The variant frequency in gnomAD is well below the ENIGMA BA1 threshold (FAF > 0.1%). gnomAD v2.1: absent. gnomAD v4.1: AF=6.2e-7 (0.000062%). |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
cspec
|
| BS1 | Not met | BS1 is not met. The variant frequency is below both the BS1_Strong threshold (FAF > 0.01%) and the BS1_Supporting threshold (FAF > 0.002%). gnomAD v2.1: absent. gnomAD v4.1: AF=6.2e-7 (0.000062%), below the 0.002% (2e-5) BS1_Supporting threshold. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
cspec
|
| BS2 | Not met | BS2 requires observation of the variant in trans with a pathogenic variant in healthy individuals (absence of Fanconi anemia phenotype). No such data is available for c.670G>A. |
|
| BS3 | Not met | No well-established functional assay data demonstrating no damaging effect on BRCA1 protein function was identified for c.670G>A. ENIGMA Specifications Table 9 does not list this variant for BS3. ST4 functional assay dataset contains no entry for c.670G>A. |
cspec
vcep_specifications_table9_v1_2_2024_11_18
vcep_supplementarytables_v1_2_2024_11_18
|
| BS4 | Not met | No lack of segregation data was identified for c.670G>A. No study reports affected family members who do not carry this variant. |
|
| BP1 | Met | BP1_Strong is met under ENIGMA rules. c.670G>A is a missense variant (p.Ala224Thr) located at amino acid position 224, which is outside all three BRCA1 clinically important functional domains (RING aa 2-101, coiled-coil aa 1391-1424, BRCT aa 1650-1857). SpliceAI predicts no splicing impact (max delta = 0.00, ≤0.1). All conditions for BP1_Strong are satisfied. |
cspec
spliceai
|
| BP2 | N/A | BP2 is explicitly marked Not Applicable in the ENIGMA BRCA1 and BRCA2 VCEP specification v1.2.0. |
cspec
|
| BP4 | Not met | BP4 is not met. The primary BP4 rule requires the variant to be inside a clinically important functional domain with BayesDel ≤0.15 and SpliceAI ≤0.1. Position 224 is outside all three functional domains. Additionally, BayesDel no-AF score (0.183) exceeds the ≤0.15 threshold. The intronic BP4 rule does not apply as this is an exonic variant. |
bayesdel
spliceai
cspec
|
| BP5 | Not met | BP5 is not met. The variant-specific clinical-history likelihood ratio from Li et al. 2020 (PMID:31853058) is LR=1.76 (1 proband), which falls in the neutral zone (>0.48 and <2.08). BP5 Supporting requires LR ≤0.48. |
PMID:31853058
vcep_pmid_31853058_brca1_clinical_history_lr
|
| BP6 | N/A | BP6 is explicitly marked Not Applicable in the ENIGMA BRCA1 and BRCA2 VCEP specification v1.2.0. |
cspec
|
| BP7 | Not met | BP7 is not met. BP7_Strong (RNA) requires well-established functional studies showing no damaging effect on mRNA transcript profile — no such data exists for c.670G>A. BP7_Supporting applies only to silent variants inside functional domains (if BP4 met) or intronic variants at positions ≥+7/-21 (if BP4 met). This variant is a missense outside functional domains and is exonic. |
cspec
spliceai
|
Disclaimer:
The content and results provided by LYFE Sciences are for research and educational purposes only and must not be used as a substitute for professional medical judgment, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making any clinical decisions.