LYFE Sciences · Project HERA
Variant Interpretation · Classification Report
Variant classification summary
NM_003016.4:c.284_307delCCCCCGGACTCACACCACAGCCGC
·
·
GRCh37: None
·
GRCh38: None
Gene:
Transcript:
Final call
VUS
PM4 moderate
Variant details
Gene
Transcript
Protein
gnomAD AF
ClinVar
None
OncoKB
None
Classification rationale
Interpretation summary
Generated evidence synthesis
1
NM_003016.4:c.284_307del is an in-frame deletion of 24 nucleotides in SRSF2, resulting in loss of 8 amino acids (p.Pro95_Arg102del) at the boundary of the RRM and RS-rich domains.
2
The deletion meets PM4 (moderate) because it causes a protein length change through an in-frame deletion in a non-repetitive region, per ACMG/AMP 2015 guidelines.
3
BP3 is not met because the deleted region is non-repetitive and includes Pro95, a residue of established functional significance in SRSF2.
4
PVS1 is not applicable: the variant is an in-frame deletion rather than a null variant. Per ClinGen SVI PVS1 recommendations, in-frame deletions are not eligible for PVS1 at any strength level.
5
Population frequency data from gnomAD v2.1 and v4.1 are unavailable due to incomplete variant normalization in the pipeline. gnomAD-Canada reports AC=0, AN=0 (no data), precluding application of PM2, BA1, or BS1.
6
Pro95 is a known somatic mutational hotspot in SRSF2 (ClinVar: P95H Pathogenic, P95L Pathogenic, P95R Likely pathogenic), but germline hotspot evidence for SRSF2 is not established, so PM1 is not met in this context.
7
Multiple criteria (PS2, PS3, PS4, PM6, PP1, PP4, BS2, BS3, BS4, BP2, BP5, BP6) remain not_assessed due to absence of case-level, functional, segregation, or population data in the available evidence.
8
Based on available evidence, the only applicable criterion is PM4 (moderate). The evidence is insufficient to reach a definitive classification; the variant defaults to Variant of Uncertain Significance (VUS) under generic ACMG/AMP 2015 combination rules.
Final determination:
Generic ACMG/AMP 2015 fallback rules do not meet benign, likely benign, likely pathogenic, or pathogenic combination thresholds, so the variant is classified as Variant of Uncertain Significance.
Criteria assessment
ACMG/AMP criteria review
Criteria shown when status is available
All criteria require review: For research and educational purposes only.
| Criterion | Status | Rationale | Evidence used |
|---|---|---|---|
| PVS1 | N/A | PVS1 is reserved for null variants (nonsense, frameshift, canonical splice, initiation codon, single/multi-exon deletions). NM_003016.4:c.284_307del is an in-frame deletion of 24 bp resulting in p.(Pro95_Arg102del), which does not trigger nonsense-mediated decay or abolish gene function through a null mechanism. Per ClinGen SVI PVS1 recommendations (PMC6185798), in-frame deletions are not eligible for PVS1 at any strength. |
pvs1_generic_framework
|
| PS1 | N/A | PS1 applies when a variant produces the same amino acid change as a previously established pathogenic missense variant. This variant is an in-frame deletion of 8 amino acids, not a single amino acid substitution. |
|
| PS2 | Not assessed | No de novo occurrence data available for this variant. PS2 requires confirmed de novo observation in a patient with disease and no family history. |
|
| PS3 | Not assessed | No functional studies evaluating this specific in-frame deletion were identified in the case evidence. |
|
| PS4 | Not assessed | No case-control or cohort data comparing variant prevalence in affected versus unaffected individuals were identified. |
|
| PS5 | N/A | PS5 is not a standard ACMG/AMP 2015 criterion. It is used only in certain VCEP/CSPEC frameworks; this case uses generic ACMG/AMP rules. |
|
| PM1 | Not met | The deletion removes Pro95, a residue that is a well-known somatic mutational hotspot in SRSF2 for myeloid malignancies (P95H, P95L, P95R are classified as Pathogenic/Likely pathogenic in ClinVar). However, PM1 in the germline ACMG/AMP framework requires evidence that the variant lies within a recognized germline mutational hotspot or critical functional domain established for the associated disease. The Cancer Hotspots database did not flag this exact variant, and no germline-specific hotspot evidence was retrieved. |
generic_acmg_combination_rules
|
| PM2 | Not assessed | gnomAD v2.1 and v4.1 population frequency data are not available (null values in evidence_brief). gnomAD-Canada reports AC=0, AN=0, indicating absence of data rather than confirmed absence from population. PM2 cannot be applied without valid population allele frequency data. |
|
| PM4 | Met | NM_003016.4:c.284_307del is an in-frame deletion of 24 nucleotides, resulting in loss of 8 amino acids (Pro95 through Arg102) without disruption of the reading frame. The deletion spans a non-repetitive region at the boundary of the RRM domain and the RS-rich domain. Per ACMG/AMP 2015 (PMID:25741868), in-frame deletions in non-repeat regions meet PM4 at moderate strength. |
generic_acmg_combination_rules
|
| PM5 | N/A | PM5 applies to a novel missense variant occurring at the same amino acid residue as a previously established pathogenic missense change. This variant is an in-frame deletion, not a missense substitution. |
|
| PM6 | Not assessed | No de novo occurrence data available. PM6 requires a de novo observation without confirmed maternity/paternity. |
|
| PP1 | Not assessed | No co-segregation data available for this variant. |
|
| PP2 | N/A | PP2 applies to missense variants in genes where missense variants are a common disease mechanism and benign missense variation is rare. This variant is an in-frame deletion, not a missense substitution. |
|
| PP3 | N/A | PP3 relies on in silico missense prediction tools (REVEL, BayesDel, etc.) and/or SpliceAI scores. These tools are designed for single-nucleotide missense variants or splice-site variants and are not validated for in-frame deletions. No SpliceAI delta score is available for this variant. |
|
| PP4 | Not assessed | No patient phenotype or family history information was provided for this case. |
|
| PP5 | Not met | PP5 requires that a reputable source (e.g., clinical diagnostic laboratory) has reported the variant as pathogenic. No ClinVar entry was found for this variant, and no other reputable source reporting was identified. |
|
| BA1 | Not assessed | BA1 requires an allele frequency >1% in a general population database. gnomAD v2.1 and v4.1 data are unavailable (null). Cannot assess BA1 without population frequency data. |
|
| BS1 | Not assessed | BS1 requires an allele frequency >0.3% in a general population database. gnomAD v2.1 and v4.1 data are unavailable. Cannot assess BS1 without population frequency data. |
|
| BS2 | Not assessed | No data on observation in healthy adults (homozygous state or in trans with a pathogenic variant) was identified. |
|
| BS3 | Not assessed | No well-established functional studies showing no damaging effect for this specific variant were identified. |
|
| BS4 | Not assessed | No segregation data in affected families is available to evaluate lack of segregation. |
|
| BP1 | N/A | BP1 applies to missense variants in genes where the primary disease mechanism is truncating/loss-of-function. This variant is an in-frame deletion, not a missense substitution. |
|
| BP2 | Not assessed | No data on observation in trans with a known pathogenic variant was identified. |
|
| BP3 | Not met | BP3 applies to in-frame deletions in repetitive regions without known function. The deletion removes residues Pro95 through Arg102 in SRSF2. This region is not repetitive, and Pro95 is a well-established functional residue (somatic hotspot in myeloid malignancies). The RRM/RS-domain boundary region has known functional significance. |
generic_acmg_combination_rules
|
| BP4 | N/A | BP4 relies on multiple lines of computational evidence (REVEL, BayesDel, SpliceAI, etc.) suggesting no impact. These tools are designed for missense or splice-site variants and are not validated for in-frame deletions. |
|
| BP5 | Not assessed | BP5 requires observation of the variant in a case where an alternate molecular basis for disease has been identified. No such data are available. |
|
| BP6 | Not assessed | BP6 requires a reputable source to have reported the variant as benign. No ClinVar entry or diagnostic laboratory report was identified for this variant. |
|
| BP7 | N/A | BP7 applies to synonymous variants with no predicted splicing impact. This variant is an in-frame deletion, not a synonymous substitution. |
|
Disclaimer:
The content and results provided by LYFE Sciences are for research and educational purposes only and must not be used as a substitute for professional medical judgment, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making any clinical decisions.