LYFE Sciences · Project HERA
Variant Interpretation · Classification Report
Variant classification summary
NM_032043.3:c.611C>G
BRIP1
· NP_114432.2:p.(Ser204Cys)
· NM_032043.3
GRCh37: chr17:59924478 G>C
·
GRCh38: chr17:61847117 G>C
Gene:
BRIP1
Transcript:
NM_032043.3
Final call
VUS
PM2 moderate
BP4 supporting benign
Variant details
Gene
BRIP1
Transcript
NM_032043.3
Protein
NP_114432.2:p.(Ser204Cys)
gnomAD AF
ClinVar
OncoKB
Unknown Oncogenic Effect
Classification rationale
Interpretation summary
Generated evidence synthesis
1
NM_032043.3:c.611C>G (p.Ser204Cys) is a missense variant in BRIP1 that is absent from all large population databases including gnomAD v2.1, v4.1, and gnomAD-Canada.
2
Multiple in silico predictors (REVEL 0.24, BayesDel -0.212, SpliceAI max delta 0.00) indicate this variant is tolerated and does not affect splicing.
3
No variant-specific functional studies, case-control data, co-segregation data, or de novo observations were identified for this variant in the peer-reviewed literature.
4
Applying generic ACMG/AMP 2015 classification rules (PMID:25741868): one moderate pathogenic criterion (PM2) and one supporting benign criterion (BP4) are met, resulting in insufficient evidence for classification; the variant is a Variant of Uncertain Significance (VUS).
Final determination:
Generic ACMG/AMP 2015 fallback rules do not meet benign, likely benign, likely pathogenic, or pathogenic combination thresholds, so the variant is classified as Variant of Uncertain Significance.
Criteria assessment
ACMG/AMP criteria review
Criteria shown when status is available
All criteria require review: For research and educational purposes only.
| Criterion | Status | Rationale | Evidence used |
|---|---|---|---|
| PVS1 | N/A | NM_032043.3:c.611C>G is a missense variant (p.Ser204Cys) and does not fall into the generic PVS1 null-variant buckets of nonsense, frameshift, or canonical ±1,2 splice consensus variants; PVS1 is not applicable. |
pvs1_generic_framework
|
| PS1 | Not assessed | No alternate nucleotide change at codon 204 leading to the same p.Ser204Cys missense change has been identified in ClinVar or the literature as pathogenic; PS1 cannot be assessed. |
|
| PS2 | Not assessed | No reports of de novo occurrence of this variant (with confirmed maternity and paternity) were identified in the literature or databases. |
|
| PS3 | Not met | No well-established in vitro or in vivo functional studies demonstrating a damaging effect of p.Ser204Cys on BRIP1 protein function have been identified in the peer-reviewed literature. |
|
| PS4 | Not met | No case-control studies demonstrate a statistically significant enrichment of this variant in affected individuals compared to population controls. |
|
| PS5 | N/A | PS5 is not a criterion in the standard ACMG/AMP 2015 framework (PMID:25741868); no BRIP1-specific VCEP defines an extended PS5 rule. |
|
| PM1 | Not met | Residue 204 lies within the DEAD-like helicase domain (residues ~1-440) but is not located within a defined mutational hotspot or a critical functional domain with established clustering of pathogenic missense variants. |
|
| PM2 | Met | This variant is absent from all large population databases including gnomAD v2.1, gnomAD v4.1, and gnomAD-Canada v1.0, with an allele frequency well below the 0.1% threshold for PM2. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
gnomad_canada
|
| PM5 | Not assessed | No pathogenic missense variants at codon 204 involving a different amino acid change were identified in ClinVar; PM5 cannot be assessed without a same-residue comparator. |
|
| PM6 | Not met | No reports of a de novo occurrence of this variant without confirmation of parental identity were identified. |
|
| PP1 | Not met | No co-segregation data with disease in families harboring this variant have been published; no LOD scores or pedigree analyses are available. |
|
| PP2 | Not met | Insufficient evidence that BRIP1 has a low rate of benign missense variation and that missense variants are a common mechanism of disease; many BRIP1 missense variants remain classified as VUS. |
|
| PP3 | Not met | Multiple in silico predictors do not support a deleterious effect: REVEL score 0.24 (below 0.5 damaging threshold), BayesDel score -0.212 (benign-polar), and SpliceAI max delta 0.00 (no splicing impact predicted). |
revel
bayesdel
spliceai
|
| PP4 | Not assessed | No patient phenotype or family history information is available for this case to assess specificity of clinical presentation. |
|
| PP5 | Not met | No reputable source (e.g., clinical diagnostic laboratory, expert panel) recently reports this variant as pathogenic without supporting evidence available for independent evaluation. |
|
| BA1 | Not met | This variant is absent from all large population databases (gnomAD v2.1, v4.1, gnomAD-Canada); allele frequency of 0 does not exceed the BA1 threshold of >1%. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
gnomad_canada
|
| BS1 | Not met | This variant is absent from all population databases; allele frequency of 0 does not exceed the BS1 threshold of >0.3%. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
gnomad_canada
|
| BS2 | Not met | No evidence that this variant has been observed in homozygous state, in trans with a pathogenic variant, or in healthy adult individuals with full penetrance expected at an early age. |
|
| BS3 | Not assessed | A 2024 bioRxiv preprint (Putnam et al.) from exploratory search suggests p.Ser204Cys has near-wildtype function in a multiplexed assay of variant effect; however, these data are not peer-reviewed and a single preprint does not constitute well-established functional evidence sufficient to meet BS3. |
|
| BS4 | Not assessed | No segregation data demonstrating lack of co-segregation with disease in affected families are available. |
|
| BP1 | Not met | Although BRIP1 loss-of-function is an established disease mechanism, pathogenic missense variants have been reported in BRIP1; insufficient evidence exists to conclude that primarily truncating variants are known to cause BRIP1-related disease to the exclusion of missense variants. |
|
| BP2 | Not assessed | This variant has not been observed in trans with a known pathogenic BRIP1 variant in an individual with a fully penetrant dominant disorder, nor in cis with a pathogenic BRIP1 variant. |
|
| PM3 | N/A | Skipped per instructions: PM3 applies to recessive disorders with in trans observation; BRIP1 germline context is dominant cancer predisposition and no in trans data exist. |
|
| PM4 | N/A | Skipped per instructions: PM4 applies to in-frame deletions/insertions or stop-loss variants; this is a missense substitution. |
|
| BP3 | N/A | Skipped per instructions: BP3 applies to in-frame deletions/insertions in repeating regions; this is a missense substitution. |
|
| BP4 | Met | Multiple lines of computational evidence suggest no impact on gene product: REVEL score 0.24 (below pathogenic threshold), BayesDel score -0.212 (benign-polar), and SpliceAI max delta 0.00 (no predicted splicing alteration). |
revel
bayesdel
spliceai
|
| BP5 | Not assessed | No clinical case information is available demonstrating an alternate molecular basis for disease in a proband harboring this variant. |
|
| BP6 | Not met | No reputable source (e.g., clinical diagnostic laboratory, expert panel) recently reports this variant as benign without supporting evidence available for independent evaluation. |
|
| BP7 | N/A | BP7 applies to synonymous (silent) variants; NM_032043.3:c.611C>G is a missense variant (p.Ser204Cys). |
|
Disclaimer:
The content and results provided by LYFE Sciences are for research and educational purposes only and must not be used as a substitute for professional medical judgment, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making any clinical decisions.