LYFE Sciences · Project HERA
Variant Interpretation · Classification Report
Variant classification summary
NM_001798.4:c.665C>T
CDK2
· NP_001789.2:p.(Pro222Leu)
· NM_001798.4
GRCh37: chr12:56364904 C>T
·
GRCh38: chr12:55971120 C>T
Gene:
CDK2
Transcript:
NM_001798.4
Final call
VUS
PM2 supporting
Variant details
Gene
CDK2
Transcript
NM_001798.4
Protein
NP_001789.2:p.(Pro222Leu)
gnomAD AF
ClinVar
OncoKB
Classification rationale
Interpretation summary
Generated evidence synthesis
1
NM_001798.4:c.665C>T (p.Pro222Leu) in CDK2 is absent from population databases (gnomAD v2.1 and v4.1), meeting PM2 at supporting strength.
2
No other ACMG/AMP criterion was met. The variant lacks ClinVar classification, functional studies, de novo observations, segregation data, hotspot localization, same-residue pathogenic comparators, and conclusive in silico evidence.
3
With only one supporting criterion (PM2_supporting) and no other criteria met in either the pathogenic or benign direction, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance (VUS) per generic ACMG/AMP 2015 combination rules (PMID:25741868).
Final determination:
Generic ACMG/AMP 2015 fallback rules do not meet benign, likely benign, likely pathogenic, or pathogenic combination thresholds, so the variant is classified as Variant of Uncertain Significance.
Criteria assessment
ACMG/AMP criteria review
Criteria shown when status is available
All criteria require review: For research and educational purposes only.
| Criterion | Status | Rationale | Evidence used |
|---|---|---|---|
| PVS1 | N/A | This is a missense variant (c.665C>T, p.Pro222Leu) that does not fall into the PVS1 null-variant categories of nonsense, frameshift, or canonical ±1,2 splice consensus variants. Per ClinGen SVI PVS1 recommendations (PMC6185798), generic PVS1 is not applicable to missense variants. |
pvs1_generic_framework
|
| PS1 | Not assessed | No known pathogenic nucleotide change at the same position (c.665) producing the same amino acid change (p.Pro222Leu) was identified in ClinVar or the literature. |
clinvar
pm5_candidates
|
| PS2 | Not assessed | No de novo observation of NM_001798.4:c.665C>T was identified in the literature or ClinVar. No parentage-confirmed de novo reports are available. |
clinvar
|
| PS3 | Not assessed | No well-established in vitro or in vivo functional studies were identified for this specific variant (NM_001798.4:c.665C>T, p.Pro222Leu) in CDK2. |
|
| PS4 | Not assessed | No case-control data or statistical enrichment analysis was identified for this variant in any disease cohort. |
|
| PS5 | Not assessed | No alternative pathogenic missense change at residue Pro222 was identified. The PM5 candidate search returned zero same-residue comparators; ClinVar contains no entries for this variant. |
pm5_candidates
clinvar
|
| PM1 | Not met | This variant does not lie in a statistically significant mutational hotspot (CancerHotspots). Residue 222 resides within the CDK2 kinase domain, but no evidence was provided that this is a well-established critical functional domain lacking benign missense variation in the germline disease context. |
|
| PM2 | Met | This variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 (exomes), gnomAD v4.1 (exomes), and gnomAD-Canada v1.0 population databases, consistent with a rare variant. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| PM5 | Not assessed | No same-residue pathogenic comparator variants (different missense change at Pro222) were identified in ClinVar. PM5 candidate harvesting yielded zero comparators; no published alternative missense at residue 222 was found. |
pm5_candidates
clinvar
|
| PM6 | Not assessed | No de novo observation of NM_001798.4:c.665C>T was identified. PM6 requires a de novo observation (with or without confirmed parentage), and none was found in ClinVar or the literature. |
clinvar
|
| PP1 | Not assessed | No segregation data are available for this variant. |
|
| PP2 | Not assessed | HCI prior scores are not available for CDK2. Without missense constraint metrics (e.g., Z-score, missense depletion), it cannot be determined whether CDK2 has a low rate of benign missense variation to support PP2. |
|
| PP3 | Not met | In silico evidence is equivocal. REVEL score is 0.661 (below the 0.75 threshold typically used for computational pathogenicity support), BayesDel score is -0.044 (benign-leaning), and SpliceAI predicts no splicing impact (max delta 0.02). These do not constitute multiple lines of computational evidence supporting a deleterious effect. |
revel
bayesdel
spliceai
|
| PP4 | Not assessed | No patient phenotype information is available. PP4 requires that the patient's phenotype or family history is highly specific for a disease with a single genetic etiology. |
|
| PP5 | Not assessed | No reputable source (e.g., ClinGen-recognized expert panel, clinical diagnostic laboratory) has reported this variant as pathogenic. The variant is absent from ClinVar. |
clinvar
|
| BA1 | Not met | The variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and v4.1 population databases. Allele frequency is 0%, far below the BA1 threshold of >5%. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| BS1 | Not met | The variant is absent from population databases (gnomAD v2.1, v4.1). Allele frequency does not exceed the expected prevalence threshold for a rare disorder. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| BS2 | Not assessed | No observation of this variant in a healthy adult individual has been reported for a fully penetrant disorder. No genotype-phenotype data available. |
|
| BS3 | Not assessed | No well-established in vitro or in vivo functional studies showing no deleterious effect were identified for NM_001798.4:c.665C>T in CDK2. |
|
| BS4 | Not assessed | No nonsegregation data are available for this variant. |
|
| BP1 | Not assessed | While loss of function is supported as a CDK2 germline disease mechanism (pvs1_gene_context: lof_mechanism_supported=true), CDK2 is not an established disease gene where primarily truncating variants are known to cause disease. Insufficient evidence to apply BP1. |
|
| BP2 | Not assessed | No observation of this variant in trans with a known pathogenic variant in CDK2 was identified. |
|
| BP4 | Not met | In silico evidence is equivocal and does not constitute multiple lines of computational evidence suggesting no impact. REVEL 0.661 is above the benign range; BayesDel -0.044 is mildly benign-leaning; SpliceAI max delta 0.02 shows no splicing effect. The aggregate evidence is insufficient for BP4. |
revel
bayesdel
spliceai
|
| BP5 | Not assessed | No observation of this variant in a case where an alternate molecular basis for disease was identified. |
|
| BP6 | Not assessed | No reputable source reports this variant as benign. The variant is absent from ClinVar. |
clinvar
|
| BP7 | N/A | This is a missense variant (c.665C>T, p.Pro222Leu), not a synonymous or intronic variant. BP7 applies only to synonymous variants with no predicted splicing impact. |
|
| BP3 | N/A | This variant is a single-nucleotide missense substitution, not an in-frame insertion or deletion in a repetitive region. |
|
| PM3 | N/A | No second pathogenic variant in trans was identified. PM3 is for recessive disorders; no recessive CDK2 disorder is established, and no trans observation data exist. |
|
| PM4 | N/A | This variant is a single-nucleotide missense substitution (c.665C>T), not a protein-length-altering in-frame deletion or insertion or stop-loss variant. |
|
Disclaimer:
The content and results provided by LYFE Sciences are for research and educational purposes only and must not be used as a substitute for professional medical judgment, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making any clinical decisions.